Omnisphere 3
- KVRAF
- 11950 posts since 31 Aug, 2013 from Someplace else
Hi, quick question for those who bought the boxed format:
What format does it ship in? Is there just a serial # in the box, HDD; SSD; memory stick?
Thanks.
What format does it ship in? Is there just a serial # in the box, HDD; SSD; memory stick?
Thanks.
“The Generals sat, and the lines on the map, moved from side to side.”
― Pink Floyd
― Pink Floyd
-
- KVRist
- 110 posts since 20 Mar, 2021
Single USB stick that is both USB A and C.Bombadil wrote: Thu Jan 15, 2026 7:56 pm Hi, quick question for those who bought the boxed format:
What format does it ship in? Is there just a serial # in the box, HDD; SSD; memory stick?
Thanks.
-
- KVRAF
- 5913 posts since 25 Jan, 2007
(if it's an upgrade it's just an envelope with a serial number in it)
http://www.guyrowland.co.uk
http://www.sound-on-screen.com
W11, Ryzen 7900, 64gb RAM, RME Babyface, 1050ti, PT 2024 Ultimate, Cubase Pro 14
Macbook Air M2 OSX 10.15
http://www.sound-on-screen.com
W11, Ryzen 7900, 64gb RAM, RME Babyface, 1050ti, PT 2024 Ultimate, Cubase Pro 14
Macbook Air M2 OSX 10.15
-
- KVRian
- 614 posts since 1 May, 2009
Aside from the top notch sound design, how is Ominisphere 3 as a general synth in quality, ease of use, and breadth? How is the quality of the filters and coverage of analog sounds? How is quality of the effects? It looks like a killer synth, but since it has no demo I'm trying to determine if it would be worth it for me, since it is obviously an expensive softsynth.
- KVRian
- 783 posts since 16 Jun, 2022
Quality of everything is great and it can cover anything from simple but authentic VA patches to very otherworldy sound designy stuff. The workflow for programming you own patches is... let's just say not for me. There's a lot of tabs to navigate and sub menus. However if you really want to learn it the power is there at the tip of your fingers - i'm spoiled by other modern options that have better workflows. The quality and size of the library is very impressive. I'm not a big preset guy but when I do use some Omnisphere is my go to.sellyoursoul wrote: Tue Jan 20, 2026 6:29 pm Aside from the top notch sound design, how is Ominisphere 3 as a general synth in quality, ease of use, and breadth? How is the quality of the filters and coverage of analog sounds? How is quality of the effects? It looks like a killer synth, but since it has no demo I'm trying to determine if it would be worth it for me, since it is obviously an expensive softsynth.
I make electronic music - DAW of choice : Live 12 
-
- KVRian
- 614 posts since 1 May, 2009
Thanks. On workflow, I prefer single page synths myself, or at least the main components on a single page, so that's definitely a consideration.HOTF wrote: Tue Jan 20, 2026 7:16 pm Quality of everything is great and it can cover anything from simple but authentic VA patches to very otherworldy sound designy stuff. The workflow for programming you own patches is... let's just say not for me. There's a lot of tabs to navigate and sub menus. However if you really want to learn it the power is there at the tip of your fingers - i'm spoiled by other modern options that have better workflows. The quality and size of the library is very impressive. I'm not a big preset guy but when I do use some Omnisphere is my go to.
-
- KVRian
- 614 posts since 1 May, 2009
Obviously Omnisphere has a lot of nice to have features, but I'm wondering where it might fall short in features as a general synth. What can Omnisphere not do?
- KVRian
- 783 posts since 16 Jun, 2022
Not much it cant do. Its a really powerful synth. Its less modular and open ended than something like uvi falcon. You cant create your own oscillator for example. Its made for musician not developers. Its also not sandboxy like phaseplant. Omnisphere supports FM, wavetable-style morphing, and additive-derived sources but its not like a dedicated synth of any of those stylessellyoursoul wrote: Tue Jan 20, 2026 8:14 pm Obviously Omnisphere has a lot of nice to have features, but I'm wondering where it might fall short in features as a general synth. What can Omnisphere not do?
