UPDATED: Zynaptiq Morph3
- KVRian
- 653 posts since 7 Jun, 2021
i just stumbled over this, cause a post from @tlkmx.
M4L only ! ....what ya think, check the video
https://payhip.com/b/h9l7V
is morph 3 as good ?
i used both V2 and V3 in completely different contexts.
gonna start now my "Live12" and check with morph 3 with some audio files.
...so far, i´m quite a bit ........edit: overreaction from my side
M4L only ! ....what ya think, check the video
https://payhip.com/b/h9l7V
is morph 3 as good ?
i used both V2 and V3 in completely different contexts.
gonna start now my "Live12" and check with morph 3 with some audio files.
...so far, i´m quite a bit ........edit: overreaction from my side
Last edited by Funky40 on Fri Mar 29, 2024 9:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 4218 posts since 15 Sep, 2010
Very far away from it. This just sounds like a deluxe vocoder on steroids. You won’t get that special spectral pitch morphing only Kyma seems to be able to do so far, and Alchemy to a certain extent.
- KVRist
- 235 posts since 11 Oct, 2012
149 + 19% = 177.31 - price in € is 169 -> difference of 20 between USD and EUR prices even though the price is lower...martinjuenke wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2024 5:08 pm19% Valued Added Tax in Germany.metaside wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2024 2:30 pm What's going on with the pricing? USD 169/EUR 179* versus USD 149/EUR 169*? Why does the upgrade show double the difference between USD and EUR prices even though the price is lower? Are the prices randomized?
Looks good but I'm not paying 180€ for an upgrade...MORPH 3 and MORPH 3 PRO will be available from the Zynaptiq website and authorized resellers worldwide April 15th, 2024, at an SRP of USD 169/EUR 179* (MORPH 3) or USD 279/EUR 309* (MORPH 3 PRO).
Users of MORPH 2 will be able to upgrade to MORPH 3 or MORPH 3 PRO at a reduced price of USD 69/EUR 79* (MORPH 3) or USD 149/EUR 169* (MORPH 3 PRO) via the Zynaptiq website starting April 15th, 2024.
169 + 19% = 201.11 - price in € is 179 -> difference of 10 between USD and EUR prices even though the price is higher...
Sounds pretty random to me, but great if it makes sense for you
Some music with visuals and mixed tutorials related to game dev and sound design: https://www.youtube.com/@MetasideOfficial
- KVRAF
- 3192 posts since 31 Dec, 2004 from People's Republic of Minnesota
Can someone explain what makes morph 3 not a legitimate morph?
-
- KVRist
- 63 posts since 20 Mar, 2024
pretty sure it is a legitimate morph just doesn't work like the kyma one which some people prefer.masterhiggins wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 1:28 am Can someone explain what makes morph 3 not a legitimate morph?
-
Sampleconstruct Sampleconstruct https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=191286
- KVRAF
- 16158 posts since 12 Oct, 2008 from Here and there
I think when it comes to audio-morphing many users will feel the impulse to mention the word "Kyma" just like the terms "analog" and "warmth" have to be mentioned when it comes to synthesis. As a real time audio processor Morph 3 has come quite far, as far as I know Kyma is not processing incoming audio in real time (correct me if I'm wrong) and its morphing capabilities are based on additive synthesis so it's rebuilding sounds with sine waves. None of the Kyma examples I found so far have blown me away in any sense and shelling out almost 4000 bucks for the hardware in order to use Kyma is quite an investment.
-
- KVRAF
- 8504 posts since 5 Aug, 2009
is there any plugin which can morph incoming signals in realtime other than Morph3 (now)? i dont know any so far yet but didnt check it out to be honest
DAW FL Studio Audio Interface Focusrite Scarlett 1st Gen 2i2 CPU Intel i7-7700K 4.20 GHz, RAM 32 GB Dual-Channel DDR4 @2400MHz Corsair Vengeance. MB Asus Prime Z270-K, GPU Gainward 1070 GTX GS 8GB NT Be Quiet DP 550W OS Win10 64Bit
- KVRAF
- 2847 posts since 8 Jun, 2018
MeldaProduction MMorph.
