agreed.HansM wrote:Yes. Me too, and I believe strongly that most people need to study it. Maybe there are very few naturals, but most people need to study to understand harmony and the other aspects you mentioned. Although in the end it's still trying things and listening to the results. But there's less trying when you have a bit of background.3*s wrote:[...] Arranging is more of an intellectual thing for me. I had to study other songs form, orchestration, ensemble techniques, etc, to get good at it. I think this is key if you're a newbie to arranging, or if you have a specific sound you want to achieve. Once you learn how styles are structures, you start to be able to "control" your arrangements. Everything about the sound you can achieve consciously, without running into brick walls, and thinking "this doesn't flow right," or it needs to be longer," or it's "too repetitive."
--HansM
I did a lot of studying and can arrange for bigbands. I think the problem is not in instrumentation as such, but in getting the most of the given 4 bars (or sometimes 8 and a crappy bridge).
What I'm doing now (and would need help at) is face-lifting the turd (but it pays).
I guess it's just so much easier doing my own stuff.
Steven West wrote:But yeah, if it's 'arranging' just the minimal framework is all that's needed, and then offer and accept ideas from there. I know it's a bitch to do, and it makes me 'feel dirty'... But if there's grubby money involved, slap my ass and call me a whore then! HiHi
k
