For a long time, Arturia let companies like U-He push the envelope of emulation quality to the next level and did nothing. They got slammed because their releases were lackluster. Cherry is similar, though more uneven. I think their biggest issue is that their emulations only emulate the feature set of a synthesizer, and not really the character.DrGonzo wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 3:13 pmYeah. At the moment NI and Cherry are the two getting pounded whatever they release. I wonder what will be next. Probably not u-he.machinesworking wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 3:05 pm I seriously have never been able to figure out the KVR gripe algorithm? 10-15 years ago Arturia was trashed every time they released anything, and NI could do no wrong. Now NI can do nothing right. I get being upset that NI have issues changing their GUIs for modern screens, but not to the point to where everything they do is garbage.![]()
U-He gets criticized for letting Diva get superseded by newer synths, including U-He's Repro. They get criticized for poor UX. They got a ton of criticism for taking 20 years between Zebra versions.
I think every developer gets criticized. Whether or not you think the criticism is justified is a matter of opinion. I'm down on N.I. because they basically stopped development on a lot of instruments that I liked a lot. I got excited that they started offering MIDI 2 controllers with polyphonic aftertouch, but then they did zero to support those features in their software offerings. It wouldn't surprise me if this new synth didn't support them either.
