t2 is too cheap

[aldi]

make it cost $500 so that i have more rights to expect trackfolders, grouping, PDC on auxtracks, timstretch, a fader on the auxsendicon, lockable clippositions, anchorpoints for clips, ....

[chriss]

Thats right!

[AndrewSimon]

I heard T3 will be at least $499

[paladium]

There is another program wich does just that for
the price you mentioned, now i think you are
in the wrong forum dude

[r-]

I hate when software comes out with lots of features done just right, at a very low price! Dang it! I'd much rather have expensive feature-bloat!

Actually, yes, all those features do sound great, but for now small but powerful and elegant is a wonderful thing.

Ryan
www.r-blog.com

[koolkeys]

There is another program wich does just that for
the price you mentioned, now i think you are
in the wrong forum dude

As was said, I'd rather have a stable app with the features that T or T2 have, then have an app full of bugs with all the extra "features." Truth is, T is just more stable than most out there. Argue if you want, but it only takes a trip to different forums to see this is true. Finish the product the right way, and I'll pay whatever the price may be.

I know you were lite-heartedly kidding, but I just wanted to comment since some users of other software try to merrit their app on the amount of features, which is usually bloatware. Really, come to me with an app that works well, with high stability, and I'll take a look with respect. Besides, with T there is only one programmer and T is more stable than many programs with whole teams. How can this be? I'll stick with T.

Koolkeys

P.S.- Although I would pay anything, I'll stick with the $199 and call it a deal for now.