Zebra 2.3.3 beta
- KVRAF
- 26974 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
Looking forward to trying the new XMFHoward wrote:The forthcoming XMF sounds FANTASTIC! Especially "analogue" mode.Urs wrote:"XMF" is the same as in the current XMF, "analogue" is the same as in Bazille
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30215 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Hey, but don't expect too much... even though "having a 48dB filter" sounds like a great thing, its usefulness is rather questionable.
For reasons I'm not quite sure about it sounds massively different from the old XMF. Like in the Bazille filter, self oscillation produces a pretty clean sine with less harmonics than e.g. a Moog filter. The Overload of the old XMF did that trick, but I havn't yet got a clue how to reproduce it in the corresponding setting of the new XMF.
For reasons I'm not quite sure about it sounds massively different from the old XMF. Like in the Bazille filter, self oscillation produces a pretty clean sine with less harmonics than e.g. a Moog filter. The Overload of the old XMF did that trick, but I havn't yet got a clue how to reproduce it in the corresponding setting of the new XMF.
-
- KVRian
- 795 posts since 2 Apr, 2006
so you mean it's currently not possible to make the new xmf sound like the old one?
I love the growl, overload and moogy sound of the xmf. Please don't remove that!!
I love the growl, overload and moogy sound of the xmf. Please don't remove that!!
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30215 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Well, I think I just sussed that out...Kyran wrote:so you mean it's currently not possible to make the new xmf sound like the old one?
I love the growl, overload and moogy sound of the xmf. Please don't remove that!!
Five distortion modes:
- XMF pretty close to old XMF, but 24dB less loud on full Overload
- analogue almost same as Bazille
- digital 8-Bit lofi
- eco close to analogue, but using a cheaper waveshaper (saves 30% cpu on each XMF)
- folded rather ill type of distortion
-
- KVRAF
- 2911 posts since 3 Mar, 2006
Holy crap urs, you're like a soft synth super hero!
-
- KVRist
- 244 posts since 16 Feb, 2003 from Switzerland
Yes, the gain staging needed taming.Urs wrote: XMF pretty close to old XMF, but 24dB less loud on full Overload
Cool. Haven't heard Bazille filters yet, but it's reputation is beginning to precede it.Urs wrote:analogue almost same as Bazille
Bah...Urs wrote:digital 8-Bit lofi
8 bit business is currently handled in the shaper mod.
I was hoping for an extreme saturation algo like the "digital" distortion mode in the Viri.
Also 8 bit is not that useful in my experience. Often when fellow producers talk about applying bit crushers, they are referring to Sample Reduction, which currently isn't covered in Zebra.
Still Urs, I don't want to appear ungrateful, or to diminish your extraordinary efforts in improving the already massively superb Zebra even further. The dual filter serial/parallel routing + filter offset alone is a major feature improvement in my books.
UsefulUrs wrote:eco close to analogue, but using a cheaper waveshaper (saves 30% cpu on each XMF)
Hmmm. Will it useable?Urs wrote:folded rather ill type of distortion
cheers,
bagginz
-
Echoes in the Attic Echoes in the Attic https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=180417
- KVRAF
- 12045 posts since 12 May, 2008
That all sounds like some great XMF improvements! I'm not sure I'd ever load up the regular VCF!
On a side note, what came of that poll where you asked about Zebra's biggest weaknesses? It seemed that the waveshapers got the most votes. Are you tinkering with those at all for the update? Just curious really...
On a side note, what came of that poll where you asked about Zebra's biggest weaknesses? It seemed that the waveshapers got the most votes. Are you tinkering with those at all for the update? Just curious really...
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30215 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Well, the XMF got slightly more expensive... and the normal filters get their overhaul too. LP Allround has just seen some major improvementsEchoes in the Attic wrote:That all sounds like some great XMF improvements! I'm not sure I'd ever load up the regular VCF!
Yes and no.On a side note, what came of that poll where you asked about Zebra's biggest weaknesses? It seemed that the waveshapers got the most votes. Are you tinkering with those at all for the update? Just curious really...
