2CAudio Breeze | 2.5 | Simple. Light. Pristine. Intelligently Adaptive.
- KVRist
- 495 posts since 18 Aug, 2006 from Italy
Hi, I'm presently running the demo.
El Capitan 10.11.6 here, with Logic Pro X 10.3.2 on an iMac Retina 5K end of 2015 (3.3 GHz Intel Core i5 quad-core).
I can confirm that the demo is running with no problems at all, except a bug that has already been reported here in this topic: I cannot type keywords in the search text field (the fields are blocked and remain empty and the keystrokes are intercepted by Logic).
I can also confirm that the CPU use values are sensibly lower with respect to Breeze 1, which I own.
I observe some occasional CPU spikes only in the exact moment when I am switching from one preset to another, especially if audio is running.
It seems to me that, even using the "Old 1.0 Factory" presets, they sound more detailed in Breeze 2.0, do you agree?
My first impression is that this is a very useful, beautiful reverb!
El Capitan 10.11.6 here, with Logic Pro X 10.3.2 on an iMac Retina 5K end of 2015 (3.3 GHz Intel Core i5 quad-core).
I can confirm that the demo is running with no problems at all, except a bug that has already been reported here in this topic: I cannot type keywords in the search text field (the fields are blocked and remain empty and the keystrokes are intercepted by Logic).
I can also confirm that the CPU use values are sensibly lower with respect to Breeze 1, which I own.
I observe some occasional CPU spikes only in the exact moment when I am switching from one preset to another, especially if audio is running.
It seems to me that, even using the "Old 1.0 Factory" presets, they sound more detailed in Breeze 2.0, do you agree?
My first impression is that this is a very useful, beautiful reverb!
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2621 posts since 12 Sep, 2008
We can do SSE for 64bit hosts.
We are 64-bit only on OSX already, so this does not mean anything new on OSX -- except for the fact that YES, we can support SSE.
It would mean the only thing we don't support is 32-bit Windows hosts running on SSE (non-AVX) CPUs. I think that is a reasonable compromise? How many people using SSE-machine find they still need 32-bit hosts? 32-bit win hosts would still be available for AVX, so AVX machines are unaffected.
We can probably have this online in 8-10 hours or so.... well, maybe more even more immediately...
We are 64-bit only on OSX already, so this does not mean anything new on OSX -- except for the fact that YES, we can support SSE.
It would mean the only thing we don't support is 32-bit Windows hosts running on SSE (non-AVX) CPUs. I think that is a reasonable compromise? How many people using SSE-machine find they still need 32-bit hosts? 32-bit win hosts would still be available for AVX, so AVX machines are unaffected.
We can probably have this online in 8-10 hours or so.... well, maybe more even more immediately...
Last edited by Andrew Souter on Thu Dec 21, 2017 1:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
No horse in this race here, but... i'd assume that 32-bit would be more of a thing on computers which only support SSE, simply because it's older, and older hardware might still run 32-bit OS's. Is that a reason to pack work into supporting that also? I don't think so. If it was for me, plugin developers wouldn't have to support 32-bit at all anymore. It's deprecated, and it's also not popular. Nevermind loners on the net, who will always tell you that it is an absolute necessity to still support 32-bit. There are figures, and those figures say that the least of people are using Windows 10 32-bit, for example.Andrew Souter wrote: It would mean the only thing we don't support is 32-bit Windows hosts running on SSE (non-AVX) hosts. I think that is a reasonable compromise? How many people using SSE-machine find they still need 32-bit hosts?
-
- KVRist
- 275 posts since 7 Apr, 2015
Andrew Souter wrote:We can do SSE for 64bit hosts.
We are 64-bit only on OSX already, so this does not mean anything new on OSX -- except for the fact that YES, we can support SSE.
It would mean the only thing we don't support is 32-bit Windows hosts running on SSE (non-AVX) hosts. I think that is a reasonable compromise? How many people using SSE-machine find they still need 32-bit hosts? 32-bit win hosts would still be available for AVX, so AVX machines are unaffected.
We can probably have this online in 8-10 hours or so.... well, maybe more even more immediately...
This is a great news...
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2621 posts since 12 Sep, 2008
WIN Demo with SSE support:Andrew Souter wrote: It would mean the only thing we don't support is 32-bit Windows hosts running on SSE (non-AVX) hosts. I think that is a reasonable compromise? How many people using SSE-machine find they still need 32-bit hosts? 32-bit win hosts would still be available for AVX, so AVX machines are unaffected.
We can probably have this online in 8-10 hours or so.... well, maybe more even more immediately...
http://www.2caudio.com/sitecontent/prod ... n_Demo.zip
we'll replace the OSX demo and the full versions later today.
let us know. thanks.
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2621 posts since 12 Sep, 2008
Yes sir! Particularly so we can get your ears on it too!Den* wrote: This is a great news...
more soon. stepping out for several hours now.
- KVRAF
- 5643 posts since 15 Dec, 2011
I do.Andrew Souter wrote:How many people using SSE-machine find they still need 32-bit hosts?
-
- KVRist
- 204 posts since 14 Aug, 2008
correction: the minimum now is not SSE but SSE3, we could technically explore going down to SSE2 support, even SSE if there are requests from people but SSE3 already covers majority of cpus. and I think with some efforts it's possible to make it work on 32-bit systems but 32-bit systems are getting obsolete now.
-
- KVRian
- 1062 posts since 3 Oct, 2011 from Christchurch, New Zealand
given that sse3 dates back to the 2004 generation of intel cpus I’d hope no-one is still using a sse2 cpu!!2ca wrote:correction: the minimum now is not SSE but SSE3, we could technically explore going down to SSE2 support, even SSE if there are requests from people but SSE3 already covers majority of cpus.
-
Sampleconstruct Sampleconstruct https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=191286
- KVRAF
- 16747 posts since 12 Oct, 2008 from Here and there
- KVRAF
- 10133 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
Demo crashes when trying to open the GUI
Bitwig
Win10 Pro 64bit
intel i7 860
NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
Bitwig
Win10 Pro 64bit
intel i7 860
NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- KVRAF
- 10133 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
And the release full version causes the following message in all my hosts
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- KVRAF
- 25014 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
Your CPU is too old and doesn't support AVX, which is a requirement for this pre-release:
A CPU with AVX Instructions is required for Breeze 2.0 during the Pre-Release.
- KVRAF
- 8503 posts since 29 Sep, 2010 from Maui
Ok my first 2C audio purchase 
I am a bit concerned about the limited number of downloads. This is pretty much the reason I have never purchased
anything prior. Why don't you use google drive or something. I trust that this limit can be circumvented if the need should arise.
Great job btw...
-Cheers
I am a bit concerned about the limited number of downloads. This is pretty much the reason I have never purchased
anything prior. Why don't you use google drive or something. I trust that this limit can be circumvented if the need should arise.
Great job btw...
-Cheers

