Diva 1.1 Final (beta testing finished)
- KVRAF
- 2686 posts since 5 Feb, 2004 from Nevada City, California
- KVRAF
- 1617 posts since 11 Dec, 2008 from Minneapolis
CTRL-click I think is conventional for adding an individual element to the selection set, there are some other CTRL-modifierKey-click that differ from Mac behavior, but someone else would have to checkHoward wrote: Shift+click selects a region, cmd+click selects single presets. How is it on PC, please? Thanks!
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30180 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
That's on my long term wishlist. Timers on the dsp side (as opposed to gui) always seemed messy to me, but there's no rational reason not to do them...mbncp wrote: Would just be nice to change preset when I'm not near the pc. What about some flag and a timer, it doesn't need to switch right away and to respond after each cc value change
- Banned
- 6129 posts since 9 Oct, 2007 from an inharmonious society
After a lot of testing this Diva update out, I've not encountered any problems, and even with the coreduo2, I still notice it's using a lot less cpu.
So great work there, and thanks.
Just wish a couple of the sound designers from the 3rd party banks presets, would have had a few sounds make it into the main presets page, that didn't for whatever reason.
So great work there, and thanks.
Just wish a couple of the sound designers from the 3rd party banks presets, would have had a few sounds make it into the main presets page, that didn't for whatever reason.
-
- KVRist
- 350 posts since 10 Oct, 2011
Are there plans to adjust the fine tune to 1:1cent ?
Because it's still 0,5:1cent as of now.
It's not really a problem, just wouldn't like to be surprised with a future change.
Because it's still 0,5:1cent as of now.
It's not really a problem, just wouldn't like to be surprised with a future change.
-
- Banned
- 947 posts since 10 Apr, 2007
You can arrange them freely though.mcnoone wrote:
Just wish a couple of the sound designers from the 3rd party banks presets, would have had a few sounds make it into the main presets page, that didn't for whatever reason.
-
- KVRer
- 1 posts since 9 Apr, 2012
Very good news, indeed.
What about the support for Pro Tools?
What about the support for Pro Tools?
- KVRAF
- 4072 posts since 28 Jan, 2011 from MEXICO
Wow, now its hard to crush my CPU almost with any patch with one instance in a i5 760 . And sounds so good.
dedication to flying
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30180 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
We're looking into AAX soon. If that's a no-go due to certain requirements then we'll do RTAS Mac. Also, we've got the FXpansion wrapper now, so we'll try to add some workarounds proposed by them which should make their wrapper compatible with our VST implementation.Paul Dither wrote:Very good news, indeed.
What about the support for Pro Tools?
(As always though, things take longer than expected... this update was believed to be out 4 weeks ago)
-
- KVRian
- 867 posts since 26 Jul, 2009
you can safely add AMD's newer processors to the supported cpus for multithreading.
my 3 year old PhenomII 955BE almost doubles the poly voices when multihreading is enabled.
interesting the new transient mode feature (analog/dc reset /vcf reset), may be useful in shaping basses and percussive sounds even further...so can't wait to play around with that.
thanks for the update
my 3 year old PhenomII 955BE almost doubles the poly voices when multihreading is enabled.
interesting the new transient mode feature (analog/dc reset /vcf reset), may be useful in shaping basses and percussive sounds even further...so can't wait to play around with that.
thanks for the update
-
- KVRist
- 197 posts since 12 Mar, 2010 from Italy
Will those improvements affect ACE in a not so long term?
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30180 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Yep. We should do a little research here. Our only AMD-processor is a single core from 2004...olikana wrote:you can safely add AMD's newer processors to the supported cpus for multithreading.
my 3 year old PhenomII 955BE almost doubles the poly voices when multihreading is enabled.
Well, people have come to expect rather "uniform" transients from their digital synths. Thus we got a lot of request to do oscillator phase reset etc., which we can't properly do for various reasons (we won't rule the option out for future releases though)interesting the new transient mode feature (analog/dc reset /vcf reset), may be useful in shaping basses and percussive sounds even further...so can't wait to play around with that.
thanks for the update
But the main problem is this: Digital synths usually put voices to sleep while they're silent. This saves a lot of cpu and in cases such as Diva is even vital (you won't want 16 voices to run all the time...). So if a new note hits the synth, a voice gets woken up out of stand by and often faces a completely different set of conditions than it had before putting it to sleep. This may cause a voice to behave erratically for a few milliseconds until it "locks" to its new life span.
So now we're "massaging" a voice to prepare it for its new life once we resurrect it.
However, people pointed out that transients are still whacky e.g. when you play high notes and then low notes and vice versa. Thus, if a voice wakes up like, say, 3 or 5 octaves apart from where it left, it would still "click" differently on short attacks than if it played only a small interval. This is also true though for the analogue synths we draw inspiration from.
Thus we think we got the behavior right, but we see the point that for certain types of sound this isn't desirable. Hence the option to just zap a few capacitors (DC-killers) or the lowpass filter.
Zapping capacitors gives you a uniform click at the beginning of notes. Zapping filters makes it even more uniform, but also requires any self oscillation to build up from scratch. Zapping filters for drum sounds based on filter resonance is thus not a good idea.
Cheers,
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30180 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Multicore, MIDI, yes.alphadelphi wrote:Will those improvements affect ACE in a not so long term?
The new feedback prediction algorithm may affect ACE if we ever manage to add a new filter module option to it.
There's a whole lot of things that may or may not be viable for integration with ACE. We'll have to evaluate those things step by step, but our main focus will be Zebra for a few months after this update.
-
Bronto Scorpio Bronto Scorpio https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=98170
- KVRAF
- 5546 posts since 13 Feb, 2006 from Wiesmoor, Germany
Urs wrote:our main focus will be Zebra for a few months after this update.
- KVRAF
- 12522 posts since 21 Mar, 2008 from Hannover, Germany
Cool. Just found and downloaded the new Beta. Will check it ASAP.
Ingo
Ingo
Ingo Weidner
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
