My thinking exactly. Cart before the horse?jtxx000 wrote:hmmm.... just noticed this
now why would they include loops without better looping capabilities and a better timestretch?FULL SUITE OF "NAME-BRAND" PLUG-INS, INSTRUMENTS
AND LOOPS
Hello T2
-
- KVRist
- 112 posts since 14 Jun, 2004 from Richland, WA
http://www.EricHermanMusic.com
- Cool Tunes for Kids -
- Cool Tunes for Kids -
-
- KVRAF
- 12977 posts since 29 Sep, 2003 from Ottawa, Canada
I found the demo of the original Dicer to be a bit.. less than stable. It didn't crash, but it didn't behave in a predictable way.valley wrote:How stable ae they? Some of Jon's plugs have given me headaches in teh past (I know much of his stuff is pretty much permanently beta) and that's partly why I never quite got round to checking these plugs out.
Microdicer worked fine for the amount of time I used it. I couldn't give you an honest and accurate assessment, though, because all I did is load it up, slice up a loop, play it back with MIDI, re-arrange the MIDI, play it in real-time with MIDI...
And put it away.
I mostly wanted to try it because I'm a curious sort of guy. It did what it should do, and it didn't crash.
As for Dicer, I've not used it extensively, either. I know what it's -capable- of from the descriptions and trying the original demo back in the day; however, I've not purchased it and therefore haven't used it for much. I anticipate that Dicer 2 will address a lot of issues since it will use Microdicer's new and improved engine.
In other words: sorry, don't know for sure how stable it is.
...
Regarding the Loops thing-- I'm pretty sure the loops referred to are just loops that play back in SampleTank. Sampletank itself offers matching to host tempo (Well, the ST2LE version, I'm not familiar with this particular version so you never know), but that doesn't mean that T will feature the kind of looping tools on the timeline that you're hoping for.
Greg
-
- KVRAF
- 3364 posts since 16 Feb, 2004 from atop a katamari
if you ever worry about concreteFX stability just email jon.. it's remarkable how fast that guy works. i had two updates to vocal in as many days when i reported two bugs. squashed!
he just needs to know!
[sorry to keep this OT!]
he just needs to know!
Kick, punch, it's all in the mind.
-
- KVRAF
- 5851 posts since 9 Jul, 2002 from Helsinki
me happy.
RMIV and Slayer are a "nice touch", and the screenshot shows possibly the best looking audio software ever
I guess we get e-mailed about update pricing & details.
RMIV and Slayer are a "nice touch", and the screenshot shows possibly the best looking audio software ever
I guess we get e-mailed about update pricing & details.
-
- KVRist
- 206 posts since 13 Mar, 2002 from Zagreb, Croatia
I also hope for improved timestretch and beatslice. For all you guys who prefer to use drumloops instead of drum midi programming I suggest to switch from timestrech to beatslice. It sounds better, tempo can be altered in real time (timestrech in real time is some serious CPU hog) and it is more convinient to use. Therefore, I still have a hope that Jules will incorporate some kind of beat slicing into T2. Lets pray.
- KVRAF
- 25031 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
norockstar_not wrote: Isn't that what we all were trying to avoid and what attracted us to T in the first place, the low price and the crisp and clean minimal install and GUI?
- KVRAF
- 9096 posts since 5 Feb, 2004
It could be midi loops, or something to be used from inside ST.Shazbot wrote:My thinking exactly. Cart before the horse?jtxx000 wrote:hmmm.... just noticed this
now why would they include loops without better looping capabilities and a better timestretch?FULL SUITE OF "NAME-BRAND" PLUG-INS, INSTRUMENTS
AND LOOPS
If you have requests for Korg VST features or changes, they are listening at https://support.korguser.net/hc/en-us/requests/new
- KVRAF
- 25031 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
Microdicer is based on Dicer2 which isn't out yetvalley wrote:It does? That's cool. I just looked at dicer and found microdicer's Ui to be much easier on the eyes, but for 10 extra dollars it'd be silly not to.Lunch Money wrote:I tested out Microdicer and it was really quite easy to use. In the end, I didn't get it because it was basic functionality I had in other programs; however, Dicer offered new functionality and ICLUDES Microdicer for when you don't need the full deal.
How stable ae they? Some of Jon's plugs have given me headaches in teh past (I know much of his stuff is pretty much permanently beta) and that's partly why I never quite got round to checking these plugs out.
(or you could say it the other way around: Dicer2 will be based on Microdicer but will have Dicer's advanced functionality)

