Question about MMultiAnalyzer
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14325 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
Hi Marek, correlation of what?
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14325 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
Ok, but why would you compare multiple tracks like that? Also the interface would get pretty crowded.
- KVRAF
- 5440 posts since 4 Aug, 2006 from Helsinki
When I bought this excellent product, I asked why there aren't a peak level (in addition to the EBU) indicator - I think this more "must" than the correlation. The motivation was the same: the purpose of this meter is comparing the freq. profiles of two or more tracks, not to controll the level. I think that the MMultiAnalyzer could do both - now we have to have both the MMultiAnalyzer and e.g. the Span in the channel.Svama wrote:Hi Vojtech,
i mean a simple corealtion meter like in the Voxengo Span in the right corner. Simple, but helpfull.
Thanks and greetings
Marek
H.
- KVRAF
- 5440 posts since 4 Aug, 2006 from Helsinki
If you mean sequencer in-built, not nearly as good as e.g. the Span.Burillo wrote:don't you have your DAW meters for peak levels?
If you mean DAW factory plugins, not nearly as good as e.g. the Span. H.
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14325 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
Sorry, but you will have to justify the peak meters first
. The plugin is all about comparing multiple tracks. What on earth are you going to compare with a peak meter? It has absolutely no meaning when it comes to this. Just take a pure sine wave and a sawtooth wave. Completely different, one a lot louder than the other, yet the peak level is the same.