I make electronic music - DAW of choice : Live 12 
-
- KVRAF
- 2780 posts since 24 Nov, 2023
If you are looking for a super simple synth where all of its features can be on a single page, Omnisphere isn't it, it's way to deep and powerfulsellyoursoul wrote: Tue Jan 20, 2026 7:27 pmThanks. On workflow, I prefer single page synths myself, or at least the main components on a single page, so that's definitely a consideration.HOTF wrote: Tue Jan 20, 2026 7:16 pm Quality of everything is great and it can cover anything from simple but authentic VA patches to very otherworldy sound designy stuff. The workflow for programming you own patches is... let's just say not for me. There's a lot of tabs to navigate and sub menus. However if you really want to learn it the power is there at the tip of your fingers - i'm spoiled by other modern options that have better workflows. The quality and size of the library is very impressive. I'm not a big preset guy but when I do use some Omnisphere is my go to.
Having said that Omnisphere has something they call the "adaptive Global controls" which is a single page where all of the common controls are and those come pre configured to many hardware controllers
Beyond that it's workflow is based around layering four different elements each one can be considered as it's own synth and has all of its main controls on a tabbed single page
I find the workflow to be pretty straightforward but like all workflows you either gel with it, or you don't. Some people for example love Falcon's UI and workflow, I despise it
As for how it is as a general synth, for me after several months of using it, it has become my go to general VA synth totally replacing DIVA. If you are looking for an exact emulation of something you would need to use a plugin that is an exact emulation of that specific synth but for general VA duties with a whole bunch of flavors it's awesome
Essentially it becomes up to 4 oscillator polysynth with an insane Modulation Matrix, a ton of fantastic filter options, and hundreds of available waveforms from vintage to modern, you can also use the Oscillator Drift control, and the vintage preamp, channel strips, and compressors to make it sound really vintage if you want or keep it clean and modern, and the new Unison modes are awesome
It's sample and synthesis engine along with the sample library is still the best available in a single plugin, however keep in mind it's geared towards taking a sample and using it to make a cool sound. So you won't find 50 different Violin samples, but you will find 50 different presets/sounds that have a violin sample inside of it
And that is probably the biggest limitation some people will find with it. If you are looking for specific acoustic instruments they will probably be in there but you won't have an extremely huge selection of samples if that specific instrument. Specific sample libraries for whatever you need/want is the way to go for that
-
- KVRist
- 151 posts since 10 Mar, 2009 from Australia
Can’t put my hands on the link ATM but there is also a good YouTube series on programming it. It might be a good investment of time looking at those.
Not enough time or talent. https://soundcloud.com/user-346125978?r ... rd&p=i&c=0 or https://soundcloud.com/richard-crane-64 ... rd&p=i&c=1
- KVRAF
- 11368 posts since 3 Feb, 2003 from Finland, Espoo
.. umm no, the modulation matrix pretty much the bog standard source -> target. You can not go several layers deep. It's got kind of two layers if you count the Depth knobs of the LFOs and Mod Envelopes.. but that's it. About as vanilla and bare bones as it gets.IvyBirds wrote: Tue Jan 20, 2026 10:42 pm Essentially it becomes up to 4 oscillator polysynth with an insane Modulation Matrix,
But there is still a lot of flexibility and control due to the numerous modulation sources and the minute detail the user has over keyboard tracking and velocity. This goes a long way in not needing a super deep mod matrix.
.. but I wouldn't mind one more extra layer of depth.
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
-
- KVRAF
- 2780 posts since 24 Nov, 2023
There are 51 Available Modulation Sources in Omnisphere 3 that you can send to over 300 targetsbmanic wrote: Wed Jan 21, 2026 6:00 am.. umm no, the modulation matrix pretty much the bog standard source -> target. You can not go several layers deep. It's got kind of two layers if you count the Depth knobs of the LFOs and Mod Envelopes.. but that's it. About as vanilla and bare bones as it gets.IvyBirds wrote: Tue Jan 20, 2026 10:42 pm Essentially it becomes up to 4 oscillator polysynth with an insane Modulation Matrix,
But there is still a lot of flexibility and control due to the numerous modulation sources and the minute detail the user has over keyboard tracking and velocity. This goes a long way in not needing a super deep mod matrix.
