Now you're just being sillydune_rave wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 4:39 am What's next? U-he could get the code of Synth1 and make a commercial synth from that...
What is Next for u-he?
-
ThoughtExperiment ThoughtExperiment https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=7790
- KVRian
- 1268 posts since 26 Jun, 2003 from UK
-
- KVRAF
- 3050 posts since 23 Jun, 2006 from Hungary
Its not silly. Synth1 is a dead project now. But If someone get the right to improve it, that can be interesting.ThoughtExperiment wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 7:37 amNow you're just being sillydune_rave wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 4:39 am What's next? U-he could get the code of Synth1 and make a commercial synth from that...![]()
Youtube channel: https://youtube.com/@SoftSynthPortal
-
Funkybot's Evil Twin Funkybot's Evil Twin https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=116627
- KVRAF
- 12512 posts since 16 Aug, 2006
I thought there was a good chance you were initially joking too. I wouldn't get my hopes up for a U-he Synth1. I don't work at U-he, but I can all but guarantee it's never going to happen. 
-
- KVRAF
- 5576 posts since 30 May, 2006 from Hollow Earth
Man! I hate to agree with pdxindypdxindy wrote: Thu May 21, 2026 2:58 pmI would say Repro is still a step ahead.D-Fusion wrote: Thu May 21, 2026 11:34 am Prophet 600 filter in repro 1 and 5
Repro is competing against many Prophet 5 Emulations that are cheaper these days so adding a Prophet 600 filter would put it one step ahead again![]()
![]()
ABEFLGMOPPRRST 
-
- KVRist
- 49 posts since 1 Aug, 2022
I think that Zebra 3 is such a behemoth that "what's next" should probably just be refining it and updating it, at least for another year
. That being said I wouldn't mind an update to hive 2
.
-
- KVRist
- 44 posts since 22 Jun, 2020
Ichiro Toda will not share his code.dune_rave wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 2:56 pmIts not silly. Synth1 is a dead project now. But If someone get the right to improve it, that can be interesting.ThoughtExperiment wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 7:37 amNow you're just being sillydune_rave wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 4:39 am What's next? U-he could get the code of Synth1 and make a commercial synth from that...![]()
- u-he
- 30249 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
-
- KVRAF
- 2783 posts since 3 Dec, 2006
Diva and Tyrell already supercedes Synth1dune_rave wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 2:56 pmIts not silly. Synth1 is a dead project now. But If someone get the right to improve it, that can be interesting.ThoughtExperiment wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 7:37 amNow you're just being sillydune_rave wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 4:39 am What's next? U-he could get the code of Synth1 and make a commercial synth from that...![]()
-
- KVRist
- 44 posts since 22 Jun, 2020
I’m a big fan of the aggressive MS 20 style filter on my Behringer K-2 and Arturia's emulation. I really wish divas BITE filter revision captured that specific MS 20 grit and character just a little bit more.
- KVRAF
- 8238 posts since 22 Sep, 2008 from Windsor. UK
I would love to see a basic sequencer functionality added to Diva. Something along the lines of the one in Sylenth would be ideal.
Soundcloud | Facebook |
-
Funkybot's Evil Twin Funkybot's Evil Twin https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=116627
- KVRAF
- 12512 posts since 16 Aug, 2006
I'm happy to hear more DIVA modules are on the horizon. I would personally love it if the filter cutoffs were raised, even if that meant using back end tricks to maintain legacy compatibility, I think that would be worthwhile. I'd really love for 64 to be center value for bipolar knobs, I consider it a long standing defect that 63 was chosen, resulting in out of tune patches with MIDI controllers with detented bipolar knobs. Eventually, a modern Mod Matrix would be my biggest wishlist for DIVA. I wouldn't mind some alternate analog envelopes either with more detailed scaling of the faster stages (a la RePro).
I'd still also love to get an SSM chipset in RePro-5 and the ability to individually increase filter, envelope, oscillator slop in RePro where the effect can be exaggerated. Not to mention polyphonic portamento and unison, which both exist in the Rev 4 so wouldn't be entirely out of place in RePro-5.
I'd still also love to get an SSM chipset in RePro-5 and the ability to individually increase filter, envelope, oscillator slop in RePro where the effect can be exaggerated. Not to mention polyphonic portamento and unison, which both exist in the Rev 4 so wouldn't be entirely out of place in RePro-5.
