I know that. But the "just slap a preset on it and your close to a number #1 in billboard charts" is not my approach. I want to understand what's going on at least a tiny bit and get to know what "the fuzz is all about". If I just slap it on a track and use it as if I would use the compressor device I can even use compressor first place and save some cpu cycles.lodsb wrote: ↑Tue Apr 30, 2024 12:18 pmIdk. You can use comp+ just like the normal comp. All the the additional knobs are optional, as far as I see it. If you want to dig deeper, you can.] Peter:H [ wrote: ↑Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:30 am I have watched the video on compressor+ on bitwig.com again. I still don't have a clue ... from "it's only multi-band analysis" over "per band upwards and downwards compression" up to "unified compression" this is all really disturbing pieces of "information" in one video ... I understand the urgent need for distinction of a niche company ... but I'm utterly puzzled whether all this goes in the right direction... only my personal opinion.
I really don't want to go PhD Thesis style individual re-engineering analysis to understand a commodity feature like compression... I have to honestly admit: this compressor+ is too much for me. Either I upgrade to Peter+ or better stick to bread & butter compressors which I understand.
And my point actually was - the "information" in the "compressor+ explained" video left me puzzled. After the video I was more or less as clueless as before ... could be the video, or my lack of comprehension.
I have to admit that I haven't looked into the manual though, in order to check out whether I can get the "details" of the inner working rather than relly on guess work.
Anyway - No need to dicuss my lack of comprehension anymore. I think when reverb+ arrives in 5.3 I will buy me an upgrade to my brain to become Peter++ and then it will be no problem any longer