I don't get, really. While I do not know how the Chinese (Russian) 'firewall' is configured, I do know that I can prevent ANY ingress traffic on ALL ports. You know, there are so many new Chinese engineers every year out of universities in China.
When you, as proprietary makers of software, can use any port you'd wish to use for TLS, you've chosen the standard 443 port that everybody, and their aunts and uncles, know. Granted, any port using TLS can be identified as such, might as well use 443 but, I do not see the basis for your argument that TLS on 443 will help with "communication issues for customers in countries with restrictive firewalls, such as China, Russia, the UAE, Vietnam, and others."
As if these governments had no idea what TLS is and are easily defeated by simply encrypting communications. Wouldn't a VPN used by these customers be more helpful ?
How about a Melda VPN for these customers ? MVPNMB ?