.. but I wouldn't mind one more extra layer of depth.
When it comes to sources
DIVA has 17
Oberheim Matrix 12 has 27
Minimoog had 4
Prophet 5 had 6
Jupiter 8 had 7
Most people would think 51 is insane, especially compared with 4,6,7 or 17 but you do you
51 sources and 300+ destinations including deep integration of hardware controllers for Modulation including MPE, and CC if you want it, in a pretty kick ass sounding four Oscillator VA synth engine offers insane sound design options, especially compared with the Analog Hardware Synths I am emulating and other VA plugins I have extensive experience with like DIVA but again you do you
I can't think of a single VA synth that offers more
-
- KVRian
- 614 posts since 1 May, 2009
HOTF wrote: Tue Jan 20, 2026 10:40 pm Not much it cant do. Its a really powerful synth. Its less modular and open ended than something like uvi falcon. You cant create your own oscillator for example. Its made for musician not developers. Its also not sandboxy like phaseplant. Omnisphere supports FM, wavetable-style morphing, and additive-derived sources but its not like a dedicated synth of any of those styles
My main softsynth is Reason's Thor, and if I want something more analog sounding, Repro. I guess I'm trying to determine whether Omnisphere would be worth it to me, covering those in features + effects at a minimum and going further in covering territories of other analog and digital synths of interest (not so much direct emulations). Feature wise, Thor is pretty good for my needs. Sound level wise, Repro is pretty good, but it's next next level, future convolution-based analog synths.IvyBirds wrote: Tue Jan 20, 2026 10:42 pm If you are looking for a super simple synth where all of its features can be on a single page, Omnisphere isn't it, it's way to deep and powerful
That's a good idea. I'll see if I can find that.rACatkvr wrote: Wed Jan 21, 2026 1:51 am Can’t put my hands on the link ATM but there is also a good YouTube series on programming it. It might be a good investment of time looking at those.
- KVRian
- 783 posts since 16 Jun, 2022
There is not that much overlap between thor, Repro and Omnisphere in my books. They can all do basic VA stuff but they are very different products. Omni is way more vast than the other 2 you can create more detailed and layered patches. It has more soundsources, more layers, more effects, more filters more everything. With all that power you will sacrifice some of the immediacy of Repro and Thor. I don't think Omni will replace those 2 it's just a different type of tool.sellyoursoul wrote: Wed Jan 21, 2026 1:48 pmHOTF wrote: Tue Jan 20, 2026 10:40 pm Not much it cant do. Its a really powerful synth. Its less modular and open ended than something like uvi falcon. You cant create your own oscillator for example. Its made for musician not developers. Its also not sandboxy like phaseplant. Omnisphere supports FM, wavetable-style morphing, and additive-derived sources but its not like a dedicated synth of any of those stylesMy main softsynth is Reason's Thor, and if I want something more analog sounding, Repro. I guess I'm trying to determine whether Omnisphere would be worth it to me, covering those in features + effects at a minimum and going further in covering territories of other analog and digital synths of interest (not so much direct emulations). Feature wise, Thor is pretty good for my needs. Sound level wise, Repro is pretty good, but it's next next level, future convolution-based analog synths.IvyBirds wrote: Tue Jan 20, 2026 10:42 pm If you are looking for a super simple synth where all of its features can be on a single page, Omnisphere isn't it, it's way to deep and powerful
That's a good idea. I'll see if I can find that.rACatkvr wrote: Wed Jan 21, 2026 1:51 am Can’t put my hands on the link ATM but there is also a good YouTube series on programming it. It might be a good investment of time looking at those.
I make electronic music - DAW of choice : Live 12 
