ATTENTION! For those who want to use Tracktion Waveform in their workflow!
-
- KVRian
- 501 posts since 3 Dec, 2021
And just to be clear, all these examples use the 'route audio from track x' to record onto another track. Waveform appears to compensate for the latency on track x (the track being recorded) However, if another, even unrelated, track has plugins totalling a higher latency, your recording appears to be shifted by the difference between the higher and lower latencies.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 359 posts since 21 Jun, 2020
Thank you for confirming the existence of this problem. I don't think that users should come up with something to solve this. The user must turn on the program and not keep in mind the mistakes of the developers. What is your computer configuration?dysjoint wrote: Sun Aug 06, 2023 12:14 am Btw, thanks for posting about this. I should be able to work around the issue easily now that I think I understand it, but if I hadn't tried replicating with such extreme latency plugins, I wouldn't have found it so clearly.
-
- KVRian
- 501 posts since 3 Dec, 2021
1 year old build, i9 12th gen, 32 gb ddr5 ram, Samsung 980 PRO ssd x 2. Running as out of the box, no tweaking. Budget presonus interface, running their asio drivers, at 48000, buffer around 5 ms. Windows 11 up to date, Waveform Pro.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 359 posts since 21 Jun, 2020
Thank you!dysjoint wrote: Mon Aug 07, 2023 7:13 pm 1 year old build, i9 12th gen, 32 gb ddr5 ram, Samsung 980 PRO ssd x 2. Running as out of the box, no tweaking. Budget presonus interface, running their asio drivers, at 48000, buffer around 5 ms. Windows 11 up to date, Waveform Pro.
- KVRAF
- 4891 posts since 3 Jan, 2003 from Vancouver
Back in the 1940s my grandfather bought a plot of land at 626 West 32nd Avenue for $4000 and built himself a house. It's still there. (He's not.) Current price: $4,898,000
Surely there must be consensus by now...
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 359 posts since 21 Jun, 2020
have the delay compensation been fixed?
Oh, no.
Thank you for the digression into your story. Thank you for the information
- KVRAF
- 4891 posts since 3 Jan, 2003 from Vancouver
I figured we had plenty of time.nowgad wrote: Thu Aug 10, 2023 7:26 pm Thank you for the digression into your story. Thank you for the information![]()
Surely there must be consensus by now...
- KVRist
- 147 posts since 22 Oct, 2016
Gorgeous, a familiar glitch, I get this if I try to render a track with fabfilter pro q3 in linear mode of any complexity, I thought it was because I was working at a high frequency, but it turns out this is another sore (zero surprise)
Did you know that the native volume control on tracks makes noise in automation? I came across this test on the forums (link to it), repeated what was described and made sure, moreover, automating the volume of the master channel or any other plug-in with volume, there is no noise at all at the output. It's so terribly strange that it's even funny
Did you know that the native volume control on tracks makes noise in automation? I came across this test on the forums (link to it), repeated what was described and made sure, moreover, automating the volume of the master channel or any other plug-in with volume, there is no noise at all at the output. It's so terribly strange that it's even funny
цвет волшебства
