Can you use Receptor from a Linux system?
-
- KVRAF
- 4143 posts since 7 Sep, 2001 from Melbourne, Australia
I know this might be a dumb question, but I was having difficulties hunting down the particulars.
Can I set up Linux DAW and add Receptor to it? Will there be any Receptor features (like UniWire) missing if I have a Linux DAW?
It looks like EnergyXT is going to have a Linux version and support Linux native VST/VSTi (not WIN though). I'm wondering if I can use this as a host, add Receptor to it for my WIN VSTi plug-ins and then start working.
I'm pretty sure I could use it as a standalone synth/sound module, but I'm more wondering about it as an integrated part of my DAW with some of its advanced features.
Caleb
Can I set up Linux DAW and add Receptor to it? Will there be any Receptor features (like UniWire) missing if I have a Linux DAW?
It looks like EnergyXT is going to have a Linux version and support Linux native VST/VSTi (not WIN though). I'm wondering if I can use this as a host, add Receptor to it for my WIN VSTi plug-ins and then start working.
I'm pretty sure I could use it as a standalone synth/sound module, but I'm more wondering about it as an integrated part of my DAW with some of its advanced features.
Caleb
Happiness is the hidden behind the obvious.
-
- MUSEician
- 682 posts since 20 Aug, 2004 from California
Receptor is a host, not a plug-in. You cannot add a host to a DAW.
With UniWire you will have a Mac and Windows VST plug-in that will talk to a Receptor over Ethernet. So you could say that you can "add" a Receptor to a DAW this way. But, it would work only on a Mac or PC, not Linux, unless you have a Linux host that supports Windows VST.
With UniWire you will have a Mac and Windows VST plug-in that will talk to a Receptor over Ethernet. So you could say that you can "add" a Receptor to a DAW this way. But, it would work only on a Mac or PC, not Linux, unless you have a Linux host that supports Windows VST.
Dan Timis
Software Developer
Muse Research, Inc.
Software Developer
Muse Research, Inc.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 4143 posts since 7 Sep, 2001 from Melbourne, Australia
Bugger! There goes that option.
I don't suppose there's ever going to be a Linux VSTi plug-in for this UniWire technology?
Caleb
I don't suppose there's ever going to be a Linux VSTi plug-in for this UniWire technology?
Caleb
Happiness is the hidden behind the obvious.
-
- KVRer
- 24 posts since 13 Nov, 2005
You could do like they did without uniwire. Control it over VNC (You can control a receptor with VNC from linux fine), run a midi cable to receptor and an audio cable back in. There ARE ways to run windows VSTis in linux. I'd reccommend trying FST http://joebutton.co.uk/fst/ first. It would be interesting, however, if the uniwire protocol was open and a DSSI plugin (though DSSI might be a bit limited) or standalone JACK app (Best bet, as it allows for dynamically adding more audio outputs/midi ins to JACK while running) for linux could be developed.
-
- KVRian
- 1262 posts since 15 Feb, 2003 from Up the Pennine way
I think fst can handle more plugins at once and is probably what receptor uses.
Another way is to use the dssi-vst wrapper which its easy to set up. Handled 5 instances of Crystal with no problems, with a sequencer running and a hard disk recorder.
fake
Another way is to use the dssi-vst wrapper which its easy to set up. Handled 5 instances of Crystal with no problems, with a sequencer running and a hard disk recorder.
You cant beat people up then have them say "I love you"
-
- MUSEician
- 682 posts since 20 Aug, 2004 from California
We are not using FST. We have our own implmentation of VST hosting. But, we are are using wine, of course.
Dan Timis
Software Developer
Muse Research, Inc.
Software Developer
Muse Research, Inc.
