Hello,
as you know, all the multiband (MB) plug-ins can separate the incoming signal into… bands, of course.
They are not necessarily defined only by frequency: I'm discovering that the Crossover system can be extremely interesting to split the incoming signal into "bands" according to various criteria (separating transient and sustained part, separating noise and "tuned" part, splitting the sound according to panning, etc…).
My problem: I would like to send two different "bands" (for example: noise part and tuned part) to different outputs, in order to process each of them later with any of my other plug-ins, different ones for each band.
The only way I thought to do this (in Logic Pro X, Mac) is to make the original sound (which in itself is not going to any output, so that this original sound is not heard) go through two different sends and then to different buses, while placing two Melda multiband plug-ins one in each bus, having the same identical band and crossover settings, each with a different band muted (and the other band active).
Is there a more efficient method to achieve this (without MXXX, if possible, since I don't have it)?
Also, about this problem: is there any method to pan the output of each band differently (e.g. one all to the left and the other all to the right)? In this way, it would be easy to intercept and send each stereo channel (and therefore each band) to different processing chains, later (if one is not particularly interested in keeping the original panning of the original signal, and I am not).
Wouldn't you like to add this possibility in some future version of the MB plug-ins?
I know that there is already MXXX (which I don't have), but I was wondering if there is any way to achieve already these goals also with the "normal" MB plug-ins that I own now.
Sending different bands to different outputs: is it possible?
- KVRist
- 495 posts since 18 Aug, 2006 from Italy
- KVRAF
- 2702 posts since 9 Jul, 2015 from UK
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 495 posts since 18 Aug, 2006 from Italy
Thank you for the link, I had not seen it.
