Hei,
Beginner's question here.
I just saw a video about time stretching, and after that, I found out that ML has its own built-in time stretching functionality. That's great!
So just out of curiosity, how does ML built-in time stretching compare to PaulXStretch?
MuLab vs PaulXStretch
-
- Beware the Quoth
- 35439 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
PaulXStretch has a completely different focus from the timestretching you'll find in any DAW, including ML. Its intended for massive timestretches, to hours or longer, beyond the point where the original audio is identifiable.
https://sonosaurus.com/paulxstretch/ wrote:PaulXStretch is designed for radical transformation of sounds. It is NOT suitable for subtle time or pitch correction
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- KVRAF
- 13863 posts since 24 Jun, 2008 from Europe
With sincere great respect to Paul Stretch, which currently has more editable options than MuLab's spectral stretch, i'd like to add that MuLab's spectral stretch can do extremely long stretches too, in the same way as Paul Stretch.
-
- KVRist
- 434 posts since 17 Nov, 2020
That is really good news 
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 212 posts since 14 Feb, 2021
Thanks. It's good to know thatmutools wrote: Sun May 08, 2022 2:50 pm With sincere great respect to Paul Stretch, which currently has more editable options than MuLab's spectral stretch, i'd like to add that MuLab's spectral stretch can do extremely long stretches too, in the same way as Paul Stretch.
