Ok, I make a beat, it's sounds friggin' awsome. Well then it comes time to export it to a .wav, .mp3, ect. That's when the problems begin. Whoohoaaa man and it is a BIG one. I mean, the quality is terrible, it slows it down, lowers the pitch, and then the ocsilations go way off.
I will post the URL to a beat of mine to show you what I mean.
http://www.2shared.com/file/5877788/793 ... thmic.html
Just scroll to the very bottom and click "Save file to PC".
You don't have to, it's just if you want to see what I mean.
If you did look at it, you'll notice it is out of tune and slow. It doesn't allow me to export with 32bit Production Quality. Surely there is no way that consumer quality is this bad.
How can I fix this short of buying any more equipment?
I want to share my beats, but there's no reason if it doesn't sound the same as when I made it. What's the point of making music if you can't share it? Can somebody free me from this music isolation?
Thank's in advance.
Mu. Lab: bad export quality?
-
- KVRAF
- 13863 posts since 24 Jun, 2008 from Europe
It sounds quite OK to me 
As a check: What i hear is at 120 BPM. Does that match?
How did you play that exported WAV?
Maybe something is wrong at the playback stage..?
As a check: What i hear is at 120 BPM. Does that match?
How did you play that exported WAV?
Maybe something is wrong at the playback stage..?
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 10 posts since 15 May, 2009
Okay, so I wrote 3 paragraphs answering to your response.
And then, I checked my file again, and it does sound fine now.
Maybe it was only minor bad quality in comparison.
Sorry for wasting your time.
And then, I checked my file again, and it does sound fine now.
Maybe it was only minor bad quality in comparison.
Sorry for wasting your time.
Last edited by plague on Thu May 21, 2009 8:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 13863 posts since 24 Jun, 2008 from Europe
I have no idea what you mean when you write:
-> it slows down
-> it's absolutely bad quality
When i listen to the WAV you linked to, it sounds OK to me.
And the tempo is 120 BPM in the whole WAV, so where does it slow down?
Can anyone else please have a listen to that linked file too.
I whish i knew what you mean...
-> it slows down
-> it's absolutely bad quality
When i listen to the WAV you linked to, it sounds OK to me.
And the tempo is 120 BPM in the whole WAV, so where does it slow down?
Can anyone else please have a listen to that linked file too.
I whish i knew what you mean...
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 10 posts since 15 May, 2009
Just posting again because edited posts do not send reply alerts.
Okay, so I wrote 3 paragraphs answering to your response.
And then, I checked my file again, and it does sound fine.
Maybe it was minor bad quality only in comparison.
Sorry for wasting your time.
But I swear there was something wrong with it, whether or not it was just me.
It could have been lag coming from my high CPU Usage Percentage.
Okay, so I wrote 3 paragraphs answering to your response.
And then, I checked my file again, and it does sound fine.
Maybe it was minor bad quality only in comparison.
Sorry for wasting your time.
But I swear there was something wrong with it, whether or not it was just me.
It could have been lag coming from my high CPU Usage Percentage.
-
- KVRAF
- 13863 posts since 24 Jun, 2008 from Europe
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 10 posts since 15 May, 2009
Thank you, I've been needing a second oppinion on it.
Thank you very much.
EDIT: I figured out what the problem was!
It was because Mu. Lab was running while I was playing the song using Windows Media Player.
Thank you very much.
EDIT: I figured out what the problem was!
It was because Mu. Lab was running while I was playing the song using Windows Media Player.