Ok new Poll test one is44k one is 96k which one is best
-
- KVRian
- 1243 posts since 24 Oct, 2003 from Maine
I voted #1. I almost always prefer an alias free sound, but this is a strange case. I'm not sure what synth you were using, but it had dull high frequency response IMO. Probably to compensate for the aliasing at 44.1; if it were naturally brighter, the aliasing would stick out like a sore thumb.
-
Spaceman Sounds Spaceman Sounds https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=56830
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 580 posts since 3 Feb, 2005
Mr M the 96khz 1 is allready in the file...read the first post. Neither can be origional as its an export from the Korg vsti.
One was done at 44 one was done at 96 then resampled at 44.
No gain change, compression or anything else was done.
It's not really of which sound you would use over the other...maybe I should have put.."which sound has the most detail".
One was done at 44 one was done at 96 then resampled at 44.
No gain change, compression or anything else was done.
It's not really of which sound you would use over the other...maybe I should have put.."which sound has the most detail".
-
- KVRAF
- 2548 posts since 7 Jul, 2003 from Huntington, WV
What I was hoping to hear, is the original 96 kHz version, before it was resampled to 44.1 kHz. I have yet to hear that.Spaceman Sounds wrote:Mr M the 96khz 1 is allready in the file...read the first post. Neither can be origional as its an export from the Korg vsti.
One was done at 44 one was done at 96 then resampled at 44.
take care,
McLilith
-
- KVRAF
- 3139 posts since 6 Sep, 2002 from United Kingdom & Opinions Will Travel :O)
Slightly different approach not as loud 
http://dspevo.com/Test1a.wav
a 96 original would be cool to see.
Best regards,
Spe3d
:O)
http://dspevo.com/Test1a.wav
a 96 original would be cool to see.
Best regards,
Spe3d
:O)
-
- KVRAF
- 2548 posts since 7 Jul, 2003 from Huntington, WV
If you want to know which has the most "accurate" detail, I still vote for the second half of the demo.
This reminds me a bit of what used to be said about old high-end Tandberg cassette decks. They supposedly had slightly less high frequencies on playback, but the highs were supposed to be more accurate and detailed than most other tape decks. Supposedly, the extra high frequency content in many other brands, came at least partially from distortion of the original high frequency content.
take care,
McLilith
This reminds me a bit of what used to be said about old high-end Tandberg cassette decks. They supposedly had slightly less high frequencies on playback, but the highs were supposed to be more accurate and detailed than most other tape decks. Supposedly, the extra high frequency content in many other brands, came at least partially from distortion of the original high frequency content.
take care,
McLilith
-
- KVRian
- 1440 posts since 16 Jul, 2003 from Zwollywood, The Netherlands (Europe)
I wonder what your setup was; did you use a VSTi with different sample rates, or are all factors in the source the same?
Think black box; you didn't by any chance create the sound in the same piece of software that recorded it?
Think black box; you didn't by any chance create the sound in the same piece of software that recorded it?
-- Regards MrM --
-
Spaceman Sounds Spaceman Sounds https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=56830
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 580 posts since 3 Feb, 2005
Mr M I'm running really low on space on my server..I thought I'd resample back to 44 as thats kind of what would happen in the long run of things
-
- KVRian
- 1440 posts since 16 Jul, 2003 from Zwollywood, The Netherlands (Europe)
I'm not asking to hear the original.
I'm only interested to read here what source you used, and how things were connected.
I'm only interested to read here what source you used, and how things were connected.
-- Regards MrM --
-
- KVRAF
- 2548 posts since 7 Jul, 2003 from Huntington, WV
<sorry, accidental post>
Last edited by McLilith on Sun Feb 20, 2005 5:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRian
- 1440 posts since 16 Jul, 2003 from Zwollywood, The Netherlands (Europe)
Imagine you use a 22 kHz source, record that once @ 44,1 and once @ 96 ; which would sound better, or would they sound the same?
-- Regards MrM --
-
- KVRAF
- 3139 posts since 6 Sep, 2002 from United Kingdom & Opinions Will Travel :O)
Allow me to introduce you to the auditorium, its free to upload files – and you can direct people to your post to download, and they don’t need to register or anything to download your files – here http://audioshots.com/auditorium/viewforum.php?f=16Spaceman Sounds wrote:Mr M I'm running really low on space on my server..I thought I'd resample back to 44 as thats kind of what would happen in the long run of things
Best regards,
Spe3d
:O)
-
Spaceman Sounds Spaceman Sounds https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=56830
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 580 posts since 3 Feb, 2005
ahh cool thats easy 
Nuendo 2 with Korg Legacy cell with preset 004 Air Swell Pad. And just exported the midi file at 96khz.
Then just used Voxengo R8Brain to resample back to 44.1khz.
Nuendo 2 with Korg Legacy cell with preset 004 Air Swell Pad. And just exported the midi file at 96khz.
Then just used Voxengo R8Brain to resample back to 44.1khz.
-
Spaceman Sounds Spaceman Sounds https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=56830
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 580 posts since 3 Feb, 2005
Not sure on recoding wavs all I know is that fx and vsti's sound a lot (better inmy view) different when exported/played back at higher sample rates. The Nord Plays back at 96khz as does the Alesis Ion I think, all the best mastering plugins from Uad-1 do it.
-
- KVRian
- 1243 posts since 24 Oct, 2003 from Maine
Actually, if I had to choose between 1 and 2 for use in a track, i'd simply pick 2 and boost the highs a bit, assuming i wanted it to take a "lead" position. Otherwise I'd go with 1.