With probability!
XLN Audio - XO - Improvement, Pros, Cons
-
- KVRist
- 248 posts since 1 May, 2006
- KVRist
- 475 posts since 26 Jun, 2024
I am hoping for that too. Different time signatures would be a good place to start.
I am of course lucky to have Logic’s very excellent step sequencer, but there I miss the swing per track that XO has. And the accent shaping below the sequencer in XO is priceless.
Basically if Logic would add swing per lane and time nudging per lane I probably wouldn’t look at XO’s sequencer ever again.. (but the accent shaping though.. )
-
- KVRist
- 272 posts since 6 Apr, 2024
1. At least 12 lanes (16 ideal), and use their AI to, or let the user, change the name
2. At least 8 custom patterns, switching available as DAW automation
3. Completely customizable pattern chaining of the (at least) 8 patterns
4. Step number adjustable per lane between 1 and 16
5. Nudge per step
6. Pitch per step
7. Sample reverse per step
8. Step ties
9. Modulation, per lane separate sources for sequencer and audio parameters
10. Ability for fine adjustment of parameter values (e.g. double click and manual enter)
11. Drag and drop samples onto sound pad
12. 3-band EQ per lane instead of the tone control tilt EQ
2. At least 8 custom patterns, switching available as DAW automation
3. Completely customizable pattern chaining of the (at least) 8 patterns
4. Step number adjustable per lane between 1 and 16
5. Nudge per step
6. Pitch per step
7. Sample reverse per step
8. Step ties
9. Modulation, per lane separate sources for sequencer and audio parameters
10. Ability for fine adjustment of parameter values (e.g. double click and manual enter)
11. Drag and drop samples onto sound pad
12. 3-band EQ per lane instead of the tone control tilt EQ
- KVRist
- 475 posts since 26 Jun, 2024
Some good suggestions in there for the sequencer for sure. 3 band eq per lane would be totally unnecessary clutter to me as tone control (which I thinks is a tilt eq) together with high- and lowpass filters do the trick already. Besides.. since it’s samples, sound selection should be key so that you pick sounds that go well together without to much trickery.
Just my opinion obviously.
Just my opinion obviously.
-
- KVRist
- 272 posts since 6 Apr, 2024
It's all about UI implementation. For example, the AHD envelope is clean as it is and doesn't not clutter the UI, and the edit features are hidden until you hover over it. You could do the same with a 3-band EQ. But you point about sound selection is certainly true.Morty-C-137 wrote: Thu Sep 04, 2025 6:36 pm Some good suggestions in there for the sequencer for sure. 3 band eq per lane would be totally unnecessary clutter to me as tone control (which I thinks is a tilt eq) together with high- and lowpass filters do the trick already. Besides.. since it’s samples, sound selection should be key so that you pick sounds that go well together without to much trickery.
Just my opinion obviously.
- KVRist
- 475 posts since 26 Jun, 2024
Yes, I suppose you are right about proper GUI implementation. Doesn’t necessarily have to clutter.oobesan wrote: Fri Sep 05, 2025 5:23 pmIt's all about UI implementation. For example, the AHD envelope is clean as it is and doesn't not clutter the UI, and the edit features are hidden until you hover over it. You could do the same with a 3-band EQ. But you point about sound selection is certainly true.Morty-C-137 wrote: Thu Sep 04, 2025 6:36 pm Some good suggestions in there for the sequencer for sure. 3 band eq per lane would be totally unnecessary clutter to me as tone control (which I thinks is a tilt eq) together with high- and lowpass filters do the trick already. Besides.. since it’s samples, sound selection should be key so that you pick sounds that go well together without to much trickery.
Just my opinion obviously.
-
- KVRAF
- 1819 posts since 10 Jul, 2018
If you don't want "clutter" then let us have a way to open a menu or change a setting to show these extra options. Tilt EQ + high and lowpass filters are really not adequate for my purposes. Even with a vast library of sounds, you'll get better results by EQing them before they go into XO's built-in FX. Of course the simplest workaround is to use sends instead, but then you can't use XO's bus processing. One solution would be to include XO's bus processing FX as a separate FX plugin.Morty-C-137 wrote: Thu Sep 04, 2025 6:36 pm Some good suggestions in there for the sequencer for sure. 3 band eq per lane would be totally unnecessary clutter to me as tone control (which I thinks is a tilt eq) together with high- and lowpass filters do the trick already. Besides.. since it’s samples, sound selection should be key so that you pick sounds that go well together without to much trickery.
Just my opinion obviously.
-
- KVRer
- 13 posts since 2 Jul, 2019
Does anyone know how or if it's possible to lock the samples and still switch presets?
The whole point for me using this thing is to randomize stuff and get results that you normalyl wouldn't. Not being able to basically randomize kits without losing the ones you like is such a workflow killer.
Atlas does this but I don't find the sorting that good as with xo
The whole point for me using this thing is to randomize stuff and get results that you normalyl wouldn't. Not being able to basically randomize kits without losing the ones you like is such a workflow killer.
Atlas does this but I don't find the sorting that good as with xo
-
- KVRAF
- 5913 posts since 25 Jan, 2007
Not as far as I know, which is annoying.JJRICH wrote: Sun Oct 12, 2025 9:18 pm Does anyone know how or if it's possible to lock the samples and still switch presets?
