Anyone use NI Transient Master?
- KVRAF
- 1959 posts since 21 Sep, 2007 from The Infinite Void
Is it any good?
I've been through most of the free transient plugins out there and none of them are really that great with the exception of Flux Bittersweet.
So more specifically what I'm asking is whether Transient Master is better than Bittersweet.
I've been through most of the free transient plugins out there and none of them are really that great with the exception of Flux Bittersweet.
So more specifically what I'm asking is whether Transient Master is better than Bittersweet.
- KVRist
- 455 posts since 31 May, 2013 from Space is the Place
Yes, I tried a lot of transient shapers, and I use NI
I prefer it to the Bittersweet, but YMMV
I prefer it to the Bittersweet, but YMMV
- KVRAF
- 8077 posts since 9 Jan, 2003 from Saint Louis MO
Transient Master is my favorite; I don't even use any others. The Melda one is pretty good, flexible but didn't quite sound as good to me.
- KVRAF
- 2275 posts since 4 Dec, 2011 from Brasília, Brazil
I haven't tried any of the free alternatives... SPL Transient Designer was my go-to, but now I'm using NI Transient Master exclusevely.
My soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/waltercruz
-
- KVRAF
- 3817 posts since 8 Mar, 2006
I have and use it for a couple of years now, it's great.
I remember testing it against the SPL transient designer and I finally went for the NI one... (not really because one's better than the other... but because the character)
One thing I really wish that would be implemented is an auto-gain compensation switch when you want to drive it's limiter/clipper ...and maybe a very simple/basic time control parameter to fine-tune it's envelope a bit.
I remember testing it against the SPL transient designer and I finally went for the NI one... (not really because one's better than the other... but because the character)
One thing I really wish that would be implemented is an auto-gain compensation switch when you want to drive it's limiter/clipper ...and maybe a very simple/basic time control parameter to fine-tune it's envelope a bit.
-
- KVRAF
- 4329 posts since 26 Jun, 2004
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1959 posts since 21 Sep, 2007 from The Infinite Void
Seems quite well liked then. It's certainly looking like one of my reasons to get Komplete but I'm still undecided overall (much of what i want is in Ultimate which I really can't afford this summer).
Guess i should demo it really, but it seems like one of those tools i'll only really know if i like when i actually need to use it.
Guess i should demo it really, but it seems like one of those tools i'll only really know if i like when i actually need to use it.
-
- KVRer
- 15 posts since 3 Oct, 2013 from Chile
i use the tool integrated on battery 4, which i assume is the same transient master engine... so, for me it's useful especially on the attack, for the sustain i'm better with a compressor, but it solves the problem with attack. very useful on that.
-
- KVRian
- 702 posts since 19 Mar, 2014 from Denver, CO
Of all the reasons to get Komplete, the inclusion of Transient Master in it should be one of the least. If you want just Transient Master, just get that. If you want a boatload of Synth options and Reaktor, Kontakt and a good number of Kontakt libraries...that's when you should get Komplete. (add in a number of other great effects if you're considering Komplete Ultimate)mutantdog wrote:Seems quite well liked then. It's certainly looking like one of my reasons to get Komplete but I'm still undecided overall (much of what i want is in Ultimate which I really can't afford this summer).
Guess i should demo it really, but it seems like one of those tools i'll only really know if i like when i actually need to use it.
- KVRAF
- 1724 posts since 31 Dec, 2004 from betwixt
Yes I use it too much. Works good if you smash drums into a tape emulation then reshape the transients / release a bit with transient master or something else, even more tape, more tape, more compression, more tape again, more transient, more tape, even more tape, bounce to some real tape, back into the box for some more tape emulation, some more compression, some more transient designers, some bit reduction, some distortion, some more tape and transient, then about 10 chains of transient designers and saturators, then brickwall it to 0.5 DB dynamic range.
Layer with some white noise high passed with a linear phase EQ for some pre-ringing.
More transient master.
Some more tape emulation.
More white noise with a high shelf between 2 and 3.5 khz at the maximum boost possible for that EQ. In a chain of about 10 instances of that EQ.
Then some more transient master.
Then clip that and bitch about the inter-sample peaks.
Maybe brickwall that to 0.01 db dynamic range and call it a day.
Layer with some white noise high passed with a linear phase EQ for some pre-ringing.
More transient master.
Some more tape emulation.
More white noise with a high shelf between 2 and 3.5 khz at the maximum boost possible for that EQ. In a chain of about 10 instances of that EQ.
Then some more transient master.
Then clip that and bitch about the inter-sample peaks.
Maybe brickwall that to 0.01 db dynamic range and call it a day.
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1959 posts since 21 Sep, 2007 from The Infinite Void
I might have overstated that a bit, its hardly gonna be the deciding factor. Really I want the cinematic stuff but like i said i can't afford Ultimate right now.ImNotDedYet wrote:Of all the reasons to get Komplete, the inclusion of Transient Master in it should be one of the least. If you want just Transient Master, just get that. If you want a boatload of Synth options and Reaktor, Kontakt and a good number of Kontakt libraries...that's when you should get Komplete. (add in a number of other great effects if you're considering Komplete Ultimate)



