any know what happening to the "channel strip" plu
-
- KVRAF
- 12977 posts since 29 Sep, 2003 from Ottawa, Canada
-
- KVRAF
- 3617 posts since 26 Sep, 2003 from Bradford - The Armpit of Britain
- KVRAF
- 9096 posts since 5 Feb, 2004
I think the native EQ is the ruler and it has numbers damn it! Plus a convenient display! 
If you have requests for Korg VST features or changes, they are listening at https://support.korguser.net/hc/en-us/requests/new
-
- KVRAF
- 6490 posts since 14 Jun, 2004 from Rochester, NY
- KVRAF
- 9096 posts since 5 Feb, 2004
What's log view anyway, and how is it useful?rpc9943 wrote:no log view
If you have requests for Korg VST features or changes, they are listening at https://support.korguser.net/hc/en-us/requests/new
-
- KVRAF
- 6490 posts since 14 Jun, 2004 from Rochester, NY
well note how the mids and lows are the one quarter of the view. instead of spread out equally. also there isnt much space to move things accurately.
-
- KVRAF
- 4644 posts since 28 Nov, 2002 from Chicago
he means that the scale of the eq does not correspond to the octave distribution of frequencies. IE the range 220-440 Hz should ideally cover as much screen estate as the range 1760-3520Hz.
Someone shot the food. Remember: don't shoot food!
- KVRAF
- 9096 posts since 5 Feb, 2004
Any this makes it shit?valley wrote:he means that the scale of the eq does not correspond to the octave distribution of frequencies. IE the range 220-440 Hz should ideally cover as much screen estate as the range 1760-3520Hz.
*edit* I guess I have a different perspective because I remember when you would have to spend $$ to get a decent parametric EQ, and possibly only have a few for your whole project. The one included with T seems a marvel to me by comparison. Gotta love software.
Last edited by braj on Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If you have requests for Korg VST features or changes, they are listening at https://support.korguser.net/hc/en-us/requests/new
-
- KVRAF
- 6740 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
We already have a log view. What Ron really wants (and I agree it would be better) is to have a slightly different log scale which gives more priority to the lower frequencies.braj wrote:What's log view anyway, and how is it useful?rpc9943 wrote:no log view
If the view was really linear (as Ron seems to think) then the halfway point of the 20Hz-20KHz range would be approx 10KHz. This would give enormously detailed control over the upper 'air' frequencies while making it almost impossible to distinguish between say 50Hz and 80Hz. As it is the halfway point is about 4KHz, but if I had the choice I would put it closer to 1KHz. (as it is in the Final Mix EQs
Last edited by IIRs on Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:13 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- KVRAF
- 9096 posts since 5 Feb, 2004
Don't be cruelIIRs wrote: As it is the halfway point is about 4KHz, but if I had the choice I would put it closer to 1KHz. (as it is in a certain other plug that I can't tell you much about!)
If you have requests for Korg VST features or changes, they are listening at https://support.korguser.net/hc/en-us/requests/new
-
- KVRAF
- 6740 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
Damn you're too quick!braj wrote:Don't be cruelIIRs wrote: As it is the halfway point is about 4KHz, but if I had the choice I would put it closer to 1KHz. (as it is in a certain other plug that I can't tell you much about!)
-
- KVRAF
- 6490 posts since 14 Jun, 2004 from Rochester, NY
damn it. DAMN IT!
well i mean a more accurate log view is that better?
Damn it i want my plugs
RonC
well i mean a more accurate log view is that better?
Damn it i want my plugs
RonC
-
- KVRAF
- 12977 posts since 29 Sep, 2003 from Ottawa, Canada
-
- KVRer
- 7 posts since 24 Jun, 2005
braj wrote:Don't be cruelIIRs wrote: As it is the halfway point is about 4KHz, but if I had the choice I would put it closer to 1KHz. (as it is in a certain other plug that I can't tell you much about!)


