KVR Audio

xoxos · Post by **xoxos** » Wed Sep 28, 2011 6:07 pm

somewhere around here i've got another one that says i'm just the programmer this guy is looking for..

DaveHoskins · Post by **DaveHoskins** » Wed Sep 28, 2011 6:15 pm

Good, put some samples up when you're done, I want to hear this immeasurable impossibility of 40% in audio improvement, of course your samples could be 128 Kbps MP3s, but hey!

Dave.

Where's he gone then?

AdmiralQuality · Post by **AdmiralQuality** » Wed Sep 28, 2011 6:43 pm

DaveHoskins wrote:Good, put some samples up when you're done, I want to hear this immeasurable impossibility of 40% in audio improvement, of course your samples could be 128 Kbps MP3s, but hey!

Dave.

Where's he gone then?

This is why we can't have nice things.

But yeah. 40% improvement. Apply it again and that's 96% improvement (please forgive my bad math from the previous post). Etc...

You should be able to input single bit noise and, after a few iterations of the precious patented process, have a symphony orchestra (or something "better") come out!

aciddose · Post by **aciddose** » Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:04 pm

i'd be more inclined to assume he meant 40% as in ~4.5db maximum in ideal conditions.

AdmiralQuality · Post by **AdmiralQuality** » Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:12 pm

aciddose wrote:i'd be more inclined to assume he meant 40% as in ~4.5db maximum in ideal conditions.

But dB is a relative measure of power or intensity. Not betterness. And besides, I'm pretty sure you can't patent multiplication. (I hope anyway!)

aciddose · Post by **aciddose** » Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:15 pm

well i'm talking in terms of noise reduction for example. 4.5db would really lick the mutt-balls.

there is really no quantifier for betterment.

mystran · Post by **mystran** » Wed Sep 28, 2011 8:16 pm

whyterabbyt wrote:
DaveHoskins wrote:
xoxos wrote:i'm not sure about that the $5 i spent for my archbishop accreditation with universal life church was worth every penny.
But they will ordain you for free online!
(And no, I'm not going to put a link.)

Dave.
It didnt cost me anything to become a Pope.

AdmiralQuality · Post by **AdmiralQuality** » Wed Sep 28, 2011 8:24 pm

aciddose wrote:well i'm talking in terms of noise reduction for example. 4.5db would really lick the mutt-balls.

there is really no quantifier for betterment.

Where did he mention noise reduction? And how does it know what part of my MP3 is noise? (I assume if it processes audio files on playback from an iPhone it's meant for music. Or will it make podcasts 40% awesomer too?) If I'm listening to, like, death metal, will it attenuate it to -∞ dB? That would be betterer.

Borogove · Post by **Borogove** » Wed Sep 28, 2011 8:39 pm

aciddose wrote:well i'm talking in terms of noise reduction for example. 4.5db would really lick the mutt-balls.

there is really no quantifier for betterment.

It makes your colorless green ideas sleep 40% more furiously, duh.

aciddose · Post by **aciddose** » Wed Sep 28, 2011 10:37 pm

AdmiralQuality wrote:Where did he mention noise reduction?

it's in the context. basically everything he said was noise.

antto · Post by **antto** » Thu Sep 29, 2011 6:45 am

if i record myself farting or burping, i wonder what would this incredible technology do to the audio material? ;]

arakula · Post by **arakula** » Thu Sep 29, 2011 7:24 am

Easy. Your fart will sound 40% better, according to the vanished OP.

Full Bucket · Post by **Full Bucket** » Thu Sep 29, 2011 10:34 am

I love threads like this... makes me feel 40% better

Cheers Björn

Shabdahbriah · Post by **Shabdahbriah** » Thu Sep 29, 2011 5:53 pm

Full Bucket wrote:I love threads like this... makes me feel 40% better

Cheers Björn

It IS a marked improvement over ZenPunkHippy's 39% (better) to be sure.

[2c]

mfa · Post by **mfa** » Thu Sep 29, 2011 7:15 pm

I stumbled into this a couple of days ago: http://www.jobfox.com/Web/Seeker/Landin ... plyhired75

Could be related to what the fellow was talking about.

Audio programming - programmer needed