SIR + Sonar 4
-
oddbods finger oddbods finger https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=55496
- KVRian
- 779 posts since 21 Jan, 2005 from The Vale of Eden
Does anyone else have problems using SIR with Sonar?
I find that Sonar won't run when I insert SIR on a track or bus.
I'm not sure whether this has got worse since I moved to version 4.0.2 of Sonar.
SIR did cause quirky problems before too, but now Sonar just won't even run at all.
I'd love to fix this because SIR is a great reverb that I want to use!
I find that Sonar won't run when I insert SIR on a track or bus.
I'm not sure whether this has got worse since I moved to version 4.0.2 of Sonar.
SIR did cause quirky problems before too, but now Sonar just won't even run at all.
I'd love to fix this because SIR is a great reverb that I want to use!
-
- KVRist
- 126 posts since 16 Jun, 2004
I have had the problem that Sonar doesn't remember what IR file was in use when saving projects.
-
- KVRian
- 954 posts since 15 Dec, 2000 from NY,NY,USA
The problem isn't really Sonar,but SIR's problems running at low latencey's with PDC.You'll either have to raise your latencey a bit and use SIR during mixing or rescan the plug and disable PDC.Your best bet would be to spend the cash and get Voxengo's Pristene Space which runs fine at low latecey's.
"Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal." - Albert Einstein
-
oddbods finger oddbods finger https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=55496
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 779 posts since 21 Jan, 2005 from The Vale of Eden
ah..I wondered if it was perhaps something to do with this...thanksAlan wrote:The problem isn't really Sonar,but SIR's problems running at low latencey's with PDC.You'll either have to raise your latencey a bit and use SIR during mixing or rescan the plug and disable PDC.
Yes, I've looked at that....I'm considering Elephant & an EQ so I if I bundle in Pristine Space maybe I can work a discountAlan wrote:Your best bet would be to spend the cash and get Voxengo's Pristene Space which runs fine at low latecey's.
-
- KVRian
- 951 posts since 11 Jan, 2004 from Netherlands
Did you try 'Convo Boy'?
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=74797
I just updated it and it is fully compatible with SONAR.
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=74797
I just updated it and it is fully compatible with SONAR.
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRist
- 350 posts since 7 Sep, 2004 from UK
That's interesting. Is it on a complex project with at least 24 tracks with other VSTIs ? Just asking..ttoz wrote:... in cubase at 3ms i have no problem with multiple sirs.
I've had problem with SIR in Sonar as well, dissapearing meters being the obvious one. However I am able to run SIR on tracks and busses. A project seems to work more reliably when SIR is used as a buss SEND effect.
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRist
- 350 posts since 7 Sep, 2004 from UK
This week I'm doing a project that has 54 stereo tracks, running with all sorts of plug'ins , including some mastering-grade ones ( ie:heavy cpu load+latency, not mentioning the quality
)some VSTIs, and yeh, Sonar becomes sluggish, but my goodness it's carring a heavy load.
This project has one instance of SIR on the FX buss.
Lovely.
This project has one instance of SIR on the FX buss.
Lovely.
-
- KVRian
- 954 posts since 15 Dec, 2000 from NY,NY,USA
I have no idea where your getting those facts or numbers but I'm shaking my head here.My brother has Samplitude and can't run it at low latencey's(in his comparison test with Samps built in convo),I have an older version of Nuendo and the same thing,plus that's the the same others are reporting on Cubase.net and Nuendo's forums,in fact the coder of the plugin claims around 11ms at best and is working on a new version.I can't vouch for the other hosts but I can't see how the audio engine has anything to do with this whatsoever.I can run multiple versions of Pristine space(and any other plug in fact) in Sonar as low as 1.5ms without that much of a CPU hit,so where I'm sitting Sonar has absolutely nothing to do with this .So far your the only person Iv'e ever heard of using SIR at low latencey's with PDC,sans some kid making silly boastful claims or the host not even supporting PDC in the AUX bus.Also,between my brother and I we've both used Steinberg/Magix and Cakewalk products and can't seem to see what your on about concerning Sonar's inefficient audio engine.Unless we can prove to ourselves(we can't thus far) we'll just have to respectfully disagree.The fact is this,I can't run SIR under 3ms properly without problems in any host Iv'e tried and I'd be dishonest If I claimed otherwise unless I upgraded to Athlon 64,possibly.Don't forget as we all know,different IR's cause different CPU reactions(spikes)so there's some apples and oranges here.ttoz wrote: that's why cubase, acid pro, tracktion, nuendo, samplitude, logic 5 pc, amongst others, can all run it fine at low latency. in cubase at 3ms i have no problem with multiple sirs.
the problem IS sonar, yes it has to do with pdc and latency, but sonar's audio engine is not efficient enough to handle high amounts of pdc at low latency. it's a fact.
"Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal." - Albert Einstein
