Rev C. Observations

[PhilMuller]

If you have installed Rev C, please describe your observations over Rev B? For example has much faster is your CPU? Can you load more plugins without blowing the CPU ski high? Do you feel that it was a good investment? Etc.?

[Rick@MuseResearch]

REV C unit run at about 40 watts less so they are much cooler. I've had only one REV C in for RMA and I believe that one was a HD issue caused by a Receptor sitting on some mains. Can you say DEMAG! There is bench marking going on so I expect something published sooner than later. Since it's my job to test and support Receptors I've had ever flavor ever created. Currently I'm running two REV C's, one has a LM44 3.2 GHZ processor and to me it's "The only way to fly!."

[PhilMuller]

... one has a LM44 3.2 GHZ processor and to me it's "The only way to fly!."

As soon as you give it the thumbs up, I am your first customer! I already have a ticket on Plugorama.

[RecordingArts]

Is this a CPU upgrade or this how the rec C comes?

[quote="PhilMuller"][quote="MaxReverb"]... one has a LM44 3.2 GHZ processor and to me it's "The only way to fly!."[/quote]As soon as you give it the thumbs up, I am your first customer! I already have a ticket on Plugorama.[/quote]

[MCal]

Yeah Muse are their going to be CPU upgrades for Rev C models and what about official upgrades for Rev A and B owners? Need to upgrade my demo Rev B

Al.

[thesoundsmith]

Even though mine is only a couple months od, I could use a faster CPU...