MuDrum: How to add third (or more) sample slot to a pad?

[fladd]

Each pad in MuDrum seems to have two sample slots. Is there a way to add more?

[Scrubbing Monkeys]

You should be able to go into the modular area and add anorher sample to the pad. Adding it to the front panel should be possible as well.

[fladd]

I managed to add the sampler, but I have no clue how to copy/paste the GUI part and connect it to that new sampler...

[Michael L]

... misunderstood OP ...

[MuTools]

I managed to add the sampler, but I have no clue how to copy/paste the GUI part and connect it to that new sampler...

Ideally a MUX Modular Front Panel could include child front panels.
But that's not yet supported, it's on the wishlist.

By the way: Sorry about the slow reply.
It's because i encountered a very difficult bug in the envelope system, especially when splitting automation clips. Already working a week on solving this in a proper way. Will need a couple of more days to hopefully finalize this.

[Scrubbing Monkeys]

Ideally a MUX Modular Front Panel could include child front panels.
But that's not yet supported, it's on the wishlist.

This would be a very welcome feature. We could build and save modules and combine them much easier....that mixer thingy comes to mind where you are essentially duplicating one module over and over.

[PelletProject]

I would've thought an easier way would be just to have Pad modules have a [+] button for any subsequent sampler one wants to add, plus an added [X] next to each one to remove them if need be, kinda like how adding Transforms works in the MFO.

To me, that would come across as more intuitive versus entrusting the user to create modules just to add another sampler, though not to say that approach wouldn't have its own merit and use cases either.

[Scrubbing Monkeys]

I would've thought an easier way would be just to have Pad modules have a [+] button for any subsequent sampler one wants to add, plus an added [X] next to each one to remove them if need be, kinda like how adding Transforms works in the MFO.

To me, that would come across as more intuitive versus entrusting the user to create modules just to add another sampler, though not to say that approach wouldn't have its own merit and use cases either.

Thats a solid idea.

[viceverser]

The way this is handled in TAL-Drum is maybe a good fit for this? Just an idea, might help inspire an elegant solution!