Muse Research Receptor

Configure and optimize you computer for Audio.
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

sickle666 wrote:
gnu23 wrote: So the big takeaway for me here is the EVM Synthpack...I hadn't heard these before, and while not all of them have MP3 demos, what I did hear was pretty good - any comments/experience on EVM?
Say what? I may be mistaking you, but did you just suggest you want a Muse because EVM's stuff is on it?

That's like a $30 to $50 SE plug pack, man..I own the EVM stuff & they're all great & all, but that's hardly a selling point for this thing, is it?


Rob, same here, it's going in the guitar rack if it's going anwhere..since we live on two different blocks it's a beautiful thing as I'd have to take you out :D
I think what he ment was that the ting he is taking away from this thread is the new knowladge of the EVM pack. Saying (I think) that he hadnt hear of it till this thread and likes it :) Not that he is going to buy the Receptor for the pack :)

Post

Robot Randolph wrote:
db wrote:
Robot Randolph wrote:
Kriminal wrote:Im guessing an empty version wont happen. They pay companies for Receptor converted versions, so they have to sell them as a package. Is that right?
I dont think so.... Ive already met a few (4) developers not happy with muse at all...
How so? We need details, man! :?
All I am saying is some people are quite unhappy with Muse... money, company etc... I dont even think Im supposed to know what I do heh.
That's 8), I can read between the lines! :lol:

Post

Robot Randolph wrote: The linux Muse host is the same thing I beleive.
So you're saying that they use the Linux software sequencer named Muse along with Wine? :?
Im really wondering how they dealt with all the licenses that potential could be broken right now. Im not very good with license stuff, but it sure as hell seems like a few are broken.
Warning! Warning! The lawyers are circling!
<cough! cough!> :scared:
Last edited by Improv on Sat Aug 14, 2004 6:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post

there was a thread here a few weeks ago where Ben flat out eliminated any connection between the Linux Muse & the Muse Reasearch companies..

But it does strike me as very, very odd that there are TWO Muse 'things' running BOTH on linnux..

Very odd..

Image

Post

db wrote:
Robot Randolph wrote: The linux Muse host is the same thing I beleive.
So you're saying that they use the Linux software sequencer named Muse along with Wine? :?
Im really wondering how they dealt with all the licenses that potential could be broken right now. Im not very good with license stuff, but it sure as hell seems like a few are broken.
<cough! cough!> :scared:
Im 99% sure the linux sequencer Muse is made by Muse Research. I could be veyr wrong though.... It would be a huge coincidence.

Post

Ben | KvR wrote:
jens wrote:
Squids wrote:
Ben | KvR wrote:
Squids wrote:Is this MusE Research (who owns KVR btw)? This is seems oddly coincidental that the Receptor also runs on Linux and opens Windows VST plug-ins. Ben? Anyone know?
It's nothing to do with Muse Research.
WOW!

What do you think of this? Or can you not really say?
if you are asking because of copyright issues:

This sequencer (and its name) is pretty old (september 2002) so if anyone owns the name it's them :wink:
And Muse Research was formed in March 2002, but that's irrelevant... I don't think Muse Research see this as a problem (AFAIK anyway).

:)

Post

sickle666 wrote:
Ben | KvR wrote:
jens wrote:
Squids wrote:
Ben | KvR wrote:
Squids wrote:Is this MusE Research (who owns KVR btw)? This is seems oddly coincidental that the Receptor also runs on Linux and opens Windows VST plug-ins. Ben? Anyone know?
It's nothing to do with Muse Research.
WOW!

What do you think of this? Or can you not really say?
if you are asking because of copyright issues:

This sequencer (and its name) is pretty old (september 2002) so if anyone owns the name it's them :wink:
And Muse Research was formed in March 2002, but that's irrelevant... I don't think Muse Research see this as a problem (AFAIK anyway).

:)
One formed right after the other, in the same year, working on the same technology, with the same name.

very fishy, but I guess we can only go by what ben says.

Post

sickle666 wrote:there was a thread here a few weeks ago where Ben flat out eliminated any connection between the Linux Muse & the Muse Reasearch companies..

But it does strike me as very, very odd that there are TWO Muse 'things' running BOTH on linnux..

Very odd..
Hmm...missed that thread. If you go to:

http://lmuse.sourceforge.net/

You can see that the Linux software mid/audio sequencer here is GPL licensed. IOW, not proprietary at all. According to the credits, the principal developers are:

Frank Neumann
Robert Jonnson
Werner Schweer!
Joachim Schiele

Do any of them have anything to do with Muse the hardwarebox company? :?

Plus the software still looks rather rough and unfinished, which it is at MusE 0.7pre4!

As you say, very odd! :?

Post

I smell poop.


Don't really care though as long as it does it's job as advertised.

Something really needs to be done to make allowances for existing licenses for the provided synths.

Did i say that right?

If I own Albino or whatever else is 'free' in this machine, but I had to pay for a VST license already, I want that taken out of the cost, unless it comes in a new bullet-proof propriatary format that makes my coffee & never crashes is what I meant to say..

Post

db wrote:
jens wrote:
Squids wrote:
Ben | KvR wrote:
Squids wrote:Is this MusE Research (who owns KVR btw)? This is seems oddly coincidental that the Receptor also runs on Linux and opens Windows VST plug-ins. Ben? Anyone know?
It's nothing to do with Muse Research.
WOW!

What do you think of this? Or can you not really say?
if you are asking because of copyright issues:

This sequencer (and its name) is pretty old (september 2002) so if anyone owns the name it's them :wink:

I believe the Greeks used the term 'Muse', what? Several centuries ago at least! :wink:
Lol, db, how the hell do you explain THAT then?! :hihi:

Post


Post

db wrote:
sickle666 wrote:there was a thread here a few weeks ago where Ben flat out eliminated any connection between the Linux Muse & the Muse Reasearch companies..

But it does strike me as very, very odd that there are TWO Muse 'things' running BOTH on linnux..

Very odd..
Hmm...missed that thread. If you go to:

http://lmuse.sourceforge.net/

You can see that the Linux software mid/audio sequencer here is GPL licensed. IOW, not proprietary at all. According to the credits, the principal developers are:

Frank Neumann
Robert Jonnson
Werner Schweer!
Joachim Schiele

Do any of them have anything to do with Muse the hardwarebox company? :?

Plus the software still looks rather rough and unfinished, which it is at MusE 0.7pre4!

As you say, very odd! :?
Principles of Muse Research:

Chris Halaby
President & CEO

Michael Ost
Software Architect

Gregory Simpson
VP of Product Design & Usability

Dan Timis
DSP Architect

Bryan Lanser
VP of Business Development

Keith Borman
VP of Sales

Ben Turl
Web Manager



Don't see a connection, but damn is this thread keeping the boredom off my back here at work :D

Post

...believe the Greeks used the term 'Muse', what? Several centuries ago at least! :wink:
Lol, db, how the hell do you explain THAT then?! :hihi:[/quote]

Explain what? Greeks, muse, or centuries?
:? :lol:

Obviously the word has been in common use for centuries, but we're talking about two specific instances currently in use for similar purpose.

There are a lot of similarities between the two. But not being a conspiracy advocate, I think it's just co-incidence.

Post

db wrote:Hmm...missed that thread.
That's what I was refering to. You say you missed it, but you posted in it :P

Post

sickle666 wrote:
...damn is this thread keeping the boredom off my back here at work :D
:lol: You too? Damn, I'm not even at work-what's my excuse? Screw the pooch time? :lol:

I know what my excuse it: the caffeine hasn't kicked in yet. Damn!

Post Reply

Return to “Computer Setup and System Configuration”