Difference between racks and sends?

Discussion about: tracktion.com
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Hi,

just wondering what the difference between racks and sends would really be at this time? Is this like senderella then?

RONC
Last edited by rpc9943 on Tue Jan 18, 2005 8:25 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post

from reading through this forum it seems it is senderella just fixed or made by jules

im getting bored of this tease now give me the fuking pussy :D

Post

Senderella is a creation of our very own ModuLR.

Racks can be used as sends, or not.

Does that answer the question? ;)

Greg
Image

Post

rpc9943 wrote:Hi,

just wondering what the difference between racks and sends would really be at this time? Is this like senderella then?

RONC
From what Beno said in the other thread, it sounds like when you drop a send filter on a track, it'll automatically create another track below to recieve that send. So it saves you some work and makes it very simple to use.
Image

Post

From what i read and i may have read it wrong there will be a send filter and a recieve filter so you can put the recieve filter whereever you like


Difference between Racks and sends well sends are hardwired to allow global FX to be used by any source whereas Racks are a crazy VST modular bastard from hell that nobody has even realised the potential of except Mod with his (Way too complex) modules ,Racks can quite easily be used as one of the most powerful modular synth FX units going the only really big feature missing is feedback and some sidechain routes aren't available.
Omerta

Post

Nu Audio Science wrote:Racks are a crazy VST modular bastard from hell that nobody has even realised the potential
I like your way of putting it :hihi:
Quote of the day: "If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost; you can still call him vile names."--Elbert Hubbard 1856-1915

Post

I cant help it im ill :D
Omerta

Post Reply

Return to “Tracktion”