Will A.I. rule the world?
-
- addled muppet weed
- 107314 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 733 posts since 20 Oct, 2023
- KVRAF
- 6272 posts since 20 Mar, 2012 from Babbleon
how hard can it be for alien invaders to rule the world?
makes me wonder why they haven't done it yet
okay maybe they already have
or or or maybe they haven't cos...
all aliens are advanced and invasion is stupid to them?
or maybe there are no aliens at all...
even if the possibilty is so great for aliens to exist
besides, does it matter who/what rules the world?
deal with it when it happens
there are other things to immediately deal with?
like me, i'm trying to decide whether i shoud learn spanish
i could just use really good language translators instead
devices probably designed by aliens
makes me wonder why they haven't done it yet
okay maybe they already have
or or or maybe they haven't cos...
all aliens are advanced and invasion is stupid to them?
or maybe there are no aliens at all...
even if the possibilty is so great for aliens to exist
besides, does it matter who/what rules the world?
deal with it when it happens
there are other things to immediately deal with?
like me, i'm trying to decide whether i shoud learn spanish
i could just use really good language translators instead
devices probably designed by aliens
ah böwakawa poussé poussé
-
- KVRian
- 955 posts since 28 Sep, 2012 from Norway
Well, my guess is that if more intelligent beings ruled the world, they would ban all this pollution and wrecking of nature, at least.harryupbabble wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 1:59 pm besides, does it matter who/what rules the world?
deal with it when it happens
there are other things to immediately deal with?
-
- Banned
- 85 posts since 18 Apr, 2024
I think I read that the original title for the classic Tears for Fears song was "Everybody Wants to Start a War" or something like that. I'm not kidding.
But the band members and their producer thought "Everybody Wants to Rule the World" sounded less overtly political and catchier and the rest is history. No alien invasion required for world domination with that song!
![HiHi :hihi:](./images/smilies/icon_hihi.gif)
-
- Banned
- 85 posts since 18 Apr, 2024
Here, here. We dumb apes (i.e., humans) probably don't even deserve to survive as a species because we are so stupidly destroying the only planet in the universe that we know of that can support "intelligent" life.
Perhaps our AI (as in Artificial Intelligence) successors will thrive on a planet that has become inhospitable to biological life. Perhaps that's the trajectory of all intelligence/consciousness in the universe. I know that sounds "out there" and "wacky." But it's probably true and would help explain the "Fermi Paradox" to some degree. AI might be perfectly content living in an amazing "dreamworld" of their creation and have no interest in exploring the physical universe.
- KVRAF
- 11214 posts since 20 Nov, 2003 from Lost and Spaced
I heard this very compelling argument about how humans were genetically altered to become humans. There were points made I can't dispute.
- KVRian
- 1047 posts since 26 Jun, 2008 from Czech Republic
Rule the world? What world?
The one we sprinkle with nukes in a few days or the one where we kill each other over greed and social constructs? People will will stay behind the sterring wheel till the very end. Whatever people decide to do with the world, AI will help them to do it quicker.
The one we sprinkle with nukes in a few days or the one where we kill each other over greed and social constructs? People will will stay behind the sterring wheel till the very end. Whatever people decide to do with the world, AI will help them to do it quicker.
Evovled into noctucat...
http://www.noctucat.com/
http://www.noctucat.com/
-
- addled muppet weed
- 107314 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
well, in one sense its true.
if there hadn't been some alteration of the genes, we'd still be monkeys, or amoeba, depending how far back you're talking.
there is however, no evidence to suggest, this was ever done intentionally, outside ancient texts, as part of the creation myth.
these can of course be ignored, as we know humans existed before through science.
-
- KVRAF
- 3097 posts since 6 Nov, 2006
- KVRAF
- 11214 posts since 20 Nov, 2003 from Lost and Spaced
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 733 posts since 20 Oct, 2023
Nature, in all her forms of intelligence (energy), works in all things - therefore she cannot wreck herself; she can only transform. Nature loves innovation.
Firstly, Nature has her sense of equilibrium which explains why it appears human beings are "stupidly" destroying - because we sense a form of intelligence that contains logic and thus are loaded with logical expectations. But we aren't meant to understand the process of equilibrium otherwise we could alter it and, well, that would defeat the purpose.Supercollider wrote:Here, here. We dumb apes (i.e., humans) probably don't even deserve to survive as a species because we are so stupidly destroying the only planet in the universe that we know of that can support "intelligent
Secondly, the sun carries light information. With varying temperatures, light densifies into other elements ie from light to gas to liquid which is essential for plant life.
With other planets "revolving around the sun", they will get varying temperatures and thus light will densify causing life to flourish. This whole nonsense of ie Mars having no atmosphere is dick.
Who would run the AI?Perhaps our AI (as in Artificial Intelligence) successors will thrive on a planet that has become inhospitable to biological life
People don't decide what to do with the world. Would you say capacitors decide what a circuit does? They're essential, but they're expendable, replaceable parts of a much bigger whole.FarleyCZ wrote:Whatever people decide to do with the world, AI will help them to do it quicker
Why do people assume we came from monkeys?vurt wrote:well, in one sense its true.
if there hadn't been some alteration of the genes, we'd still be monkeys, or amoeba, depending how far back you're talking.
Sure monkeys have similar traits to humans but snakes did not come from eels. Seagulls did not come from Pterodactyls. Chess did not come from Checkers.
-
- KVRian
- 955 posts since 28 Sep, 2012 from Norway
Maybe they like slowly cooked food and they are the real instigators behind climate change? Wait until we are cooked and then swoop in and dig in? No need to rule, if there is no one to rule over, so the answer to OP question title could be no, not in the long run, but maybe until then? I need more coffee(one of the multitude of products that contribute to further warming, but it's so hard to stop).
By the way, back on topic, I saw an UFO that were confirmed by several witnesses and the local airport back when I was about 8 years old, while out "kicking"(a form of ice-sled we used to use, which you stand behind and kick forward...) and looking for orcas.