Shouldn't be too hard. There sure seem to be a lot of them now.AD80 wrote:Haywoolyloach wrote: You snivel like a Democrat.
. Why dont you go move to a red state where you belong.
im going to buy Tracktion - but has the shoddy audio edting
-
- KVRist
- 125 posts since 31 May, 2004
-
- KVRAF
- 1974 posts since 21 Jun, 2002 from Earth
consider it symbolic of all the blood that is being shed...Sage wrote:Shouldn't be too hard. There sure seem to be a lot of them now.
whoops, went into political mode... sorry
ModuLR / Radio
-
- KVRAF
- 1617 posts since 2 Dec, 2003
ModuLR wrote:consider it symbolic of all the blood that is being shed...Sage wrote:Shouldn't be too hard. There sure seem to be a lot of them now.
whoops, went into political mode...
... take it to www.itsallpolitics.com 
-
- KVRAF
- 3745 posts since 29 Sep, 2002 from Killafornia
There sure are. All the best ones too: Wyoming, Alabama, South Dakota, Kentuky, Utah...Sage wrote:Shouldn't be too hard. There sure seem to be a lot of them now.AD80 wrote:Haywoolyloach wrote: You snivel like a Democrat.
-
- KVRist
- 105 posts since 19 Oct, 2003
So why don't you download the demo and see for yourself?Montana wrote:been improved?
Hopefully Tracktion now uses cool edit/audition style editing instead of the cumbersome, time wasting "clip" system?
Stop trolling.
You seem to come here every so often and proclaim loudly to the world that you will almost buy Tracktion, but that really it sucks for this reason or that reason. Why does the clip system waste your time? Either introduce a constructive argument or let it go. Spend your money on T or not. Use it or not once you've bought it. Who cares?
Martin
"Life is both a major and a minor key"
-- Travis, Side
-- Travis, Side
-
- KVRAF
- 25031 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
Don't be harsh to Montana 
- he would have thirty others who bought Tracktion right away if the crappy audio-editing wouldn't suck that hardly
- he would have thirty others who bought Tracktion right away if the crappy audio-editing wouldn't suck that hardly -
- KVRer
- 2 posts since 9 Nov, 2004 from Calgary
I, too, am a trolling almost-buyer. My OS isn't upgraded enough (yet) to run tracktion, so I can't try the demo.
Can anyone tell me if the editing capabilities of Tracktion would allow me to zoom into the waveform and move the file forwards or back if it was out of phase with a duplicate file. Say, for instance, if I ran a guitar track out and through an outboard compressor, and then back in, I would need to drag the file back to bring it back in phase with the original track. Can it be done?
Thanks for your help!
Can anyone tell me if the editing capabilities of Tracktion would allow me to zoom into the waveform and move the file forwards or back if it was out of phase with a duplicate file. Say, for instance, if I ran a guitar track out and through an outboard compressor, and then back in, I would need to drag the file back to bring it back in phase with the original track. Can it be done?
Thanks for your help!
-
- KVRAF
- 12977 posts since 29 Sep, 2003 from Ottawa, Canada
You can zoom in right to sample level, and nudge or drag at sample resolution. So, yes, you can do that! If you overlap one waveform over top of another, it becomes transparent, too.
HOWEVER,
As of right now, due to a GUI design 'flaw' (at least I think of it as a flaw), the waveform is resized vertically for the selected clip, so the waveforms won't match up perfectly.
Back to the other hand-->
You will generally HEAR phase problems, and then you can just use nudge to get them back into phase.
Greg
HOWEVER,
As of right now, due to a GUI design 'flaw' (at least I think of it as a flaw), the waveform is resized vertically for the selected clip, so the waveforms won't match up perfectly.
Back to the other hand-->
You will generally HEAR phase problems, and then you can just use nudge to get them back into phase.
Greg
-
- KVRist
- 235 posts since 16 Apr, 2003 from Norway
Another vote for better editing.
Tracktion excels at sequencing audio, and it would be even better if you could do bread and butter editing of audio files inside T.
Tracktion excels at sequencing audio, and it would be even better if you could do bread and butter editing of audio files inside T.
-
- KVRAF
- 25031 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
such as?Breakpete wrote:Another vote for better editing.
Tracktion excels at sequencing audio, and it would be even better if you could do bread and butter editing of audio files inside T.
-
- KVRAF
- 5782 posts since 10 Mar, 2003 from Music Shed #8
amplitude peak detection & markingjens wrote:such as?Breakpete wrote:Another vote for better editing.
Tracktion excels at sequencing audio, and it would be even better if you could do bread and butter editing of audio files inside T.
reverse
decent timestretch/pitchshift!
-
- KVRAF
- 25031 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
clueless wrote:'amplitude peak detection & markingjens wrote:such as?Breakpete wrote:Another vote for better editing.
Tracktion excels at sequencing audio, and it would be even better if you could do bread and butter editing of audio files inside T.
reverse
decent timestretch/pitchshift!
agreed about the time-stretch/pitch shift but I('m not sure if I'd call it 'bread and butter'-editing?
I'm clueless about what 'amplitude peak detection & marking' is.
- Do you think I need it? Reverse is already possible within Tracktion - rtfm
-
- KVRist
- 317 posts since 13 Oct, 2001 from Mars
I bet he's referring to a beat slicer.jens wrote: agreed about the time-stretch/pitch shift but I('m not sure if I'd call it 'bread and butter'-editing?
I'm clueless about what 'amplitude peak detection & marking' is.