There is a way to go through the presets without loading their associated samples - go to the preset browser, open the search & filter box and put in a search term (eg 808). Then when you scroll through the presets, it auto loads a random kit using the selected search criteria. I love this undocumented feature which appeared at some point in an update, but it's obviously not the same as locking the samples when switching presets.
http://www.guyrowland.co.uk
http://www.sound-on-screen.com
W11, Ryzen 7900, 64gb RAM, RME Babyface, 1050ti, PT 2024 Ultimate, Cubase Pro 14
Macbook Air M2 OSX 10.15
http://www.sound-on-screen.com
W11, Ryzen 7900, 64gb RAM, RME Babyface, 1050ti, PT 2024 Ultimate, Cubase Pro 14
Macbook Air M2 OSX 10.15
-
- KVRian
- 1209 posts since 18 Dec, 2007
Yep, still not possible. I emailed them last year to confirm as it seems ridiculous to me that you can't, but you can't.JJRICH wrote: Sun Oct 12, 2025 9:18 pm Does anyone know how or if it's possible to lock the samples and still switch presets?
The whole point for me using this thing is to randomize stuff and get results that you normalyl wouldn't. Not being able to basically randomize kits without losing the ones you like is such a workflow killer.
Atlas does this but I don't find the sorting that good as with xo
When they told me it wasn't possible, I emailed them back saying I should have the ability to lock my samples and switch through the pattern presets from their expansions, just as I can with pretty every other drum sequencer I own. I mean, thats drum sequencer 101 to me, surely? Why have each expansion pack locked to using its own samples every time you want to use one of its midi patterns? Crazy. this is what they emailed back;
"Thanks for getting back to me. I understand your disappointment. Being able to switch to more patterns would definitely be great. I'm sure you already do this but what I usually do is open the Beat Combiner and select patterns for the different lanes there as starting points before my manual edits. But yes, there's of course a bit of a limit there as well since some of them are extracted from the preset you're currently on.
I've forwarded your message to the product team.
Don't hesitate to contact us again if you have any other questions or feedback."
I'd suggest emailing them to let them know this SHOULD be a feature. If we don't all make a noise about it, why would they bother adding more work for themselves? And for anyone thinking of purchasing any of their expansion packs, please be aware of this limitation before purchasing.
-
- KVRist
- 295 posts since 28 Jun, 2004
I absolutely agree. The reason it won't work well is because their presets don't follow a standard. Some presets might have Toms rimshots in the 2nd slot, some might have open hihats on 5th slot, sometimes kicks on the 3rd, etc.m-ac wrote: Sat Jun 20, 2026 1:00 pmYep, still not possible. I emailed them last year to confirm as it seems ridiculous to me that you can't, but you can't.JJRICH wrote: Sun Oct 12, 2025 9:18 pm Does anyone know how or if it's possible to lock the samples and still switch presets?
The whole point for me using this thing is to randomize stuff and get results that you normalyl wouldn't. Not being able to basically randomize kits without losing the ones you like is such a workflow killer.
Atlas does this but I don't find the sorting that good as with xo
When they told me it wasn't possible, I emailed them back saying I should have the ability to lock my samples and switch through the pattern presets from their expansions, just as I can with pretty every other drum sequencer I own. I mean, thats drum sequencer 101 to me, surely? Why have each expansion pack locked to using its own samples every time you want to use one of its midi patterns? Crazy. this is what they emailed back;
"Thanks for getting back to me. I understand your disappointment. Being able to switch to more patterns would definitely be great. I'm sure you already do this but what I usually do is open the Beat Combiner and select patterns for the different lanes there as starting points before my manual edits. But yes, there's of course a bit of a limit there as well since some of them are extracted from the preset you're currently on.
I've forwarded your message to the product team.
Don't hesitate to contact us again if you have any other questions or feedback."
I'd suggest emailing them to let them know this SHOULD be a feature. If we don't all make a noise about it, why would they bother adding more work for themselves? And for anyone thinking of purchasing any of their expansion packs, please be aware of this limitation before purchasing.
Some of their recent expansions are a little better at following a standard but the factory presets are all over the place.
My workaround to all of this has been letting Playbeat drive the patterns. I'll only save/favorite kits in TRIAZ that is close to GM spec. If I really like the kit but it doesn't fit the GM spec, I'll just rearrange to make it fit. Then I'm able to lock kits or whatever in TRIAZ while Playbeat drives the patterns. But yes, it's ridiculous that we have to do things like this. They should just refresh all their presets to follow a certain spec and just tag them as V2.
-
- KVRian
- 1209 posts since 18 Dec, 2007
That's exactly what I want! For example, let me browse some of the hip-hop midi patterns with my loaded drum and bass samples...happy accidents and all that. Anyway, I won't be purchasing any more expansions for XO unless that restrictions removed.JiggSaw wrote: Sat Jun 20, 2026 1:49 pm I absolutely agree. The reason it won't work well is because their presets don't follow a standard. Some presets might have Toms rimshots in the 2nd slot, some might have open hihats on 5th slot, sometimes kicks on the 3rd, etc.
-
- KVRist
- 295 posts since 28 Jun, 2004
Oops.. I actually wrote that for TRIAZm-ac wrote: Sat Jun 20, 2026 5:32 pmThat's exactly what I want! For example, let me browse some of the hip-hop midi patterns with my loaded drum and bass samples...happy accidents and all that. Anyway, I won't be purchasing any more expansions for XO unless that restrictions removed.JiggSaw wrote: Sat Jun 20, 2026 1:49 pm I absolutely agree. The reason it won't work well is because their presets don't follow a standard. Some presets might have Toms rimshots in the 2nd slot, some might have open hihats on 5th slot, sometimes kicks on the 3rd, etc.
