MuLab vs PaulXStretch

[oldcastle]

Hei,

Beginner's question here.

I just saw a video about time stretching, and after that, I found out that ML has its own built-in time stretching functionality. That's great!

So just out of curiosity, how does ML built-in time stretching compare to PaulXStretch?

[whyterabbyt]

PaulXStretch has a completely different focus from the timestretching you'll find in any DAW, including ML. Its intended for massive timestretches, to hours or longer, beyond the point where the original audio is identifiable.

PaulXStretch is designed for radical transformation of sounds. It is NOT suitable for subtle time or pitch correction

[mutools]

With sincere great respect to Paul Stretch, which currently has more editable options than MuLab's spectral stretch, i'd like to add that MuLab's spectral stretch can do extremely long stretches too, in the same way as Paul Stretch.

[humanboeing]

That is really good news

[oldcastle]

With sincere great respect to Paul Stretch, which currently has more editable options than MuLab's spectral stretch, i'd like to add that MuLab's spectral stretch can do extremely long stretches too, in the same way as Paul Stretch.

Thanks. It's good to know that