Hive preview (April 1 update)
- KVRer
- 16 posts since 17 Nov, 2014
I personally am very much in favor of a BYO page.
Those who don't want it don't use it. As far as I can judge it wouldn't cost much, probably the most time costly would be the GUI-part. There are just these "pains" that you'd like the filter from normal but prefer the detune law from clean.
For those worried about it making the synth too "complex" (which I don't understand), there'd be GUI-ways to make the BYO-part less outstanding.
[...normal...] [.....dirty....] [....clean....] [byo]
Those who don't want it don't use it. As far as I can judge it wouldn't cost much, probably the most time costly would be the GUI-part. There are just these "pains" that you'd like the filter from normal but prefer the detune law from clean.
For those worried about it making the synth too "complex" (which I don't understand), there'd be GUI-ways to make the BYO-part less outstanding.
[...normal...] [.....dirty....] [....clean....] [byo]
Last edited by supernova on Sun Dec 28, 2014 12:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRist
- 253 posts since 13 Nov, 2013 from London
That seems sensible.supernova wrote:I personally am very much in favor of a BYO page.
Those who don't want it don't use it. As far as I can judge it wouldn't cost much, probably the most time costly would be the GUI-part. There are just these "pains" that you'd like the filter from normal but the detune law from clean.
For those worried about it making the synth too "complex" (which I don't understand), there'd be GUI-ways to make the BYO-part less outstanding.
[...normal...] [....clean....] [.....dirty....] [byo]
- KVRAF
- 26963 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
But then why even have Normal/Dirty/Clean?? BYO can do all of them. Just have BYO be the synth and get rid of engines altogether.supernova wrote:I personally am very much in favor of a BYO page.
Those who don't want it don't use it. As far as I can judge it wouldn't cost much, probably the most time costly would be the GUI-part. There are just these "pains" that you'd like the filter from normal but prefer the detune law from clean.
For those worried about it making the synth too "complex" (which I don't understand), there'd be GUI-ways to make the BYO-part less outstanding.
[...normal...] [....clean....] [.....dirty....] [byo]
-
- KVRist
- 253 posts since 13 Nov, 2013 from London
slap myself in the face. You're right haha. The filters are the engines already.pdxindy wrote:But then why even have Normal/Dirty/Clean?? BYO can do all of them. Just have BYO be the synth and get rid of engines altogether.supernova wrote:I personally am very much in favor of a BYO page.
Those who don't want it don't use it. As far as I can judge it wouldn't cost much, probably the most time costly would be the GUI-part. There are just these "pains" that you'd like the filter from normal but prefer the detune law from clean.
For those worried about it making the synth too "complex" (which I don't understand), there'd be GUI-ways to make the BYO-part less outstanding.
[...normal...] [....clean....] [.....dirty....] [byo]
- Banned
- 10196 posts since 12 Mar, 2012 from the Bavarian Alps to my feet and the globe around my head
Then Hive would loose its soul. Because they engines are the specialty of Hive, at the moment.pdxindy wrote:But then why even have Normal/Dirty/Clean?? BYO can do all of them. Just have BYO be the synth and get rid of engines altogether.supernova wrote:I personally am very much in favor of a BYO page.
Those who don't want it don't use it. As far as I can judge it wouldn't cost much, probably the most time costly would be the GUI-part. There are just these "pains" that you'd like the filter from normal but prefer the detune law from clean.
For those worried about it making the synth too "complex" (which I don't understand), there'd be GUI-ways to make the BYO-part less outstanding.
[...normal...] [....clean....] [.....dirty....] [byo]
- KVRer
- 16 posts since 17 Nov, 2014
because additional drop-down menus would draw off from HIVE's approachability for people new to synths which I think HIVE aims for.pdxindy wrote:But then why even have Normal/Dirty/Clean?? BYO can do all of them. Just have BYO be the synth and get rid of engines altogether.
maybe the BYO-function could be buried even more (representing it with a gear symbol for example, like found on many smartphones for user system settings), but I think it's an important feature.
Last edited by supernova on Sun Dec 28, 2014 12:42 am, edited 2 times in total.
- Banned
- 10196 posts since 12 Mar, 2012 from the Bavarian Alps to my feet and the globe around my head
A switch to an "expert view" with more options would be better than drop-down menus. It's not Reaper, after all... 