(and for Live + M4L; Alexandor Panos Color Transfer)
Primoridal Music: sadà\exposadà - Indusrial & Expanding Your Mind Hurts: Sound Brut
-
- KVRist
- 63 posts since 20 Mar, 2024
even worse, it is a conceptual failure to define 'morph' as what Kyma does and then criticise anything that claims to morph because it does not reproduce the kyma algorithm. In other words everything other than kyma is predefined as a failureSampleconstruct wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 9:07 am I think when it comes to audio-morphing many users will feel the impulse to mention the word "Kyma" just like the terms "analog" and "warmth" have to be mentioned when it comes to synthesis. As a real time audio processor Morph 3 has come quite far, as far as I know Kyma is not processing incoming audio in real time (correct me if I'm wrong) and its morphing capabilities are based on additive synthesis so it's rebuilding sounds with sine waves. None of the Kyma examples I found so far have blown me away in any sense and shelling out almost 4000 bucks for the hardware in order to use Kyma is quite an investment.
- KVRAF
- 35299 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
Yes, I think a better definition of morphing would be to contrast it with various forms of blending or crossfading. With true morphing you have a process of interpolation between 2 data points (could be sounds, could be faces), which in relation to sound requires a process of analysis and resynthesis/reconstruction of the sound at each point in the morph continuum.sandandpaint wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 9:16 ameven worse, it is a conceptual failure to define 'morph' as what Kyma does and then criticise anything that claims to morph because it does not reproduce the kyma algorithm. In other words everything other than kyma is predefined as a failureSampleconstruct wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 9:07 am I think when it comes to audio-morphing many users will feel the impulse to mention the word "Kyma" just like the terms "analog" and "warmth" have to be mentioned when it comes to synthesis. As a real time audio processor Morph 3 has come quite far, as far as I know Kyma is not processing incoming audio in real time (correct me if I'm wrong) and its morphing capabilities are based on additive synthesis so it's rebuilding sounds with sine waves. None of the Kyma examples I found so far have blown me away in any sense and shelling out almost 4000 bucks for the hardware in order to use Kyma is quite an investment.
Crossfading and blending on the other hand do not analyse and reconstruct the original data, they just attenuate one data point in various ways and emphasise the other. It's more of a remix than a resynthesis.
- KVRian
- 653 posts since 7 Jun, 2021
Funky40 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2024 7:40 pm i just stumbled over this, cause a post from @tlkmx.
M4L only ! ....what ya think, check the video
https://payhip.com/b/h9l7V
has anybody here an opinion how Color Transfer compares to Morph 3 ?
Would it add something to the table ?
-
- KVRist
- 196 posts since 19 Jul, 2016
United Plugins Transmutator is worth a look as well:
https://unitedplugins.com/Transmutator/
- KVRAF
- 3192 posts since 31 Dec, 2004 from People's Republic of Minnesota
Sampleconstruct wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 9:07 am I think when it comes to audio-morphing many users will feel the impulse to mention the word "Kyma" just like the terms "analog" and "warmth" have to be mentioned when it comes to synthesis. As a real time audio processor Morph 3 has come quite far, as far as I know Kyma is not processing incoming audio in real time (correct me if I'm wrong) and its morphing capabilities are based on additive synthesis so it's rebuilding sounds with sine waves. None of the Kyma examples I found so far have blown me away in any sense and shelling out almost 4000 bucks for the hardware in order to use Kyma is quite an investment.
Thanks guys. I thought it might be something like that. I just know it sounds good, so it was really just curiosity. I’ll see what kind of deals they have for zap2 bundle owners. I also have intensity and orange vocoder which I bought separately as it was actually cheaper than upgrading to zap3.sandandpaint wrote:pretty sure it is a legitimate morph just doesn't work like the kyma one which some people prefer.
-
- KVRist
- 45 posts since 24 Feb, 2008
I get where you are coming from, but you seriously think this is worse than what’s available with Morph 3 and other non-Kyma tools, for example? https://youtu.be/nt9tXXaXRrM?si=-Sq7gmDy4PI_GpOuSampleconstruct wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 9:07 am I think when it comes to audio-morphing many users will feel the impulse to mention the word "Kyma" just like the terms "analog" and "warmth" have to be mentioned when it comes to synthesis. As a real time audio processor Morph 3 has come quite far, as far as I know Kyma is not processing incoming audio in real time (correct me if I'm wrong) and its morphing capabilities are based on additive synthesis so it's rebuilding sounds with sine waves. None of the Kyma examples I found so far have blown me away in any sense and shelling out almost 4000 bucks for the hardware in order to use Kyma is quite an investment.
Nothing I’ve heard yet comes close to the clarity and precision of these examples. I would never invest in Kyma hardware but the quality is there nonetheless and cannot be found anywhere else, imho. I say that as a Morph 3 Pro owner (have yet to sit down to test it tho, but judging it based on your recent Youtube video).
-
- KVRAF
- 4218 posts since 15 Sep, 2010