Ok, but that doesn't sound like a good work around. Better if you talk to Mike againFigBug wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2025 2:25 pmAs a work around you could duplicate the oscillator a few times so it feeds the layer multiple times and then set the layer to use a random oscuillator.mynet wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2025 2:12 pm So then imo its pretty useless because you hear the repetitiveness then and you don’t get the real randomness! I changed my previous post to explain. I really wonder what the reason is for it to work this way.
Curious what Manuel thinks about this.
And pls consider the sample fav system, SOOO much potential. To many good samples to just memorize where they are!
