Hi I'm new to Zebra2.
I'm trying to figure out how to make wavetable slowly change wave using an LFO.
Is there any way?
Zebra2 Wavetable
-
- u-he
- 30215 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Hi, you will want to modulate the "Wave" parameter in the oscillator. Set Wave to 8.50, add LFO2 to the empty knob next to it and set that to 7.5 -> there you got, the LFO makes the oscillator go through all 16 wavetables back and forth.
(the strange numbers are because LFOs are bipolar, hence they modulate in positive and negative range - 8.5 is in the middle of 1 and 16 while 8.5 - 7.5 = 1 and 8.5 + 7.5 = 16... I sometimes think I should've done 17 wavetables from 0-16 rather than 1-16, that would've been easier)
Cheers,
Urs
(the strange numbers are because LFOs are bipolar, hence they modulate in positive and negative range - 8.5 is in the middle of 1 and 16 while 8.5 - 7.5 = 1 and 8.5 + 7.5 = 16... I sometimes think I should've done 17 wavetables from 0-16 rather than 1-16, that would've been easier)
Cheers,
Urs-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 34 posts since 31 May, 2008
Thank you.
I assume that visual feedback (the selected wave remains the middle one in the wavetable display) is not implemented in this case. It does not change with MW either (but sound changes). Pure power, pure fun.
Cheers,
Pasha
I assume that visual feedback (the selected wave remains the middle one in the wavetable display) is not implemented in this case. It does not change with MW either (but sound changes). Pure power, pure fun.
Cheers,
Pasha
-
- u-he
- 30215 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Yes, visual feedback for wavetable modulation was omitted to save cpu... it's quite intensive graphics calculation...pasha811 wrote:Thank you.
I assume that visual feedback (the selected wave remains the middle one in the wavetable display) is not implemented in this case. It does not change with MW either (but sound changes). Pure power, pure fun.
Urs-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 34 posts since 31 May, 2008
Urs is a damn clever guy (and a wonderful synth programmer!Urs wrote:Yes, visual feedback for wavetable modulation was omitted to save cpu... it's quite intensive graphics calculation...pasha811 wrote:Thank you.
I assume that visual feedback (the selected wave remains the middle one in the wavetable display) is not implemented in this case. It does not change with MW either (but sound changes). Pure power, pure fun.
)Cheers,
Pasha