Is DIVA the end of the road?

Official support for: u-he.com
RELATED
PRODUCTS
Diva$209.00Buy

Post

Urs wrote:Our current favourites are the Polivoks filter, a Steiner-Parker filter and a diode ladder (TB, System 100)
Steiner-Parker à la Synthacon ? Please ? :hyper:

Damn, now I want them three. Diva beggs for some more unpredictable/wilder components : Bite feels lonely ;)

TB's enveloppes could be great too !
Computer musician / Ableton Certified Trainer / Mastering engineer
.com
3OP

Post

Polivoks filter in Diva would be a MUCH better choice than TB-303!

Post

I'd still really love a little Pro One magic. It's the only vintage synth I GAS for at all.

Post

GruvSyco wrote:I'd still really love a little Pro One magic. It's the only vintage synth I GAS for at all.
Yep, our recently refurbished one is a really cool sounding machine.

Post

Urs wrote: Our current favourites are the Polivoks filter, a Steiner-Parker filter and a diode ladder (TB, System 100)
One thing I remember people saying about the Minibrute is that the resonance is extremely unstable and chaotic at high levels. Think there'd be a way to employ digital trickery to control the resonance of a Steiner-Parker, via a knob or slider? Or do you think that chaotic resonance is part of the charm?

Post

Chaotic resonance is a part of S-P filter's charm.

Post

Hmmm, they are not much different from MS-20 filters. Structurally there's two or three more resistors, which allow for multiple inputs (BP/LP/HP) at once. Not sure how they're realised in the Minibrute, but the original ones have some sort of symmetric approach that makes them look more complicated than they are.

Our intern (who's currently all over the Polivoks) might wnat to have a look at those.

Post

I suppose it just goes back to my interest in the idea that digital emulation of analogue circuit behaviour could allow things that are difficult or impossible in the real world.

I'm extremely intrigued by the idea that there might be synth designs that were never realised, because the circuits were too large or complex; component values had to be ridiculously exact; or the design would only work at a specific temperature. But I'm not really educated enough on the subject to be anything more than enthusiastic about it.

Post

Something like an analog Comb filter could be interesting:
http://www.analoguesystems.co.uk/modules/rs120.htm

So far i only used digital Comb filters like that in the Waldorf Synths (e.g. Blofeld, Largo).

An interesting filter could also be an analog formant filter based on e.g. multiple resonant BP filters:
http://www.doepfer.de/a104.htm

I had done a comparable approach in MuTools MUX with a bunch of BPFs at fixed frequencies which were close to certain "vowel" frequencies:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formant

There also was the Moog 914 filter bank (1 LPF, 12 fixed BPFs, 1 HPF) for the Moog Modular:
http://www.moogarchives.com/m914.htm
Audio Damage made this emulation:
http://www.audiodamage.com/effects/prod ... ?pid=AD010

There also seemed to be a smaller 907 module (with 8 fixed BPFs), this is a DIY version:
http://www.jhaible.com/ffb/fixed_filter_bank.html


Ingo
Ingo Weidner
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1

Post

Urs wrote:Not sure… any noise we'd add would be kind of fake.

It's one of those things that we found not-so-desirable to model.

There used to be noise sources in the vintage age that were more prominent: Tape noise, cables, cheap consoles. It makes more sense IMHO to add those than to add noise into the synth itself.

We did consider scratchy knobs as a means of copy protection though :hihi:
I've been experimenting a bit with Satin of late. It is soooo good. It satisfies my craving for noise. It works great in combination with Diva. There is also a subtle warming type effect that I get from it. Great job!

Post

knowix wrote:
Urs wrote: Our current favourites are the Polivoks filter, a Steiner-Parker filter and a diode ladder (TB, System 100)
One thing I remember people saying about the Minibrute is that the resonance is extremely unstable and chaotic at high levels. Think there'd be a way to employ digital trickery to control the resonance of a Steiner-Parker, via a knob or slider? Or do you think that chaotic resonance is part of the charm?
From my experience with the Minibrute, the SP-filter's resonance almost sounds like it's being modulated by noise when you set it to high levels. This is intereting because with smaller resonance, you don't get that sound, but instead a slurpy, shallow resonance that reminds me of the SID chip's filter.

You can sort of emulate this in Diva by using the Bite filter and adding noise modulation to the cutoff and/or the resonance to taste.
http://sendy.bandcamp.com/releases < My new album at Bandcamp! Now pay what you like!

Post

I purposely avoid dedicated hardware-software combos. I have done so ever since NI abandoned Kore. I have Maschine, too, which I bought into before Kore was abandoned and was all rah-rah about the combo, but I just totally soured on it when Kore was dropped, especially when links to my Kore sounds were made to go away from NI's we've site (to be fair support sent me links right away when I complained and now I can see them in the NI service center so they fixed the issue). I have not yet upgraded to Maschine 2 and don't know if I will ever do so.

There are plenty of advances to be had in software synths. The human-computer interface is one of them.
------------------------------------------
Gribs

Post Reply

Return to “u-he”