Agreed. What's easy to use about it? Even back then I found its sonic footprint limiting and working with it a bit tedious. I think that it's largely nostalgia for those who didn't have access to similar hardware when it came out.Daru925 wrote: Sat Nov 25, 2023 7:19 pm I was amazed by the iconic rb-338 when i was amazed by an intel celeron, raveejay and anything that made my go:.
"Whoah i can make music with ... the family's computer? ^^ let me check the internet"
For me its nostalgia 338, maybe for you there is something modern setups lack (sound? ease of use? graphics?), but i really don't see what it is, excuse my ears.
Petition for ReBirth 338 revival
-
- KVRAF
- 16818 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
-
- Pick Me Pick me!
- 10251 posts since 12 Mar, 2002 from a state of confusion
tedious (to use) is the key word there.
Frustratingly tedious and obtuse method of working that didn't need to be, considering it wasn't a physical device.
For the time it was pretty amazing though to have an all-in-one software groove machine with those specific devices.
A few years back I bought a TD3 when they came out, for nostalgia's sake. I wanted a 303 after all those years as a teen spending all the time trying to figure out how to make the software versions work, only to stuff it back in the box and put it in a closet after a few plays.
There is no way I'm going back to stepping in every note like that again. Enough.
Frustratingly tedious and obtuse method of working that didn't need to be, considering it wasn't a physical device.
For the time it was pretty amazing though to have an all-in-one software groove machine with those specific devices.
A few years back I bought a TD3 when they came out, for nostalgia's sake. I wanted a 303 after all those years as a teen spending all the time trying to figure out how to make the software versions work, only to stuff it back in the box and put it in a closet after a few plays.
There is no way I'm going back to stepping in every note like that again. Enough.
- KVRian
- 1323 posts since 26 Mar, 2004 from UK
I feel like SugarBytes Egoist was an attempt to update this paradigm: drums, bass, loop slicer and FX. I suspect its lack of multiple outputs crippled its usability from the start.
ABLETON LIVE 12 & PUSH3
Soundcloud: Nation of Korea vs Shitty Dog
Soundcloud: Nation of Korea vs Shitty Dog
-
- KVRAF
- 5229 posts since 13 Jul, 2004 from Earth
My favorite was not Propellerheads Rebirth but Steinberg Rebirth One that looked so much better than the later Rebirth versions.
In the beginning Steinberg owned Propellerheads until they decided to split and Propellerheads where Born and the ugly Rebirth where Born and Rebirth one faded away in it's shadows

Today i don't see a reason for Rebirth to exist since we have so many 303 and drum emulations to choose from in hw and software that are much easier to use in a daw.
It was groundbreaking technology when it was released back in the day but not today.
If you use Reason you can build a Combinator with the same setup to mimic Rebirth.
In the beginning Steinberg owned Propellerheads until they decided to split and Propellerheads where Born and the ugly Rebirth where Born and Rebirth one faded away in it's shadows

Today i don't see a reason for Rebirth to exist since we have so many 303 and drum emulations to choose from in hw and software that are much easier to use in a daw.
It was groundbreaking technology when it was released back in the day but not today.
If you use Reason you can build a Combinator with the same setup to mimic Rebirth.
-
- KVRian
- 1389 posts since 24 Sep, 2021
So wheres the petition?
-
- KVRian
- 764 posts since 2 Jun, 2004
Steinberg never owned propellerhead as far as I'm aware. They had a partnership, and I believe Steinberg acted as publisher/distributor, but that's about it.D-Fusion wrote: Sun Nov 26, 2023 10:29 am In the beginning Steinberg owned Propellerheads until they decided to split and Propellerheads where Born and the ugly Rebirth where Born and Rebirth one faded away in it's shadows
-
- KVRAF
- 5229 posts since 13 Jul, 2004 from Earth
You are correct and they where more partners than owners of Propellerhead.eXode wrote: Sun Nov 26, 2023 11:18 amSteinberg never owned propellerhead as far as I'm aware. They had a partnership, and I believe Steinberg acted as publisher/distributor, but that's about it.D-Fusion wrote: Sun Nov 26, 2023 10:29 am In the beginning Steinberg owned Propellerheads until they decided to split and Propellerheads where Born and the ugly Rebirth where Born and Rebirth one faded away in it's shadows
When Steinberg One was released Steinberg was the first thing you saw in the About/Info page and Propellerhead where in small text that made me think that they owned Propellerheads back in the day.
- KVRAF
- 5379 posts since 22 Jul, 2006 from Tasmania, Australia
There's no way to get this is there?
I wonder what I want in here
-my site is gone and music a mess
-my site is gone and music a mess
-
- KVRAF
- 35689 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
I didn't know that Peter Jubel was on board at Propellerhead so early. Here's a list of what he did, apart from doing the DSP for the first Nord Lead synth: https://forum.reasontalk.com/viewtopic. ... ed#p518069D-Fusion wrote: Sun Nov 26, 2023 10:29 am In the beginning Steinberg owned Propellerheads until they decided to split and Propellerheads where Born and the ugly Rebirth where Born and Rebirth one faded away in it's shadows
![]()
-
- KVRAF
- 5229 posts since 13 Jul, 2004 from Earth
- KVRAF
- 5379 posts since 22 Jul, 2006 from Tasmania, Australia
ta,
hmm
I do need to buy it in a box I guess
hmm
I do need to buy it in a box I guess
I wonder what I want in here
-my site is gone and music a mess
-my site is gone and music a mess
- KVRAF
- 8563 posts since 2 Aug, 2005 from Guitar Land, USA
Mine runs on windows 11 so I don't want an upgrade, everything upgraded always is horrible.
I'm glad I downloaded and saved a bunch of songs too.
I'm glad I downloaded and saved a bunch of songs too.
The only site for experimental amp sim freeware & MIDI FX: http://runbeerrun.blogspot.com
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCprNcvVH6aPTehLv8J5xokA -Youtube jams
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCprNcvVH6aPTehLv8J5xokA -Youtube jams
-
- KVRian
- 657 posts since 2 May, 2002 from Kalispell, MT
I think it would have been a lot cooler if he'd done it with the Behringer stuff and all off the shelf, buy it in a music store today gear. As I recall, one of the things that was so great about getting Rebirth was that it kinda gave you access to gear that was unobtainium. Those OG Roland boxes have only become more unobtainium since. Using ~$10K+ in hardware to emulate an old softsynth just seems like a flex more than anything.jsp1979 wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2023 8:04 pm They guy on YouTube's Bad Gear channel built a physical version. You could try that, I guess.
I liked his results though.
-
- KVRist
- 409 posts since 19 Feb, 2022
TIL there were multiple apps called ReBirth lol.
I used the one from Propellerheads’ for like a week, then Reason 1.0 came out and switched to that lol.
I used the one from Propellerheads’ for like a week, then Reason 1.0 came out and switched to that lol.
