Only 23 inputs in a rack ?
Why 23 and no 24, for example ?
Daniel
Sect of 24 (Guru).
Only 23 inputs in rack ?
-
Daniel Pompougnac Daniel Pompougnac https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=51754 - KVRian
- 1433 posts since 15 Dec, 2004 from In a forest , France
Hello,
Only 23 inputs in a rack ?
Why 23 and no 24, for example ?
Daniel
Sect of 24 (Guru).
Only 23 inputs in a rack ?
Why 23 and no 24, for example ?
Daniel
Sect of 24 (Guru).
-
- KVRAF
- 1600 posts since 1 Apr, 2003 from Seattle, WA
This might be a bug, but I'll have to check with Jules.
Do you need 24 or do you need even more?
Ben
Do you need 24 or do you need even more?
Ben
-
- KVRAF
- 1527 posts since 3 Apr, 2002 from desolation row
wow, *only* 23?
...
-
Daniel Pompougnac Daniel Pompougnac https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=51754
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1433 posts since 15 Dec, 2004 from In a forest , France
I 've 23 on my Tracktion, but on yours ?
In fact, I need 32. But 48 is heaven.
Thank's
Daniel.
In fact, I need 32. But 48 is heaven.
Thank's
Daniel.
-
- KVRAF
- 1600 posts since 1 Apr, 2003 from Seattle, WA
ok, let me see what's up with this.
Ben
Ben
-
- KVRAF
- 6937 posts since 4 Jun, 2004 from Utrecht, Holland
I suspect a cool looking mixer VST ...Beno wrote:ok, let me see what's up with this.
Just maybe... if the project only has 23 tracks then the rack can't hand out more inputs?
-
- KVRAF
- 10815 posts since 26 Nov, 2004 from UK
edelweiss wrote:I'm having trouble understanding why anyone on God's green earth would need 23 (or more)inputs in a rack...??
-
- KVRAF
- 6740 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
-
- The Teach
- 8273 posts since 23 Jul, 2002 from flatness
rob-
- KVRAF
- 12977 posts since 29 Sep, 2003 from Ottawa, Canada
What the...
Still on about the mixer? <grin>
If it's just a matter of adjusting a few variables, I say why not.
But if it's a whole lot of re-coding just to accomodate someone's mixer within Tracktion? Forget it. Jules would have included a mixer if he wanted to, so I don't see why it would be necessary or sensical to waste resources changing OTHER code to accomodate a mixer, either.
Daniel, I really hope some day you see the beauty of mixing without a typical-looking mixer. With sends coming in T2, and already available in T1 through Senderella, there's not one single thing that a mixer adds for functionality.
But...
We've already had that debate. <grin>
Greg
Still on about the mixer? <grin>
If it's just a matter of adjusting a few variables, I say why not.
But if it's a whole lot of re-coding just to accomodate someone's mixer within Tracktion? Forget it. Jules would have included a mixer if he wanted to, so I don't see why it would be necessary or sensical to waste resources changing OTHER code to accomodate a mixer, either.
Daniel, I really hope some day you see the beauty of mixing without a typical-looking mixer. With sends coming in T2, and already available in T1 through Senderella, there's not one single thing that a mixer adds for functionality.
But...
We've already had that debate. <grin>
Greg
-
- KVRian
- 699 posts since 21 Nov, 2000 from somewhere over the rainbow
aaargh....... Mixers.........
Here is my very personal statement about mixers:
Here is my very personal statement about mixers: