How to harden a kick?

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Effects Discussion
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Pinkfloydian5 wrote: Fri May 31, 2024 11:59 am
TIMT wrote: Fri May 31, 2024 12:12 am Nothing constructive to add. Just my confusion about peoples obsession with Psy Tarnce kick drums. and why such a simple gimmick ridden genre is placed at the upper echelon of production prowess. Never seen anybody faff over saw basses and literal pitch zaps as much as Psy Trance producers do :shrug: :zzz: :tantrum:
very easy: it only appears as "obsession" if you are being so figurative because you have never worked a kick at 0 dbs. Put a kick at -5 dbs and then turn it up to 0, and realize how fragil it becomes to eq. If you don't realize it and you keep thinking the same thing, well, you know you're still confused.
Best to not assume what I have or have not worked on, or what i do and do not know. not about to lay out my entire CV to some forum rando who simply can't stand the idea that somebody does not hold certain production as in high esteem as they do, but it'll be egg on ya face etc :P . i simply don't like modern Psy Trance or its production conventions( i do like a lot of the stuff before Infected Mushroom turned the entire genre into a gimmick though. e.g Banzai Records early German Goa, the Psy Breaks movement etc) or understand the obsession with the pitch zaps. it is literally a pitch zap with uniform phase throughout. the only thing making it a kick is the envelope "yeah, but all kicks are pitch zaps"not really, but i'm not getting into that one...

If a kick sounds "bigger"to you at -5dB than at full scale, or falls apart moreso at full scale then it's pretty obvious the kick you prefer has a smaller crest factor and much less dynamics than it appears to have. or you are doing what most people do when it comes to kicks and confusing how the kick sounds after limiting, and clipping of the stereo master, versus what the kick sounds like in isolation. which means you should look into things like parallel compression, limiting, and soft saturation, or focus on getting the kick to sit as tight as you need through the stereo master processing (shouldn't take anything more than a bit of limiting, EQ, and soft clipping to tuck away some of the stray samples).

Psy Tarnce kicks from what little i've subjected myself to from time to time are pretty clean and are probably not abusing saturation or 1176 type compression to get the crest factor down, so there's not likely much of a mystery there as to how they can shrink the crest factor, without bloating the waveform too much. the sound is completely tonal with very little in the way of inharmonics or overtones. there is not much of anything you can do to it processing wise that would allow you to get away with pretty heavy handed processing to creep the perceived loudness up, so Occam's razor tells me that they are probably using parallel processing, or processing that does not produce a high order of harmonics like compressors with look-ahead and long attack times/volume envelope shaping, soft saturation, and juggling that with the master processing to get the desired amount of perceived sustain versus attack when the kick interacts with everything else
I

Post

TIMT wrote: Fri May 31, 2024 12:12 am Nothing constructive to add. Just my confusion about peoples obsession with Psy Tarnce kick drums. and why such a simple gimmick ridden genre is placed at the upper echelon of production prowess. Never seen anybody faff over saw basses and literal pitch zaps as much as Psy Trance producers do :shrug: :zzz: :tantrum:
Theres definitely some truth in this. It's not like psytrance has the most banging or impactful drums.

To me there's an element of EDMification going on. Lots of people arriving towards a clean, strong, but ultimately vanilla kick, and bass/drum KbbbKbbbKbbbKbbb.

When you his happens the homogenity starts to outweigh the creativity. Production over creativity is a real issue in much electronic music though, not just psy.

Post

I'm not into psy or any other trance in general but I mostly hear pretty clean sine kicks with very heavy ducking of other elements of the mix giving them the impression of impact while being almost inaudible past the attack or "beater" portion of the kick. Pretty much micro tonic and maybe a compressor with fast time settings would be all anyone could need.

I've never kept up with every sub genre/ flavor of psy trance by any means, so I could be oversimplifying things. I have mixed and mastered a few psy trance projects though so I'm not completely ignorant. It very much sounds like over thinking leading to over processing.
Don't F**K with Mr. Zero.

Post

bmanic wrote: Thu May 23, 2024 11:11 pm As with any genre ever it's all about the sum of all parts. The kick will be perceived relative to every other instrument or audio source in the whole mix!
Lol
If you are only comparing kicks in isolation, meaning there is absolutely nothing else playing, then it's a different matter. Then it's down to the sample content itself mainly and of course also the processing.. but for 99% of the time, if you are talking about a kick within a mix, the mix quality itself is by far the biggest contributor.
There's a lot of truth in this. I would add the following more general thoughts.

It is possible to start with a banging kick and write and mix a track that stays out of the way - but doing this may limit the things that will work for other parts with bass and/or low miss.

Sometimes a more middling kick is better to start with so you can have more musical freedom, then you can come back later and change or modify the kick to work in the mix.

Another thing to bear in mind is that a kick may sound brilliant on its own, but just be a bit too long when other elements are present. Sometimes you just need two versions of this, the long one when you want that kick impact, and a shorter one for when the mix is busier in the low end.

The bass you want make a huge difference as well. Sometimes you only need a short punchy kick to drive the low end, and don't need much, if any, thump as the bass does that.

It can also very genre specific topic, which I think is a bit unfortunate tbh. Personally I won't conform to the 'a techno track must have this type of kick'. I make the music that I want, but regardless the mix and the low end still needs to work - that's inescapable.

Post



Dash Glitch heard the TS.

