Yes. I own and like J-8, but it's cleaner than the Jupiter-8 I used.Morphoice wrote: Mon Jun 22, 2026 5:40 pm is a raw, characterful "warts and all" Jupiter something you'd want
That said, Jupiter-6 gets my vote.
Yes. I own and like J-8, but it's cleaner than the Jupiter-8 I used.Morphoice wrote: Mon Jun 22, 2026 5:40 pm is a raw, characterful "warts and all" Jupiter something you'd want
Just to set the record straight for anyone reading: the plugin was never named with the number at all, it's the word "EightyEight," spelled out, following directly from my JUNO-6 plugin "EightySix." Beyond that, the number itself isn't illegal or banned in Germany regardless. What's banned is the use of actual Nazi symbols and slogans in a genuinely extremist context, which a synth plugin obviously isn't. So there was never an issue here.TechHaus wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2026 5:03 pm I apologize for bringing it up, it was just an honest shocked reaction to seeing it on the synth at launch. I saw that it was brought to the dev's attention, and being that the dev is from where they are from, and it is ILLEGAL to represent that viewpoint there, a namechange was in order. It wasn't. It is what it is.
I expressed my viewpoint that this is maybe not great.
Moving on.
Right!audiojunkie wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2026 5:32 pm Can we now get back to the actual plugin? I’m looking forward to it (in native Linux format, of course!).
![]()
Let me make this once again absolutely clear, since it keeps getting blurred. A number is just a number, I've no issue with 88 as a quantity any more than 14 or 42; numbers are neutral. What I reject is people abusing it as shorthand for something vile, and others then tarring anything named 88 with the same brush. But that's beside the point entirely, because my plugin isn't named a number at all, it's named the stylized word "EightyEight," following straight from "EightySix." So there are three different things here that keep getting mashed into one: a neutral number, a misuse I want nothing to do with, and my plugin's name, which connects only to the first. That's the whole picture, and that's me done on it before it starts getting annoying.concealed identity wrote: Mon Jun 29, 2026 2:17 pmNo need to apologize, you did a nice thing by pointing it out even though you likely knew people here were going to be wieners about it.TechHaus wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2026 5:03 pm I apologize for bringing it up, it was just an honest shocked reaction to seeing it on the synth at launch. I saw that it was brought to the dev's attention, and being that the dev is from where they are from, and it is ILLEGAL to represent that viewpoint there, a namechange was in order. It wasn't. It is what it is.
I expressed my viewpoint that this is maybe not great.
Moving on.
The developer's fine with it sharing that number, but at least now they know and were able to make an educated choice. If it were me, I would definitely want to know.
There's really only one thing here: a number. It really, REALLY doesn't matter if it's written "88" or "EightyEight". The number is indeed misused, and as I said, it's better that you know that and are fine sharing the number than not knowing and not being fine with it.Morphoice wrote: Mon Jun 29, 2026 2:55 pmLet me make this once again absolutely clear, since it keeps getting blurred. A number is just a number, I've no issue with 88 as a quantity any more than 14 or 42; numbers are neutral. What I reject is people abusing it as shorthand for something vile. But that's beside the point entirely, because my plugin isn't named a number at all, it's named the stylized word "EightyEight," following straight from "EightySix." So there are three different things here that keep getting mashed into one: a neutral number, a misuse I want nothing to do with, and my plugin's name, which connects only to the first. That's the whole picture, and that's me done on it before it starts getting annoying.concealed identity wrote: Mon Jun 29, 2026 2:17 pmNo need to apologize, you did a nice thing by pointing it out even though you likely knew people here were going to be wieners about it.TechHaus wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2026 5:03 pm I apologize for bringing it up, it was just an honest shocked reaction to seeing it on the synth at launch. I saw that it was brought to the dev's attention, and being that the dev is from where they are from, and it is ILLEGAL to represent that viewpoint there, a namechange was in order. It wasn't. It is what it is.
I expressed my viewpoint that this is maybe not great.
Moving on.
The developer's fine with it sharing that number, but at least now they know and were able to make an educated choice. If it were me, I would definitely want to know.
Exactly! The sound is what matters.Morphoice wrote: Mon Jun 29, 2026 3:11 pmHa, "86 the 88" made me laugh. Appreciate this a lot! That's exactly the spirit I was hoping to get back to: judging the plugins on what they sound like. Thanks for watching the work and for the encouragement, it genuinely helps. More to come, and I hope the sound earns its keep with you.BBFG# wrote: Mon Jun 29, 2026 3:07 pm Funny that some are demanding you 86 the 88...
And I get the feeling it's from the 420 mob not realizing that number was once mostly a racist term too!
I have no problem with what you call them here and am watching the evolution of the plugins on their own merits. Keep going and know there are more of us than them.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026