Eh? I just watched the cockos youtube video where he compares the two and the changes to the saturation is HUGE. It literally sounds nothing like the mk1.pdxindy wrote: Wed Nov 01, 2023 7:39 pmThe difference in sound is minimal. I've had both and I consider them essentially the same.bmanic wrote: Mon Oct 30, 2023 3:34 pm
They changed the internals for the mk2 to make it more palatable for most people. Apparently it is beefier, with more sub bass range and a more refined (some describe it as "scooped") sound.
Then main difference for me is the ergonomics. I like the MK II's distinctly better for workflow.
The 2nd filter definitely also has very different sound to it.
I checked because I set my mk1 up exactly like the settings he was comparing and indeed I could not duplicate the mk2 sound when using the 2nd filter + distortion.
So yeah, while everything else sounds pretty much the same, the overdrive and the filter are nothing alike.
Personally I think the biggest benefit is indeed the workflow. That performance knob and the extra buttons may very well take me over the edge and try to find a mk2 at some point. However, right now I'm content in just using this as a synth in a box. Haven't even started working with the sequencer yet.