Post

TIMT wrote: Fri May 31, 2024 6:44 pm
Pinkfloydian5 wrote: Fri May 31, 2024 11:59 am
TIMT wrote: Fri May 31, 2024 12:12 am Nothing constructive to add. Just my confusion about peoples obsession with Psy Tarnce kick drums. and why such a simple gimmick ridden genre is placed at the upper echelon of production prowess. Never seen anybody faff over saw basses and literal pitch zaps as much as Psy Trance producers do :shrug: :zzz: :tantrum:
very easy: it only appears as "obsession" if you are being so figurative because you have never worked a kick at 0 dbs. Put a kick at -5 dbs and then turn it up to 0, and realize how fragil it becomes to eq. If you don't realize it and you keep thinking the same thing, well, you know you're still confused.
Best to not assume what I have or have not worked on, or what i do and do not know. not about to lay out my entire CV to some forum rando who simply can't stand the idea that somebody does not hold certain production as in high esteem as they do, but it'll be egg on ya face etc :P . i simply don't like modern Psy Trance or its production conventions( i do like a lot of the stuff before Infected Mushroom turned the entire genre into a gimmick though. e.g Banzai Records early German Goa, the Psy Breaks movement etc) or understand the obsession with the pitch zaps. it is literally a pitch zap with uniform phase throughout. the only thing making it a kick is the envelope "yeah, but all kicks are pitch zaps"not really, but i'm not getting into that one...

If a kick sounds "bigger"to you at -5dB than at full scale, or falls apart moreso at full scale then it's pretty obvious the kick you prefer has a smaller crest factor and much less dynamics than it appears to have. or you are doing what most people do when it comes to kicks and confusing how the kick sounds after limiting, and clipping of the stereo master, versus what the kick sounds like in isolation. which means you should look into things like parallel compression, limiting, and soft saturation, or focus on getting the kick to sit as tight as you need through the stereo master processing (shouldn't take anything more than a bit of limiting, EQ, and soft clipping to tuck away some of the stray samples).

Psy Tarnce kicks from what little i've subjected myself to from time to time are pretty clean and are probably not abusing saturation or 1176 type compression to get the crest factor down, so there's not likely much of a mystery there as to how they can shrink the crest factor, without bloating the waveform too much. the sound is completely tonal with very little in the way of inharmonics or overtones. there is not much of anything you can do to it processing wise that would allow you to get away with pretty heavy handed processing to creep the perceived loudness up, so Occam's razor tells me that they are probably using parallel processing, or processing that does not produce a high order of harmonics like compressors with look-ahead and long attack times/volume envelope shaping, soft saturation, and juggling that with the master processing to get the desired amount of perceived sustain versus attack when the kick interacts with everything else
Not going to read that. You're the best. 👌🏻

Post

RPH wrote: Sat Jun 01, 2024 5:35 am

Dash Glitch heard the TS.
Yesterday i watched it. I really think he is –mmm i don't know the word; don't wanna say "roockie" because it is a matter of simple try/effort –but he don't know what he is talking about. He said that cutting lows is problematic (so better let them be there). Well because he didn't spend time searching the right point(s) –and in in order to said that, i suppossed he is no exploring enough equalizing. Kicks needs A LOT of eq (starting in kick2 amp nodes). But thank you (and god hahaha because E clip created his channel. It allows to grow up faster and straight. Finally managed to achieved it. A stable kick and with inner strength adequate. Thanks to all! :)!!!! )
Last edited by Pinkfloydian5 on Sat Jun 01, 2024 9:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post

You started this thread asking for advice, but now you act like you know it all? What a bad joke.
Dash knows what he’s talking about, clearly you don’t.
Kicks don’t need lots of EQ, that’s bs, and amp nodes in Kick2 are for shaping the volume. I’m out.

Post

RPH wrote: Sat Jun 01, 2024 9:41 pm You started this thread asking for advice, but now you act like you know it all? What a bad joke.
Dash knows what he’s talking about, clearly you don’t.
Kicks don’t need lots of EQ, that’s bs, and amp nodes in Kick2 are for shaping the volume. I’m out.
No bro. I think Dash is VERY good. His songs sound clean as f. What i'm saying is that kick is the most laborious element. And for some reason he is using kick samples (also i think, compared with e clip kicks and others i heard as loud and zen mechanics: those samples he used are good but not THAT good). So if you tell me, in which dude i'm going to believe, i choose the experience of e clip. If he is cutting the lows, i think he has good reasons for doing that. I also tought in some point the same thing about that, but if i saw E clip cutting, well...
And yes, i had a problem few days ago, now i think i achieve it. I hear a difference with dash' kicks doing a different method. And i'm happy with the result. But you are free to believe to him ;) thank you anyway, really.

Just one thing more: kicks needs alot of eq. The samples he is using are superprocessed. That is equializing. Multiband transient shapers, r bass and so on, multiband compression, all those are equalizing the kick to shape it, make it coherent and reduce the flabbiness. But don't believe in me, dash or anyone. Try for yourself.

Post

Very interesting thread and agree with a lot of points mentioned.
I personally hate spending too much time eq-ing my kicks as I find it very tiring for the hears. I generally try to reuse my kicks when I was happy with my previous ones and rework them during mixing to make them sit better in the mix.
I am no expert but I generally use a mix of Saturn 2 (for transient shaping and adding harmonics) and multiband compression.

I don't use layering at all for kicks as I always end up with phase issues...

Post

watch some porn...usually does a hardening trick :tu:

Post Reply

Return to “Effects”