Behringer Vintage Plugin

[rod_zero]

Truth is other companies have been making as cheap as possible analog synths, because they don't have the economies of scale of behringer nor the capital, Roland made the SE02 at a low price point and more features than Behringer Model D clone, DSI made the mopho and tetra more than a decade ago, novation made the bass station 2, arturia made the minibrute and there are many other examples. And then there was plugins and DAW to make any damn music on the cheap for 200 years before Behringer was interested in the synth market.

And worse of all they love to play the victim when they are bigger than all the other manufacturers, except yamaha but they are bigger conglomerate, they have a martyr complex.

[dartfordyes]

It's like the 3 blind men and the elephant.
One says, "it's a Tone2 Saurus copy!"
Another says, "it's an Ableton Analog copy!"
The third says, "it's an AAS Ultra Analog copy!"

But they're all right, and wrong at the same time.
Because really, it's just another Behringer.

why does it matter who they copied , everyone will still download it , personally i think
they look nothing alike the behringer looks far superior in design
and having not tried it yet that’s all i can say

Pumped for the daw

[Greenstorm33]

It's like the 3 blind men and the elephant.
One says, "it's a Tone2 Saurus copy!"
Another says, "it's an Ableton Analog copy!"
The third says, "it's an AAS Ultra Analog copy!"

But they're all right, and wrong at the same time.
Because really, it's just another Behringer.

Either way it's further evidence that the vast majority of the people at the company have not come up with an original idea in their entire lives.

And yet they have figured out ways to make vintage sounding Synths at low price points and have come up with all new synth designs

Why haven't other companies been able to do the same? Even when they are reissuing their own synth designs?

And what is so unique about Saurus? It's an emulation after all

Functionally nothing. It's the UI that is similar and I'm convinced half of the people here need glasses since they insist they can't see it. The color scheme is extremely similar, the knobs are almost identical, the (AFAIK) fairly distinct small square buttons are there. It's so similar that I saw multiple people outside this thread speculate that tone2 was involved when in fact they had nothing to do with it. And that's the only problem. It looks like their stuff and it's not. If they released something that looked this similar to Massive, even if it were functionally different, do you think NI would let it fly? I doubt it. They had to pick someone without the resources to fight back.

[Examigan]

I wonder why they took down the page if there’s no problem with it?

[Greenstorm33]

I wonder why they took down the page if there’s no problem with it?

My synths! The buttons do nothing!

behringer.png

[dartfordyes]

It's like the 3 blind men and the elephant.
One says, "it's a Tone2 Saurus copy!"
Another says, "it's an Ableton Analog copy!"
The third says, "it's an AAS Ultra Analog copy!"

But they're all right, and wrong at the same time.
Because really, it's just another Behringer.

Either way it's further evidence that the vast majority of the people at the company have not come up with an original idea in their entire lives.

And yet they have figured out ways to make vintage sounding Synths at low price points and have come up with all new synth designs

Why haven't other companies been able to do the same? Even when they are reissuing their own synth designs?

And what is so unique about Saurus? It's an emulation after all

Functionally nothing. It's the UI that is similar and I'm convinced half of the people here need glasses since they insist they can't see it. The color scheme is extremely similar, the knobs are almost identical, the (AFAIK) fairly distinct small square buttons are there. It's so similar that I saw multiple people outside this thread speculate that tone2 was involved when in fact they had nothing to do with it. And that's the only problem. It looks like their stuff and it's not. If they released something that looked this similar to Massive, even if it were functionally different, do you think NI would let it fly? I doubt it. They had to pick someone without the resources to fight back.

your blind they are laid out way different
and why would they copy tone 2 and not uhe ?
they copy massive companys hardware synths and controllers like arturia etc so what your saying is crap -just take it or leave it stop getting angry

it looks nice , get it it don’t.

[concealed identity]

I wonder why they took down the page if there’s no problem with it?

Well people here had issues getting it registered at first, and it also seemed like you needed the standalone installed to register it, which was probably not intentional. There were also some website issues trying to get a license. Would be hilarious though if the page went back up and the synth looked completely different.