I have a full new distortion module laying around which was coded by no-one less than George "Gasm" Bezerianos (remember TriDirt?). I initially wanted to merge that into the Shaper modules, but all controls are too different. So I have to add a new type of module for it. And I have to go through the algorithms and apply my latest trickery for speed. Thus, hmm, I'm not quite sure if everybody and myself is patient enough for this to come in 2.5. It may have to wait for 2.6
P.S:: Bagginz, I agree that the bit-crusher isn't all that great. Havn't sussed out the digital mode of the Virus yet though... I think the problem here is that I'm not just driving the filter input, but quite a few "transistors" within the whole filter circuit. I guess for the Viral Digitalness one needs to do a single flip-flop in one place and all the normal stuff in the other places.
-
- KVRist
- 243 posts since 16 Nov, 2007 from Spain
-
- KVRist
- 244 posts since 16 Feb, 2003 from Switzerland
Urs,Urs wrote: P.S:: Havn't sussed out the digital mode of the Virus yet though...
not that I think that the Virus' digital distortion mode is the holy grail of distortion, ( but it does the job o.k.) Just that the Virus "Digital" mode is the capable of the most saturation and I know that you have a Virus to use as a reference point.
Currently Zebra doesn't quite have this.
Closest I can get is by using a Shaper module set to Shaper mode and turning up Depth and Edge to max. And by using LowPass Allround with it's fiery resonance to make it scream a bit...
Putting another shaper module in series doesn't give the desired result either. Nor does various combinations of XMF filter distortion and shapers in series.
I'd send you a Zebra patch which is pretty close just so you can get an idea of what I am babbling about - if I knew how to attach it to this post. Got an address I can send it?
Well, if you say so, I'll take your word for itUrs wrote: I think the problem here is that I'm not just driving the filter input, but quite a few "transistors" within the whole filter circuit. I guess for the Viral Digitalness one needs to do a single flip-flop in one place and all the normal stuff in the other places.
I'm a musician not a programmer, I know nothing about how this stuff works...
Cheers,
bagginz
- KVRAF
- 26974 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
Looking forward to trying that... 2.5 or 2.6.Urs wrote: I have a full new distortion module laying around which was coded by no-one less than George "Gasm" Bezerianos (remember TriDirt?). I initially wanted to merge that into the Shaper modules, but all controls are too different. So I have to add a new type of module for it. And I have to go through the algorithms and apply my latest trickery for speed. Thus, hmm, I'm not quite sure if everybody and myself is patient enough for this to come in 2.5. It may have to wait for 2.6
Urs
One other thing for the future... Would it be possible to have a switch in Zebra so that when selected it rendered the same as if I put the audio interface to 96khz? It is a pain to run at 96khz resource-wise, but some of my Zebra presets need 96. Overall, I would rather run at 48khz and be able to selectively set Zebra to 96 as desired. I don't know if that is easy or hard to do for you and I can get by with my current workflow of bouncing Zebra at 96 but its a clumsy way.
Thanks for all your work. After 2.6 I guess I would not care if you did any further updates to Zebra. Recently I used some other synths mostly working with audio and last night I used Zebra for the first time in a couple weeks and it sounds amazing.
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30215 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
urs@u-he.combagginz wrote:I'd send you a Zebra patch which is pretty close just so you can get an idea of what I am babbling about - if I knew how to attach it to this post. Got an address I can send it?
Yesterday I managed to tame the resonance of LP Allround. At the same time it adds the pleasant capability of quite some nice distortion - it's quite a law that the amount of distortion is responsible for the resonance being behaved or not. Same accounts for HP12, RezBand and LP12 which are based on the same topology.
Today I'm going to look into the "difficult filters", which are LP Xcite, MidDrive, OldDrive, QBand, HP24 and the notch one. These are based on a topology that took me ages to distort at all. Their problem is that they sound instable on fast filter sweeps, and the yresonance becomes exceptionally loud and uncontrolled in the bass department.
It's the same topology that was used in FilterscapeVA's first lowpasses later on (FSVA filters were coded years after Zebra's original ones). There I'm using a spiffy trick to compensate for massive volume jumps (which is probably why the Hip Hop and Soul scene and loves that thing). Maybe I can somehow port that back into Zebra...
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30215 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Can you send me a bunch so that I can see which modules you mean? I'm currently oversampling some modules and algorithms anyway, so maybe it's right there already?pdxindy wrote:some of my Zebra presets need 96
-
- KVRian
- 875 posts since 26 May, 2009 from Area 51
what are the chances of a preset search/filter function? 
would be so useful for something like finding a 303 sound: type in 303 and all presets with 303 in the name come up
would be so useful for something like finding a 303 sound: type in 303 and all presets with 303 in the name come up
