Nuendo vs Sonar again
-
- KVRist
- 42 posts since 26 Oct, 2004
since theres newer versions out that havent been out for long, which ones would you think are better, im lookin into buyin a good sequencer, ive tried Nuendo 2 and Sonar 3, i liked Nuendo 2 more but from what ive read automation is better now in Sonar 4, i have not tried any of these, i want to see if the new Sonar got good enough
-
Stupid American Pig Stupid American Pig https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=4753 - KVRAF
- 7065 posts since 25 Nov, 2002 from not sure
If you dont have 2 grand, get sonar. If you do have 2 grand get sonar 
-
- KVRAF
- 6323 posts since 30 Dec, 2004 from London uk
Nuendo isnt just a sequencer and if thats what you want, it over the top. It does post production work. A better comparison is Sonar vs Cubase.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 42 posts since 26 Oct, 2004
soo ur sayin Nuendo also is good for audio editing, more like multitracking and mastering kind of. and you would take Sonar over Cubase?
-
- KVRAF
- 6323 posts since 30 Dec, 2004 from London uk
Nuendo is a high end audio application, it has true surround sound capability. Most people use it instead of protools. Yes it has multitracking, 64 bit broadcast wav format and many options geared towards the film industry. I prefer Nuendo over Cubase as I use adobe premiere. I prefer Cubase AND Nunedo over Sonar.
-
- KVRist
- 495 posts since 5 Sep, 2002 from Boston, Mass
Sonar is a high end audio application, it has true surround sound capability. Most people use it instead of protools. Yes it has multitracking, More flexible bus routing and many options geared towards the film industry. I prefer Sonar over Cubase as I use Sony Vegas. I prefer Sonar AND Sonar over Steinberg products.
If it sounds good it is good.
-
- KVRAF
- 2875 posts since 28 Jan, 2004 from Da Nang, Vietnam
A better comparison would be Cubase and Sonar. Try to demo them both and see what you like better. They're both good.
-
- KVRist
- 72 posts since 8 Feb, 2004 from Seattle/Portland USA
Heh, nice echo parameterization.EricRichmond wrote:Sonar is a high end audio application, it has true surround sound capability. Most people use it instead of protools. Yes it has multitracking, More flexible bus routing and many options geared towards the film industry. I prefer Sonar over Cubase as I use Sony Vegas. I prefer Sonar AND Sonar over Steinberg products.
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=67988
Don't forget that Pinnacle just dumped, er, I mean "sold", Steinberg to Yamaha, who will undoubtedly use their great software expertise to make Nuendo better.
-
- KVRAF
- 1907 posts since 29 Oct, 2003
Nintendo 
-
maxxxter maxxxter https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=1
DELETED
-
maxxxter maxxxter https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=1
DELETED
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 42 posts since 26 Oct, 2004
funny comparison with Ultra and Eric they both sound like they do the same lol. keep coming at the opinions i think nuendo is a bit more professional that sonar, baisically i think all of steinberg's products are very good i cant doubt any of them.
-
- KVRist
- 495 posts since 5 Sep, 2002 from Boston, Mass
hahaha yeah, I purposely framed it that way just to mess around.
I think 'more professional' is a subjective term tho, Can you produce a cd using Sonar... YES, can you produce a cd using Cubase/Nuendo... YES. So at that point it really comes down to workflow.
Nuendo does have some more niche/esoteric features above and beyond Sonar and Cubase, but at 2-3 times the price, thats pretty much to be expected.
I think 'more professional' is a subjective term tho, Can you produce a cd using Sonar... YES, can you produce a cd using Cubase/Nuendo... YES. So at that point it really comes down to workflow.
Nuendo does have some more niche/esoteric features above and beyond Sonar and Cubase, but at 2-3 times the price, thats pretty much to be expected.
If it sounds good it is good.
-
- Beware the Quoth
- 35476 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
maxxxter quoth And it's a REAL vst host. No compatibility issues.
I currently have 264 different plugins available to Sonar, from a very wide spectrum of developers. With no compatibility problems. I have used and tested hundreds more.
The one developer who's plugins consistently give problems in other hosts, including Sonar? Steinberg.
Funny that; can't even stick to their own standard. Not a good sign.
What was that about compatibility again?
I currently have 264 different plugins available to Sonar, from a very wide spectrum of developers. With no compatibility problems. I have used and tested hundreds more.
The one developer who's plugins consistently give problems in other hosts, including Sonar? Steinberg.
Funny that; can't even stick to their own standard. Not a good sign.
What was that about compatibility again?
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- KVRist
- 460 posts since 14 Mar, 2004 from Colorado, USA
Nuendo/Cubase own Sonar's a$$!
... my dad can beat up your dad...
... my dad can beat up your dad...
Core i9-7940X | Asus Prime X299-A | 64GB DDR4-3200 | Samsung 950 Pro 2TB Sys, 860 Evo 4TB Data | Steinberg UR824 & CC121 | Virus TI Desktop | Roli Seabord Rise 2 | Nektar Panorama P6 | Nektar Aura | Roland VG-99 | Win10 Pro x64 | Cubase Pro 12