[Greenstorm33]

It's like the 3 blind men and the elephant.
One says, "it's a Tone2 Saurus copy!"
Another says, "it's an Ableton Analog copy!"
The third says, "it's an AAS Ultra Analog copy!"

But they're all right, and wrong at the same time.
Because really, it's just another Behringer.

Either way it's further evidence that the vast majority of the people at the company have not come up with an original idea in their entire lives.

And yet they have figured out ways to make vintage sounding Synths at low price points and have come up with all new synth designs

Why haven't other companies been able to do the same? Even when they are reissuing their own synth designs?

And what is so unique about Saurus? It's an emulation after all

Functionally nothing. It's the UI that is similar and I'm convinced half of the people here need glasses since they insist they can't see it. The color scheme is extremely similar, the knobs are almost identical, the (AFAIK) fairly distinct small square buttons are there. It's so similar that I saw multiple people outside this thread speculate that tone2 was involved when in fact they had nothing to do with it. And that's the only problem. It looks like their stuff and it's not. If they released something that looked this similar to Massive, even if it were functionally different, do you think NI would let it fly? I doubt it. They had to pick someone without the resources to fight back.

your blind they are laid out way different
and why would they copy tone 2 and not uhe ?
they copy massive companys hardware synths and controllers like arturia etc so what your saying is crap -just take it or leave it stop getting angry

it looks nice , get it it don’t.

Layout is irrelevant. The question is "could this be reasonably mistaken for a tone2 product or collaboration," and to me and apparently many others the answer is a pretty clear "yes."

And yeah, flat-out copying a currently operating company's midi controller is a great thing to do. Amazing company. Anything legal is ethical, am I right? I don't get you people.

[Danilo Villanova]

My first thought when I saw the plugin was "wow, so cool of Tone2 to collab with Behringer for their first VST release!". Then I heard it in a video and thought "damn, I didn't know Tone2 sounded like a cheap piece of crap, I'm never buying anything from them!".

If it wasn't for this thread, I would have never known...

[KVRforumRulez]

The big Behr enters the VA fray! The world will never be the same again!

It's one of those peculiar occasions where, when someone adds something to an environment, the environment is going to shrink.

Interesting... you mean the big Behr making a foothold in the VA market? Oddly enough, I'm not worried at all. I will be sticking with tried and true devs.

[audiojunkie]

Maybe they're making progress on that free DAW they announced a few years ago?

After seeing this plugin, do you still want the free DAW?

This!!!

Well said!

yes plugin looks great
what is wrong with you guys ?

We have taste.

[audiojunkie]

It's like the 3 blind men and the elephant.
One says, "it's a Tone2 Saurus copy!"
Another says, "it's an Ableton Analog copy!"
The third says, "it's an AAS Ultra Analog copy!"

But they're all right, and wrong at the same time.
Because really, it's just another Behringer.

why does it matter who they copied , everyone will still download it , personally i think
they look nothing alike the behringer looks far superior in design
and having not tried it yet that’s all i can say

Pumped for the daw

I’m going to take a wild guess that you are under twenty.

[audiojunkie]

I wonder why they took down the page if there’s no problem with it?

My synths! The buttons do nothing!
behringer.png

Speaking of tasteless copying, the keyboard controller in the picture is such a blatant knockoff that it was mentioned in several tech journals. Anyone want to venture a guess at what company’s keyboard controller got copied? I’ll give you a hint……..starts with an “A”.

[Greenstorm33]

I wonder why they took down the page if there’s no problem with it?

My synths! The buttons do nothing!
behringer.png

Speaking of tasteless copying, the keyboard controller in the picture is such a blatant knockoff that it was mentioned in several tech journals. Anyone want to venture a guess at what company’s keyboard controller got copied? I’ll give you a hint……..starts with an “A”.

At least they changed the color scheme on that one

[audiojunkie]

I wonder why they took down the page if there’s no problem with it?

Well people here had issues getting it registered at first, and it also seemed like you needed the standalone installed to register it, which was probably not intentional. There were also some website issues trying to get a license. Would be hilarious though if the page went back up and the synth looked completely different.

Agreed! That would completely make my day!