UVI Workstation (release)
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
I have Mach Five 3, because I love the added synth and programming functionalities, but I'd like to add my voice to those that think the cripled v 2.0 of UVI Workstation is a complete nonsense. Why fix what isn't broken? Why step back? It really doesn't make sense. If you want to add scripts, then do it, but keep what was already there for the people that really want and are already used to to it.
Fernando (FMR)
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 626 posts since 29 Jul, 2003 from Paris - France
I am the one who advocated for simplifying UVI Workstation 2 toward loading and playing UVI instruments because it's vocation is to be a player for our own soundbanks.
Please let me try to explain the design decisions and flame me if you think I deserve it.
We heard the critics on forums about UVI Workstation v1, being too flashy, hard on the eyes...etc and we tried to make it more neutral to give focus on content (i.e. soundbanks) and more specifically the new scripted instruments that have dedicated interfaces. Those new instruments required us to reorganize the user interface: we introduced the Single page and took the opportunity to streamline the workflow and simplify daily usage.
In the aim of simplifying the usage for our customers, we choose to hide Hard Disk browsing in our internal FileBrowser so that all the vertical space is dedicated to soundbanks and search, users with lots of soundbanks appreciate. Note that loading of external loops and audio files is still possible by Drag & Drop, it's still there but less emphasized. But It looks like hard disk browsing is important for our customers, so it will be back in the next version.
About the Edit panel:
Our engine is modular and a fixed panel cannot match the diversity of structures and controls that are available in our instruments.
This is the reason why we introduced macro controls and scripted instruments in the first place.
But we heard the comments about the lack of editing and are actively working to provide a default editing panel.
I hope this is clarify things, don't hesitate to ask questions if not.
Please let me try to explain the design decisions and flame me if you think I deserve it.
We heard the critics on forums about UVI Workstation v1, being too flashy, hard on the eyes...etc and we tried to make it more neutral to give focus on content (i.e. soundbanks) and more specifically the new scripted instruments that have dedicated interfaces. Those new instruments required us to reorganize the user interface: we introduced the Single page and took the opportunity to streamline the workflow and simplify daily usage.
In the aim of simplifying the usage for our customers, we choose to hide Hard Disk browsing in our internal FileBrowser so that all the vertical space is dedicated to soundbanks and search, users with lots of soundbanks appreciate. Note that loading of external loops and audio files is still possible by Drag & Drop, it's still there but less emphasized. But It looks like hard disk browsing is important for our customers, so it will be back in the next version.
About the Edit panel:
Our engine is modular and a fixed panel cannot match the diversity of structures and controls that are available in our instruments.
This is the reason why we introduced macro controls and scripted instruments in the first place.
But we heard the comments about the lack of editing and are actively working to provide a default editing panel.
I hope this is clarify things, don't hesitate to ask questions if not.
Last edited by mdsp on Fri Jan 13, 2012 4:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
It no longer gives the VSL instruments that came with version 2, but it has some strings, brass, woodwinds and orchestral percussion. It's not a replacement for an East/West library, but it can get the job done.ttoz wrote:i just thoroughly checked out the motu mach 3 pages as i had decided I would go for the crossgrade price if it included strings, so i could have a decent alternative to east west. But believe it or not, there is no orchestral library included *at all*.
What a bummer.
These instruments are in the Universal Loops & Instruments.ufs collection
Fernando (FMR)
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRAF
- 2487 posts since 28 Mar, 2005
@ttoz There is some orchestral stuff in Plugsound Pro which you own AFAIK
-
- KVRer
- 4 posts since 20 Mar, 2011 from uk southwest
any news on when this update may be released? i keep checking everyday.. in desperate need of some adsr controls here
oh and that folder search option. drag and drop is so tedious!!!!!
nuttin but a chicken wing
-
- KVRAF
- 2487 posts since 28 Mar, 2005
We just got back from the NAMM show so give us a little more timemlb4sheaz wrote:any news on when this update may be released? i keep checking everyday.. in desperate need of some adsr controls hereoh and that folder search option. drag and drop is so tedious!!!!!
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
- KVRian
- 1142 posts since 31 Dec, 2006 from the hills above beautiful Boise, Idaho
Am I allowed to transfer my PLUGSOUND PRO and Synths Anthology license? I just rarely ever use them. If so, $100 for both.
"It is better to compose than decompose."
www.SeanDockery.com https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6k45d ... J5eCnhNbfA
www.SeanDockery.com https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6k45d ... J5eCnhNbfA
-
- KVRAF
- 2487 posts since 28 Mar, 2005
I only handle the software aspect so I'm not sure, please check withquantum7 wrote:Am I allowed to transfer my PLUGSOUND PRO and Synths Anthology license? I just rarely ever use them. If so, $100 for both.
support@uvi.net
Thanks,
-
- KVRist
- 167 posts since 30 Oct, 2009
Does the update allow assigning of aftertouch like the old one had?
Music you can believe in:
http://rebshaya.com
http://rebshaya.com
