zebra: modulate lfo amplitude with another lfo
- KVRAF
- 13133 posts since 7 May, 2006 from Southern California
It's not a bug, I believe it is to prevent modulation feedback. I'd love if you could modulate lfo parameters freely but I assume it'd come at an enormous CPU cost.
- KVRAF
- 26978 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
You can only modulate LFO2 amplitude with LFO1... LFO3 with LFO2 or LFO1 etc... that is on the actual modulation parameter in the LFO itself
But you can modulate LFO amplitude with any LFO using the mod matrix...
But you can modulate LFO amplitude with any LFO using the mod matrix...
- u-he
- 30216 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Yeah, sorry, it's a chicken and egg problem. I guess I'm too picky and pertfectionist here though. In 99.99% of cases the 1 ms delay will be inaudible...
- KVRAF
- 13133 posts since 7 May, 2006 from Southern California
Huh... I thought circular modulation routing wasn't possible at all. I learn something new all the time. 
- u-he
- 30216 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Why yes, with the modmatrix. Only, if you modulate a parameter of any module that's prior to the modulator in the list, it'll have about a millisecond of latency (which is less than the shortest attack time fo any analogue synth...)justin3am wrote:Huh... I thought circular modulation routing wasn't possible at all. I learn something new all the time.
- KVRAF
- 13133 posts since 7 May, 2006 from Southern California
That's fine, I'm just happy to know that modulation feedback is possible within Zebra. I'm just puzzled why I didn't know that before (maybe I did know and simply forgotUrs wrote:Why yes, with the modmatrix. Only, if you modulate a parameter of any module that's prior to the modulator in the list, it'll have about a millisecond of latency (which is less than the shortest attack time fo any analogue synth...)justin3am wrote:Huh... I thought circular modulation routing wasn't possible at all. I learn something new all the time.
