We've just implemented "parameter locking". From next revsion on you can simply lock the reverb's Dry/Wet settings and go from thereEchoes in the Attic wrote:Ah yes, but I still think it would be great to be able to only bypass reverb, just because the other insert effects in Zebra are often so useful to the patch.
cheers
Improvements!
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30185 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
- KVRAF
- 5234 posts since 25 Feb, 2008
Yeah, that was a bit mean of me - should have written simple architecture, which is closer to what I meant.Urs wrote:The sound engine is far from basic in terms of DSP.hakey wrote:a pretty basic sound engine?
- KVRAF
- 5234 posts since 25 Feb, 2008
Cynical or no, there must be reasons why Sylenth became popular amongst that crowd. My guess, the factory patches were the biggest single factor.3*s wrote:Also I think assuming superficialities and simplification are a requirement of a synth that is good for edm is a bit cynical.
-
Echoes in the Attic Echoes in the Attic https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=180417
- KVRAF
- 12004 posts since 12 May, 2008
Awesome! Sounds like an excellent feature.Urs wrote:We've just implemented "parameter locking". From next revsion on you can simply lock the reverb's Dry/Wet settings and go from thereEchoes in the Attic wrote:Ah yes, but I still think it would be great to be able to only bypass reverb, just because the other insert effects in Zebra are often so useful to the patch.
cheers
- KVRAF
- 26937 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
I think one of the things that has gone unmentioned over the years but that has actually been beneficial in its popularity is that Sylenth is very well controlled with volume. I only have the demo... never purchased it... but playing around with the demo it is hard to get it to go too loud and distort. Move all sorts of controls and the volume mainly stays in an acceptable range. I think this has contributed significantly to the sense people have that it is easy to program.Urs wrote:Most of all, the parameter ranges are cleverly thought out. It's a concept that has an admirably "complete" approach.
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30185 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Hmm, not sure. I think the supersaw volumes are well chosen and the filter resonance is normalised (or just not gain compensated for negative feedback).hakey wrote:There's some limiting going on, no?pdxindy wrote:Sylenth is very well controlled with volume [...] it is hard to get it to go too loud and distort
Next time I find the time I'll check it out under that aspect.
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30185 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Well... the cutoff frequency in a 24dB filter is the point where the signal is attenuated 12dB, so a quarter as loud as the unfiltered signal. It would have to open to about 40kHz in order to not attenuate 10+kHz audibly. This is when no resonance is applied.Bronto Scorpio wrote:Another small, but very important thing about the possible "EDM" synth: The filters should open completely! Most of Zebras filters cut away a significant amount of high frequencies even at the highest setting. The Xcite filter is currently the best choice to keep those high freqs. For many EDM sounds the top octaves are very important imo.
Cheers
Dennis
When resonance is applied the attenuation at the cutoff frequency turns from less into none and into a boost with more and more feedback.
Now, if a filter would fully open, there's an easy chance that resonance will create aliasing, because frequencies beyond the limits of usual samplerates get pronounced - easily to the point that downsampling filters can't suppress well enough. Hence many developers including us refrain from that idea.
An easy way to open a filter fully from the user's side is to apply a little resonance, just below the point of a frequency boost. That should work for any filter that goes up to about 20kHz. Or, a developer could "fake" fully open by adding a little resonance automatically.
- KVRAF
- 5234 posts since 25 Feb, 2008
Massive arguably has a claim to being the definitive EDM plugin. A different paradigm, but some of the modern EDM tropes - all that orrible crunchy Skrillex stuff, for example - would be difficult or impossible with a Sylenth-like synth.
- KVRAF
- 1617 posts since 11 Dec, 2008 from Minneapolis
Turns out someone just nailed the next killer app for EDM.
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30185 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Hmmm, when I listen to that stuff I don't hear many synths. It's more like people trying to use drum samples to immitate the sound of a vintage 56k modem negotiating a connectionhakey wrote:Massive arguably has a claim to being the definitive EDM plugin. A different paradigm, but some of the modern EDM tropes - all that orrible crunchy Skrillex stuff, for example - would be difficult or impossible with a Sylenth-like synth.
- KVRAF
- 4845 posts since 2 Sep, 2005 from city of lights (nl)
You might just as well use printer sounds
Rekkerd.org the latest news on audio plugins, sample libraries & virtual instruments, synth presets & more.
Don't click here if you can't control yourself!
Don't click here if you can't control yourself!
-
- KVRian
- 777 posts since 13 Dec, 2011
Iirc he said (in an interview, somewhere) that most of his sounds that people think were made with Massive, were actually made with FM8 or (Live's) Operator.hakey wrote:Massive arguably has a claim to being the definitive EDM plugin. A different paradigm, but some of the modern EDM tropes - all that orrible crunchy Skrillex stuff, for example - would be difficult or impossible with a Sylenth-like synth.
Guess he hasn't discovered Bazille yet.
