GRM Tools: Atelier coming soon -

[mqtthiqs]

this is the weirdest product rollout I've ever seen. Atelier has been out for more than a month and they still haven't fixed or addressed the issue

I don't know what to say. The web team (different dept. in a 1000+ppl public institution) has been "working on it". It's a "technical issue". I'm out of options to push them to resolve this. Sorry.

In the next few days we will push our first update to Atelier itself (v1.0.1), with a good dozen of bugfixes and minor improvements. We're well underway on the Windows port.

[ChamomileShark]

That must be incredibly frustrating. Looking forward to the Windows version.

[Caine123]

is there a release date for the windows version?

[mqtthiqs]

is there a release date for the windows version?

Our best (conservative) guess is still sometime in Q1 2026, the real answer being as usual "when it's ready". A few days ago we've successfully run Atelier on Win11 with no major roadblock; now we're ironing out the (many) details and packing it up, which might take a while.

[nanostream]

I don't know what to say. The web team (different dept. in a 1000+ppl public institution) has been "working on it". It's a "technical issue". I'm out of options to push them to resolve this. Sorry.

This sounds terrible, but stay strong! There are new customers waiting at the end of the tunnel, or something.

[b russolo]

new update...
But still no tempo synchronization. Are you going to implement it?
It would be great to implement synchronization with swing options...

[Caine123]

is there a release date for the windows version?

Our best (conservative) guess is still sometime in Q1 2026, the real answer being as usual "when it's ready". A few days ago we've successfully run Atelier on Win11 with no major roadblock; now we're ironing out the (many) details and packing it up, which might take a while.

thx

[the_eraser]

new update...
But still no tempo synchronization.

Cmon man. It's only 1-2 persons developing it, Windows version is still to come, and this is a 1.0.1 update mostly to fix bugs...

The update is very welcome. Thanks Matthias and everyone involved!

[Sampleconstruct]

Why is the amount of the agitation signal not stored within a given snapshot? Is that a deliberate omission or a bug?

[kraster]

Why is the amount of the agitation signal not stored within a given snapshot? Is that a deliberate omission or a bug?

I presume you're talking about the depth control on the destination parameter?

Is the same for other modulators?

To me that sounds like something that should be stored with a snapshot.

[Sampleconstruct]

Why is the amount of the agitation signal not stored within a given snapshot? Is that a deliberate omission or a bug?

I presume you're talking about the depth control on the destination parameter?

Is the same for other modulators?

To me that sounds like something that should be stored with a snapshot.

Actually I meant the amount slider in the modulators themselves but mod depth also isn't stored within a snapshot, only with the preset. It should at least be an option.

[kraster]

Why is the amount of the agitation signal not stored within a given snapshot? Is that a deliberate omission or a bug?

I presume you're talking about the depth control on the destination parameter?

Is the same for other modulators?

To me that sounds like something that should be stored with a snapshot.

Actually I meant the amount slider in the modulators themselves but mod depth also isn't stored within a snapshot, only with the preset. It should at least be an option.

I can see why the slider amount itself would not be kept with snapshots since it's outside the module and you may want to have the same amount on a different module.

But individual parameter destination depth seems like something that should be part of the snapshot.

(I assume we're talking about the 1,2,3,4 etc. snapshot buttons)

[b russolo]

new update...
But still no tempo synchronization.

Cmon man. It's only 1-2 persons developing it, Windows version is still to come, and this is a 1.0.1 update mostly to fix bugs...

The update is very welcome. Thanks Matthias and everyone involved!

Sorry, I didn't know the team was so small!
I didn't mean to cause any stress here, but I wanted to ask if it was going to be implemented, because maybe it might not fit with the plugin's philosophy.

[Sampleconstruct]

Why is the amount of the agitation signal not stored within a given snapshot? Is that a deliberate omission or a bug?

I presume you're talking about the depth control on the destination parameter?

Is the same for other modulators?

To me that sounds like something that should be stored with a snapshot.

Actually I meant the amount slider in the modulators themselves but mod depth also isn't stored within a snapshot, only with the preset. It should at least be an option.

I can see why the slider amount itself would not be kept with snapshots since it's outside the module and you may want to have the same amount on a different module.

But individual parameter destination depth seems like something that should be part of the snapshot.

(I assume we're talking about the 1,2,3,4 etc. snapshot buttons)

I just double checked and neither modulation amount nor amplitude of modulation source are stored within a snapshot but only as global parameters within a preset, so my feature request is to add these parameters to the snapshot system.

[Funky40]

my feature request is to: *
- add something like a box with 8 buttons. ( or at least 4)
- Each button can be mapped to any parameter. Any main paremeter at least.
- "activating a button will remove said parameter from beeingh affected by the snapshot system


"Atelier" feels overall very "un-outdeveloped" to me. A very fresh child.
Things which have been implemented do feel good for me. Nicely donne vs. soundquality and other things.
But a very early stage.



- and please add the superslider vs. the snapshot system.
- without, are the old GRM Tools more powerful for my usages.


* :
- please add "this" to the GRM Tools as well !