-
Touch The Universe Touch The Universe https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=190615
- KVRAF
- 5841 posts since 2 Oct, 2008
Seems some users just want this synth to be finished asap. Why? Why be so impatient. Spend another year on it and keep improving it. I'm not talking about new features, but the fundamentals, the core of the synth. To be honest Sylenth still sounds better imo. Don't rush urs in any way and try to be honest about the synth.
100 High Quality Soundsets: Omnisphere 2, Dune 3, Tone 2 Synths, Pigments, Uhe Synths, Halion, Spire, and others.
TTU Youtube
TTU Youtube
- Banned
- 10196 posts since 12 Mar, 2012 from the Bavarian Alps to my feet and the globe around my head
That's true. I wouldn't have any problems if it would be released in April, not in January. Good wine needs to mature to become great wine.
- KVRAF
- 4805 posts since 21 Jan, 2008 from oO
what is it that makes sylenth sound better iyo?mysticvibes wrote:Seems some users just want this synth to be finished asap. Why? Why be so impatient. Spend another year on it and keep improving it. I'm not talking about new features, but the fundamentals, the core of the synth. To be honest Sylenth still sounds better imo. Don't rush urs in any way and try to be honest about the synth.
JamWide - a cross-platform Ninjam client for DAWs
-
Touch The Universe Touch The Universe https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=190615
- KVRAF
- 5841 posts since 2 Oct, 2008
Seriously, to create a vsti as good as sylenth I would wait patiently for YEARS.....Tricky-Loops wrote:That's true. I wouldn't have any problems if it would be released in April, not in January. Good wine needs to mature to become great wine.
100 High Quality Soundsets: Omnisphere 2, Dune 3, Tone 2 Synths, Pigments, Uhe Synths, Halion, Spire, and others.
TTU Youtube
TTU Youtube
- KVRAF
- 4805 posts since 21 Jan, 2008 from oO
hive is pretty much done in the core, there might be slight changes or more Osc in future but i don't think much will change, otherwise there wouldn't be a public beta. If it would change drastically, all the presets would be for nothing now.
JamWide - a cross-platform Ninjam client for DAWs
-
Touch The Universe Touch The Universe https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=190615
- KVRAF
- 5841 posts since 2 Oct, 2008
The sound, is fuller, phatter, smoother. The interplay of the filters routings where two filters are linked creating a low pass, band pass, high pass sort of filter in one. Check out the Reese bass preset that ships with the factory bank as the example that comes to mind, plenty others though. Also, the overall simplicity. I admit I've spent a lot more time with sylenth so I am biased. Will have a listen to what others have done with it so far. These are just my initial impressions.Suloo wrote:what is it that makes sylenth sound better iyo?mysticvibes wrote:Seems some users just want this synth to be finished asap. Why? Why be so impatient. Spend another year on it and keep improving it. I'm not talking about new features, but the fundamentals, the core of the synth. To be honest Sylenth still sounds better imo. Don't rush urs in any way and try to be honest about the synth.
100 High Quality Soundsets: Omnisphere 2, Dune 3, Tone 2 Synths, Pigments, Uhe Synths, Halion, Spire, and others.
TTU Youtube
TTU Youtube
- Banned
- 10196 posts since 12 Mar, 2012 from the Bavarian Alps to my feet and the globe around my head
There isn't any problem as long as they're ADDING features. If they REMOVE features (or drastically change them), the older presets wouldn't be compatible any more.Suloo wrote:hive is pretty much done in the core, there might be slight changes or more Osc in future but i don't think much will change, otherwise there wouldn't be a public beta. If it would change drastically, all the presets would be for nothing now.
- KVRAF
- 4805 posts since 21 Jan, 2008 from oO
did you try to recreate those patches already?mysticvibes wrote:The sound, is fuller, phatter, smoother. The interplay of the filters routings where two filters are linked creating a low pass, band pass, high pass sort of filter in one. Check out the Reese bass preset that ships with the factory bank as the example that comes to mind, plenty others though. Also, the overall simplicity. I admit I've spent a lot more time with sylenth so I am biased. Will have a listen to what others have done with it so far. These are just my initial impressions.Suloo wrote:what is it that makes sylenth sound better iyo?mysticvibes wrote:Seems some users just want this synth to be finished asap. Why? Why be so impatient. Spend another year on it and keep improving it. I'm not talking about new features, but the fundamentals, the core of the synth. To be honest Sylenth still sounds better imo. Don't rush urs in any way and try to be honest about the synth.
JamWide - a cross-platform Ninjam client for DAWs
