CPU % low, but I'm still getting the "!" ...any id
-
- KVRist
- 358 posts since 3 Dec, 2004
As the subject says, my CPU is only like 20-25% when I'm running a bunch of tracks, but when things like guitar solos and extra short tracks kick in I get the "!" and for some reason these tracks get studered. Everything else plays through fine.
Anyone have any ideas? I'm thinking maybe if I get a firwire card and use an external drive for audio this might help, but I don't know for sure. I have a very old computer with windows 98, but I can't upgrade ($), and actually it does fine except for this. (It didn't do this with N-track, but N-track in general was unstable, hence the switch).
Thanks a lot.
Anyone have any ideas? I'm thinking maybe if I get a firwire card and use an external drive for audio this might help, but I don't know for sure. I have a very old computer with windows 98, but I can't upgrade ($), and actually it does fine except for this. (It didn't do this with N-track, but N-track in general was unstable, hence the switch).
Thanks a lot.
-
- KVRAF
- 1884 posts since 9 Feb, 2004 from Rochester, MN
If you're running Windows 98, there's a possibility that you don't have DMA enabled on your hard drive. That could cause stuttering when using many audio tracks. I don't remember where exactly the setting is in 98, so you might want to try searching for "windows 98 DMA" or something like that.
Otherwise, you may simply have your latency set too low, even if it's just using 25% CPU. On my computer, I can run at 2ms with just one or two VSTi's, but when I start adding stuff, I need at least 5ms for artifact-free audio.
Otherwise, you may simply have your latency set too low, even if it's just using 25% CPU. On my computer, I can run at 2ms with just one or two VSTi's, but when I start adding stuff, I need at least 5ms for artifact-free audio.
-
- KVRAF
- 6740 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
I'm guessing that means your HD can't keep up.. are you running everything off one drive?
It might be worth investing in a fast drive, as you can always drop it into any future machines you buy..
Meanwhile it might be worth trying a defrag..
It might be worth investing in a fast drive, as you can always drop it into any future machines you buy..
Meanwhile it might be worth trying a defrag..
-
- KVRAF
- 6740 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
-
- KVRAF
- 3745 posts since 29 Sep, 2002 from Killafornia
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 358 posts since 3 Dec, 2004
Thanks, I'll look into an internal one, but since I currently have no money, and would like to get more tracks up and running quickly I think I'm gonna snag a firewire pci card for cheap and use the external drive I have already for now. Plus I can always use the firewire for othr things in the future. (I have been using usb 1.0 and it's slow as hell).
Plus I have no idea how to install a harddrive.
Plus I have no idea how to install a harddrive.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 358 posts since 3 Dec, 2004
Also, I believe I did do this when I optimized my PC for audio about a year ago from a book I had. But thanks for the info.Warmonger wrote:If you're running Windows 98, there's a possibility that you don't have DMA enabled on your hard drive. That could cause stuttering when using many audio tracks. I don't remember where exactly the setting is in 98, so you might want to try searching for "windows 98 DMA" or something like that.
Otherwise, you may simply have your latency set too low, even if it's just using 25% CPU. On my computer, I can run at 2ms with just one or two VSTi's, but when I start adding stuff, I need at least 5ms for artifact-free audio.
-
- KVRAF
- 6740 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
Its really easy: just plug it in, screw it in place, boot up & format.Kang wrote:Plus I have no idea how to install a harddrive.
-
- KVRer
- 3 posts since 10 Jan, 2005 from Sydney, Australia
I have Win 98 on desktop pc and enquired about an extra internal harddrive and was told my motherboard would not support more than 30gb of disc so this was not an option. Worth checking if your motherboard will support more disc before buying an internal disc.
-
- KVRAF
- 1884 posts since 9 Feb, 2004 from Rochester, MN
The 32GB limitation is a combination of two factors: FAT32 and FDISK. If you don't use FAT32, then there's no problem (although that's not really an option with Win98). Likewise, if you don't use FDISK to partition, there should also be no problem with creating a FAT32 32GB partition.
So, FAT32 with a 3rd party partitioning/formatting program should work just fine. Other limitations may still apply though (137 GB limit for LBA24 addressing comes to mind).
So, FAT32 with a 3rd party partitioning/formatting program should work just fine. Other limitations may still apply though (137 GB limit for LBA24 addressing comes to mind).
-
- KVRAF
- 6937 posts since 4 Jun, 2004 from Utrecht, Holland
Ehm, why not take the George Martin approach? Mix down what you have to a temp track and mute the original tracks? Convert the 20 tracks to one stereo track.Kang wrote:... since I currently have no money, and would like to get more tracks up and running quickly I think ...
It is a bit of work, and far from optimal. But you can get more tracks! If you organise it a bit (group the drum tracks in one mixdown, backing instruments in another mixdown, vocals/leads/melodies in a mixdown) you can drastically reduce the number of audio tracks your host has to play, and still hear what the end result should sound like.
-
- KVRAF
- 6937 posts since 4 Jun, 2004 from Utrecht, Holland
No that won't help I'm afraid. Freezing helps CPU issues but in this case it is the harddisk that can't keep up. Audio tracks are already kinda frozen... Grouping in temp mixdowns ("group" freezing, not individual tracks) is the answer imho.Warmonger wrote:Or you could just use freeze...

