For me giving a sound a "finish" via EQ is just my approach for sound design, because I regard control of frequency distribution as an essential part, to make a sound how I want it to be. I would also do it with Dune or Thorn or whatever sounds good in your ears. Might be that it is theoretically unneccesary, because you could do it in one flush in the mix. Nevertheless 2 different stages for me
1.) sounddesign to make a sound, how I intend it to be
2.) mixing to make it fit
Both justify the use of an EQ for me.
So you use Pigments a lot more than Dune, but at the end I won't find it in your songs? Sounds like you do some waste at that stageBONES wrote: ↑Thu Dec 23, 2021 7:01 am No, you just can't and if you think you can, then you don't understand what sound quality is in this context (or we are talking about different things entirely). Because I use Pigments a lot more than I use DUNE and it takes far more work to get it even close to sounding as good as DUNE does.
...
...
I doubt you dislike DUNE's workflow more than I do, just as you probably don't like Pigments' workflow as much as I do, but they are separate issues. I love using Pigments and I hate using DUNE but, at the end of the day, DUNE always sounds great and Pigments never does, so you'll find DUNE all over our songs, you won't find Pigments anywhere. That's just the way it goes.