KVR Audio

Hink · Post by **Hink** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:28 pm

but my intention was to buy software when i have the money (being a student, and not a rich one tbh)

wow what an idea, why didn't I think about that when I was a student. All though back then I would of had to break into a music store, but if I explained I was gonna pay for it when I had the money I'm sure the judge would understand

useruseruser · Post by **useruseruser** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 5:29 pm

cptgone wrote:It's not Microsoft the sample stamps are sent to.

Yeah. it goes to the Consortium directly.

jens · Post by **jens** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 7:32 pm

hink wrote:
but my intention was to buy software when i have the money (being a student, and not a rich one tbh)
wow what an idea, why didn't I think about that when I was a student. All though back then I would of had to break into a music store, but if I explained I was gonna pay for it when I had the money I'm sure the judge would understand

Hink, I think you misunderstood him:

joehaann wrote:
serge wrote:
joehaann wrote:Lo,

was wondering if anyone knows about netlabels and 'legal issues', with this i mean; is it possible for anyone to release tracks on a netlabel that are made with software not legally obtained?

*curious*
Hey Joehaann, stealing is not the answer. Spread your wealth, convert your illegal software collection into legal by sending lots of money to all the happy developers who made those appz for you!! Spread the !!

serge
this wasnt the issue really, cuz it doesn't concern me (besides for the essay)

but yea, apart from that, i do have some stuff here - but my intention was to buy software when i have the money (being a student, and not a rich one tbh) and send it to a -regular- label.. whats the point of netlabels anyway.