Ands I'm hoping they don't follow this advice (well the first part of it). New instruments and devices are very welcomebabaji wrote: Tue Aug 19, 2025 4:57 am
I'm still rooting for them, but I really hope the devs take a step back from building new synths for a cycle and focus on these massive workflow gaps.
Does Bitwig seem like a daw that very few people want? Kind of a rant I guess.
- KVRAF
- 37375 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
-
- KVRian
- 918 posts since 7 Sep, 2014
I was working in Ableton. And seems that Bitwig in the same area... but at this moment I am working with video. And this option is not possible in all DAWs. So I was choose Cubase (between Cubase and Logic)
-
- KVRAF
- 5144 posts since 3 Oct, 2013
yupp Cubase is a better option because of .dawprojectAlexander_D wrote: Tue Aug 26, 2025 5:47 am I was working in Ableton. And seems that Bitwig in the same area... but at this moment I am working with video. And this option is not possible in all DAWs. So I was choose Cubase (between Cubase and Logic)
- https://www.musicradar.com/news/10-years-bitwigDom: “Beyond the Bitwig Studio updates, there are other major milestones for the company. We’ve been pushing forward with quite a few other projects like DAWproject – a collaboration between us and PreSonus to build a universal project container.”
Claes: “The DAWproject idea is that you can transfer full projects between DAWs. Alongside that, there’s CLAP [u-he and Bitwig’s new open standard for plugins]
We believe that our industry is too small to have closed ecosystems because really, it’s all about working together
Placidus: “Overall, this just shows that we have a different approach as a company. We know some companies in our industry are very much under the loom of the Apple approach – creating closed ecosystems. We believe that our industry is too small to have closed ecosystems because really, it’s all about working together. Over time we’ve connected with other like-minded companies in the industry.
IMO both AL, and Apple, on the other hand, just go with the strategy of ‘I’m big enough now that I don’t have to care about anyone ... At the very least, let the music be good for its own sake—not just because there’s money to be made from it(it's one of the biggest gift of the humanity)
"Where we're workarounding, we don't NEED features." - powermat
-
- KVRist
- 220 posts since 25 Sep, 2022
I think all is said, herekurt008 wrote: Sun Aug 10, 2025 2:56 pm ...
Bitwigs very unsustainable software maintenance. Their policy obviously prefers to gain new customers all the time, but at the price of disappointing and discouraging existing users non-stop. As a person who develops my musical experience over time I expect a software, which 'develops' similarly, making workarounds more and more unnecessary. But instead more and more workarounds are needed to not be disappointed more and more - and this is even connected with an expectation of gaining more and more money - a calculation, I'm personally not satisfied with and I explicitly dislike. I cannot work in this short-sighted manner myself either, if I don't want to get kicks in my butt and ... in the end loose money
...
like no other software I know Bitwig is reacting to very little feedback
...
and weaknesses are even neglected completely
- KVRAF
- 26927 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
Now that V6 beta is available, this statement is shown to be wrong.kurt008 wrote: Sun Aug 10, 2025 2:56 pm Because... like no other software I know Bitwig is reacting to very little feedback.....
-
- KVRAF
- 5144 posts since 3 Oct, 2013
Now that FL Studio has gone down the ‘best DAW for beginners’ route — AI as your buddy, following in Magix Music Maker’s footsteps — and suddenly everyone’s on board, I need a T-shirt that says: ‘I was using Bitwig before it was cool.’ 
"Where we're workarounding, we don't NEED features." - powermat
-
- KVRist
- 220 posts since 25 Sep, 2022
If I look at the release note, I see a lot of "new features", no improvements. That's exactly what it was said before "Their policy obviously prefers to gain new customers all the time, but at the price of disappointing and discouraging existing users non-stop".
Another example of the inconsistency between major updates that bring new features that will stay as is.
Another example of the inconsistency between major updates that bring new features that will stay as is.
-
- KVRian
- 1357 posts since 7 Oct, 2023 from Tokyo
You mean aside from all the improvements to automation, UI quality of life, bug fixes and so on?monolithx wrote: Mon Sep 08, 2025 9:10 am If I look at the release note, I see a lot of "new features", no improvements.
-
- KVRian
- 814 posts since 15 Jun, 2018
Bitwig releases an update so focused on user feedback that the vast majority of the community sings high praises, which has not been the case for a long long while, but a few users seem so bent on finding fault. It's not hard to understand DAW makers not enganging with social media commenters of forum posters much any more.
-
- KVRist
- 220 posts since 25 Sep, 2022
Ok... I don't speak about a particular update, here. It's not a single update that will change my long term observations. It lacks of consitency in the evolution. This is with what I agree in the post I have quoted.
That said, for my personal use, I don't care about mouse editing features (there are enough DAWs for that). Live performance features are stuck since long. And this is where the market lacks of serious alternatives.
I just can't believe missing multichannel and VST3 multi midi support after 15 years! The engine is stuck almost since the beginning! Maybe because it doesn't produce fancy screenshots for the marketing departement...
And if we are talking about UI, just take a look at VE Pro to see what customization mean (in fact, I don't even mix in Bitwig mixer)! DAW customizations, in general, are at their minimum compared to others.
Fortunately, with all actual AI tools, I'm able to build my own control tools using the API.
-
- KVRAF
- 5145 posts since 13 Jul, 2004 from Earth
This update is everything i asked for and more so i am very happy with this updatejules99 wrote: Mon Sep 08, 2025 10:30 am Bitwig releases an update so focused on user feedback that the vast majority of the community sings high praises, which has not been the case for a long long while, but a few users seem so bent on finding fault. It's not hard to understand DAW makers not enganging with social media commenters of forum posters much any more.
It is true that there has been some less interesting updates in the past but that hasn't bothered me that much since my license runs out in January 2028 and i have been happy with Bitwig so far so i never did have much interest in what the updates was giving me until this awesome update came out.
I also had a feeling that the prices might go up because of the stupid Economy Crisis so i sold the highest version of Bitwig and bought the producer version that had the features i used the most in it and the renewal licenses in 2023 when the price was still low.
-
- KVRist
- 386 posts since 21 Jun, 2019
If you have a very small set of requirements (live and mixing), then you should find a DAW specialised in that. You can blame Bitwig for not catering to your requirements, but that's not how product development works. It's on you, the user, to pick the right DAW. If Bitwig, Ableton Live, etc. don't have the features you need, then you should just move on and find the piece of software that does check your boxes.monolithx wrote: Mon Sep 08, 2025 11:34 am That said, for my personal use, I don't care about mouse editing features (there are enough DAWs for that). Live performance features are stuck since long. And this is where the market lacks of serious alternatives.
-
- KVRist
- 220 posts since 25 Sep, 2022
You are right except that I was misled by their Live and Grid modular style... not to say about their target customers blur...
As I said, using AI for DAW scripting is a game changer for me, I just hope that there will not be just another stagnant feature. So using a DAW is not a one time choice...
As I said, using AI for DAW scripting is a game changer for me, I just hope that there will not be just another stagnant feature. So using a DAW is not a one time choice...
-
- KVRist
- 386 posts since 21 Jun, 2019
If you want scripting, why don't you use Reaper? It's the most customizable DAW out there, and also great for mixing what I heard. Not sure about the live part, though.monolithx wrote: Mon Sep 08, 2025 1:31 pm As I said, using AI for DAW scripting is a game changer for me