UK's Computer Music mag (#245) includes a Waveform review
-
- KVRAF
- 2462 posts since 9 Oct, 2008 from UK
Erm, that's it really. Except it's got 9/10 instead of T's traditional 8/10.
[W10-64, T5/6/7/W8/9/10/11/12/13, 32(to W8)&64 all, Spike],[W7-32, T5/6/7/W8, Gina16] everything underused.
-
- KVRer
- 21 posts since 13 Dec, 2004 from Cardiff
That's odd - 243 is the current issue with issue 244 not out until 16th May.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2462 posts since 9 Oct, 2008 from UK
Darn! You're right. Must be my eyesight failing in my dotage. 243 it is then. Not expecting 244 till June though.profwesson wrote:That's odd - 243 is the current issue with issue 244 not out until 16th May.
[W10-64, T5/6/7/W8/9/10/11/12/13, 32(to W8)&64 all, Spike],[W7-32, T5/6/7/W8, Gina16] everything underused.
-
- KVRAF
- 3735 posts since 17 Sep, 2016
Windows 10 and too many plugins
-
- KVRist
- 121 posts since 31 Aug, 2015
-
- Banned
- 1376 posts since 23 Jun, 2007 from france
Reaper 8/10, Waveform 9/10, is that a joke ?
Reaper is far more rock solid on OSX, even beta releases rarely crash, has lot more features, is one (if not) the best on CPU management, has a true mixer, can be heavily customized, can manage tons of user scripts ... Perhaps Reaper main negative point is not to pay for advertising.
Reaper is far more rock solid on OSX, even beta releases rarely crash, has lot more features, is one (if not) the best on CPU management, has a true mixer, can be heavily customized, can manage tons of user scripts ... Perhaps Reaper main negative point is not to pay for advertising.
-
- KVRAF
- 3735 posts since 17 Sep, 2016
Reaper has a lot of cool features, but the workflow is not very efficient, unless you are already a DAW power user and you heavily customize it.
The downside is much of the good stuff is buried away in menus, and unless you already know it's there, good luck just stumbling across it.
I find it takes too many clicks to do many simple things. So not interested in using it as my main rig. But I keep it around for testing purposes, good for comparing plugin functions with other DAWs, as it does have some powerful routing features.
The downside is much of the good stuff is buried away in menus, and unless you already know it's there, good luck just stumbling across it.
I find it takes too many clicks to do many simple things. So not interested in using it as my main rig. But I keep it around for testing purposes, good for comparing plugin functions with other DAWs, as it does have some powerful routing features.
Windows 10 and too many plugins
-
- KVRAF
- 1790 posts since 30 Dec, 2012
What's the difference between a "true mixer" and Waveform's vertical mixer?dupont wrote:Reaper 8/10, Waveform 9/10, is that a joke ?
Reaper is far more rock solid on OSX, even beta releases rarely crash, has lot more features, is one (if not) the best on CPU management, has a true mixer, can be heavily customized, can manage tons of user scripts ... Perhaps Reaper main negative point is not to pay for advertising.
-
- Banned
- 1376 posts since 23 Jun, 2007 from france
I can access to more option in Reaper mixer as the automation & record modes.dRowAudio wrote:What's the difference between a "true mixer" and Waveform's vertical mixer?dupont wrote:Reaper 8/10, Waveform 9/10, is that a joke ?
Reaper is far more rock solid on OSX, even beta releases rarely crash, has lot more features, is one (if not) the best on CPU management, has a true mixer, can be heavily customized, can manage tons of user scripts ... Perhaps Reaper main negative point is not to pay for advertising.